This is a significant matter, and it needs to be investigated seriously! On December 8, Xiang Ligang raised a question on his Weibo, stating that Peking University has a Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Research Center in its law school, formerly known as the Human Rights Research Center. This center collaborates with the Raoul Wallenberg Institute of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law at Lund University in Sweden to offer a master's program in human rights law. It is said that the funding for this program is entirely provided by Sweden. Xiang Ligang believes that since these programs involve ideology, relevant national departments should review these funds, how much money has been received, and how these funds have been used? What are the research outcomes of the projects related to this center, and do they comply with Chinese laws, regulations, and socialist values? What are the main courses taught by this center? Are these courses consistent with Chinese law and value systems? Moreover, what kind of individuals have been trained by such programs? Who are they? Xiang Ligang asks a good question! The significance lies in him uncovering a scar in our social science education and research over the years, namely the question of who our social sciences are researching for, who they are serving, and for whom they are cultivating talent. If this issue is not resolved, it may threaten the national color, regime security, and social stability. I would like to extend that many social science projects in our universities have extensive connections with certain organizations from specific countries, receiving substantial foreign funding. So what is the relationship between these social science projects funded by foreign money and these financial backers? Could it create a form of dependency, where our educational and research institutions conduct research according to the intentions of foreign political or capital interests, serving foreign political or capital interests instead of Chinese national interests? Think about it; does it not feel chilling and terrifying upon closer reflection? This brings us to another issue: over the years, many of our universities and social science institutions have formed political or capital dependency relationships with certain foreign capital providers with specific purposes. The institutions that receive funding and the personnel trained with such funding will eventually become agents of certain foreign political and capital forces. Is the Human Rights and Humanitarian Research Center at Peking University mentioned by Xiang Ligang one such institution? Of course, in China, there are many such legal research or educational institutions, and this situation exists not only in law but also extensively in economics and many other social science fields. We will also find that whether in the field of law, economics, journalism, or sociology, there exist these types of dependent institutions, which take money to do things for others or take money to avert disasters for others. Of course, what kind of matters are handled and what disasters are averted is hard to say. Here, a deeper issue must be raised: individuals who are dependent on certain foreign political and capital institutions will enter various important educational, research, and management institutions in our country, becoming leaders in various policy-making departments or core members of important think tanks, contributing to the formulation of many important policies in our country. Will the policies made with the participation of these individuals, who have a dependent personality and value system, also carry traces of some kind of dependent political or value system? Will they also carry certain intentions of foreign political or capital forces? Over the years, our social sciences have long looked up to the West and admired it, with a large group of elites who uphold Western values, especially in our educational, economic, media, and political-legal fields. This elite group holds considerable discourse power in our society and is a significant and influential group. Generally speaking, this group is dependent on a certain foreign political institution or capital force, becoming brokers of capital and power, acting as agents of the foreign political and capital forces they are dependent on, akin to what Mr. Lu Xun described as the capitalist's lackey. Of course, I believe that these individuals are no longer simple lackeys; some have evolved into rabid dogs carrying certain political viruses. Some of these individuals or a part of this group actually lack national dignity, shame, and backbone. They are no longer merely taking money to do things but are actively cooperating with the intentions of foreign political and capital forces to engage in actions that change our national color. Therefore, we need to thoroughly investigate those social science projects that receive funding from foreign governments or capital for research or joint training, examining what results these projects have achieved and who they are serving. Social science projects are related to ideology, national color, and the future of our motherland. It is better to investigate seriously; only after the investigation can we feel assured, just as one feels at ease living in a clean house. $BNB $BTC $ETH