Safety is always the first priority,

Ethena Project: In 2024, they engaged PeckShield to audit the USDe stablecoin contract, with zero major vulnerabilities, directly boosting the project’s market value to over 1 billion dollars. When the audit report was released, the token EN A surged by 20% on the same day.

Aave Protocol: They repeatedly engaged OpenZeppelin to audit their lending logic, making it as secure as a steel barrel, helping them avoid countless hacker attacks. They are now the big brother of DeFi, with an annual TVL of over 10 billion.

bZx Protocol: In 2019, they were hacked twice, and the audit report overlooked the flash loan vulnerability, resulting in losses of over ten million, severely damaging the project’s reputation, which took several years to recover.

A well-conducted audit is a protective talisman; a botched one is a ticking time bomb.

Logically, RIVER should have paid a professional audit team to review all associated smart contracts thoroughly.

I just saw an update,

The Supremacy audit team turned River's core contract upside down, especially the newly upgraded conversion and staking parts, all passed.

No critical vulnerabilities were found, only a few minor issues were fixed. Is there a technical endorsement? Or does it prove that River has not fallen behind in rapid iteration?

My understanding is that River is trying to boost confidence, wanting to reassure investors and users.

Audit Report: github.com/SupremacyTeam/publications/blob/main/River/Supremacy-Audit-Report-River-RiverPointConverter2-v1.0.pdf

#River @River4fun @RiverdotInc #4FUN $satUSD $RIVER