@Injective $INJ
After several security incidents at CEX and the growing global regulatory pressure, the on-chain security of Injective and its permissionless nature present themselves as a counterparty risk mitigation alternative for users.
Injective also benefits from the shared security of the Cosmos ecosystem, while Binance operates with its own security mechanisms and emergency funds.
In this evolving risk environment:
How does Binance assess the systemic risk of centralization (counterparty risk, hacks to hot wallets) against the risks of smart contracts (bugs in the code) inherent to a DEX like Injective, and how does this assessment inform its investment strategy?
In what way does Injective's approach to programmable regulatory compliance (e.g., whitelists for RWA) help or complicate Binance's global regulatory position, considering that Binance seeks a broad regulatory umbrella while Injective allows the creation of markets operating outside of it?
#injective #WriteToEarnUpgrade #Write2Earn! #BinanceSquareFamily #Binance