Brothers, let's talk about something serious. Look at YGG, don’t just count which chain it’s on or which game it has invested in. Those are just the visible troop movements. The real decisions about the future war happen at a deeper level—a struggle over the 'operating rules' of the Web3 gaming world.
YGG is no longer satisfied with just being a player or investor. It is quietly trying to transform from a 'participant' in one ecosystem to a 'protocol layer' and 'standard setter' across multiple ecosystems. This is more profound than earning profits; it is about competing for the 'legislative power' of the digital world.
First Frontline: Defining the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for 'On-Chain Guilds'
The 'on-chain guild' toolkit launched by YGG is its first set of 'standard drafts.' It transforms guild operations—treasury management, member tracking, reward distribution—from chaotic Discord and spreadsheets into modular, composable smart contract templates.
What does this mean? For any new game or community that wants to quickly establish a transparent and credible guild, the easiest way is to directly adopt YGG's 'standard components.' Over time, the definition of 'how a guild should operate' will subtly be held in YGG's hands. It has become the provider of underlying infrastructure, just like providing standard bricks and blueprints for all builders.
Second front: forging a universal passport for 'player identity'
More ruthless than managing associations is defining the 'player' itself. The on-chain achievements and soul-binding certificates vigorously promoted by YGG are essentially an attempt to issue a 'universal skill passport' for the Web3 gaming world.
In game A, you are a legendary craftsman; in game B, you are a tactical master. These achievements are recorded and verified by YGG's protocol and turned into portable credit badges. In the future, when a new game needs to find 'players with strategy game master certification' for internal testing, where will it send inquiries? It is likely to the places that have integrated this reputation protocol. What YGG is weaving is a standardized certification and credit network for 'player labor.' Whoever controls the definition of the credit system holds the hub for allocating core human resources.
Third front: constructing the governance constitution of the 'SubDAO federation'
YGG's 'main DAO + SubDAO' structure is not simply a decentralized management. It is a large social experiment on how 'decentralized large-scale collaboration should be governed.'
Each SubDAO (like YGG SEA, IndiGG) acts like a highly autonomous city-state, focusing on local or vertical fields. The main DAO provides the foundational protocols and shared resources. They are collectively exploring how to allocate capital, how to share profits, and how to balance efficiency with democracy in decision-making. This constantly trial-and-error evolving organizational 'constitution' is itself a highly valuable digital governance asset. In the future, any project that wants to organize global digital collaboration may come to study or directly draw from YGG's governance framework.
So, what is YGG's ultimate ambition?
It may wish to become the 'de facto protocol layer' in the Web3 gaming sector. When game developers want to quickly gain community and tools, they think of YGG's standard guild suite; when players want to accumulate cross-game reputation, they rely on YGG's certificate system; when capital wants to invest in organized digital productivity, they refer to YGG's SubDAO federation model.
$YGG token is the governance rights and equity share of this increasingly robust 'rule network.' Its long-term value will be deeply bound to the extent to which its established 'rules' are adopted and the total scale of 'digital productivity' mobilized by its network.
This 'battle of rules' has no smoke but determines the form of all superstructures. YGG is no longer just a player in games; it is trying to become the 'architect' of the gaming world, drafting the blueprint of rules that all participants will live by in the future. Do you understand this deeper game?
