You are right to an extent, but I think we need to understand about this MoU first | You can correct me if I am wrong

First, this is a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding. It does not mean the Government of Pakistan will be forced for $2 billion worth of tokenization. The purpose is to explore real-world asset tokenization and get technical support from Binance. If the government decides the model is not suitable, they can skip at any stage.

Second, while Binance may not be a traditional institutional tokenization provider like BlackRock or JP Morgan, it is one of the largest global blockchain ecosystems. If assets are tokenized on BNB Chain, this MoU can unlock infrastructure, liquidity, and ecosystem support that other asset managers cannot directly provide.

Third, this MoU does not mean future collaboration will never happen. If Pakistan chooses another blockchain or institutional framework later, partnerships with global banks or asset managers can still happen. In fact, Pakistan has already shown openness to multi-partner models through collaborations with firms like Libertify.

So this MoU should be seen as an exploratory step, not a final decision. Transparency will matter when binding contracts, custodians, and settlement frameworks are selected. Act as technology explorer and stop politics on such steps please