The Ultimate Question: Is YGG's goal to become the 'Tencent Games' of Web3?

Referring to Yield Guild Games (YGG) as the 'Tencent Games of Web3' is an interesting analogy, but this metaphor only reveals the surface of its business ambitions while obscuring the fundamental differences between the two.

Similarities: Ecological Aggregation and Scale Effects

Just as Tencent Games aggregates a large number of users and products through traffic and channel advantages, YGG aims to become the core entry point and distribution platform of the Web3 gaming world. It gathers players through its guild network and invests in gaming assets, attempting to form a strong network effect, which indeed resembles Tencent's platform strategy.

Fundamental Differences: Ownership Economy and Open Ecology

However, the core is completely different. Tencent Games is the absolute owner of a closed ecosystem, where users are merely content consumers. YGG, on the other hand, is committed to building an open ecology based on ownership and community governance. The game assets that players access through YGG are essentially NFTs owned by themselves, rather than rented virtual items; the decision-making power of YGG theoretically belongs to the token holders, rather than a centralized management team. Its goal is not to 'own' games, but to become a decentralized infrastructure that connects players with games and allows participants to share value.

Therefore, YGG's ultimate goal may not be to become the 'Tencent' of Web3, but to explore an unprecedented path: to become a virtual economic community collectively owned and governed by the community. It seeks not centralized control, but decentralized network effects and openness, with a vision to reshape the very production relationships of the digital world. @Yield Guild Games #YGGPlay $YGG