This is the core reason I believe $TAO can rise to 100,000 U per unit, becoming the BTC of the AI world.
Also, $FET can rise to 60 U per unit, and $LINK can rise to 500 U per unit for key reasons.
In 99% of cases, AI's market judgment ability is more suitable for trading than humans.
Just look at 👀 Da A: everyone criticizes Liang Wenfeng for ruining the market with quantitative methods, yet everyone wants to become Liang Wenfeng and use quantitative methods to plunder.
AI is definitely a major trend, and as long as AI is trending, the narrative of TAO is top-tier: large models, computing power, self-reinforcing blockchain, BTC-style mining output + halving mechanism……
Blockchain AI is inseparable from TAO; it is the underlying layer of AI. As long as AI exists, TAO is invincible.
The logic behind FET's price increase is even simpler: intelligent agents.
What is an intelligent agent?
All current AI-related model apps on the market are uniformly “AI intelligent agents”; ChatGPT is, DeepSeek is, Grok is too.
What is an intelligent agent?
It is when you use FET to automatically generate a trader and tell it what method you want to use for trading and making money.
Once it's done, you don’t need to worry; FET's trading intelligent agent can automate buying and selling.
This is the intelligent agent. Top traders look down on such intelligent agents, but 99% of people can’t even compare to intermediate traders.
To put it bluntly: 99% of people have less earning ability than Binance's built-in grid robot 🤖
This is the charm of FET and LINK.
LINK is an oracle, using big data and models to predict market fluctuations.
It is not an exaggeration to say: 99% of people’s judgment ability regarding the market is less than LINK.
Admitting one's inadequate ability is not shameful, especially in the age of AI and big data.
With inadequate personal ability, let AI help me reach the peak.
What’s scary is having insufficient ability and not believing in AI; that would be disastrous, and zeroing out is inevitable‼️
