when investment 1$ on crypto 0.01 cent profit and - 0.99cent | BoSsYy -_- on Binance Square

Trending Articles

Bookmarked and Liked

--

when investment 1$ on crypto 0.01 cent profit and - 0.99cent lost 😂😆😆$BTC #BTC 

Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.

BTC

86,300

-3.98%

25

0

Explore the latest crypto news

⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto

💬 Interact with your favorite creators

👍 Enjoy content that interests you

Email / Phone number

Relevant Creator

@Square-Creator-5fc57548c062

Explore More From Creator

#injective @Injective $INJ Injective isn’t waiting for finance to evolve — it’s handing the blueprint to the builders. It’s saying: the old rails are clogged, permissioned, slow. You know better. Now go rebuild — from the ground up. No gatekeepers. No legacy APIs holding you back. Just a clean, fast, fully decentralized layer — where order books live on-chain, settlement is instant, and every app owns its logic. This isn’t about tweaking DeFi. It’s about tearing down the walls between trading, derivatives, payments — and letting developers fuse them in ways that actually serve people. Think: a carbon market that settles like a stock trade. A prediction market that feels like a betting app — but runs trustlessly. A bond that updates in real time, priced by open consensus, not a backroom desk. Injective gives builders the infrastructure. Then steps aside. Because real innovation doesn’t come from committees. It comes from those who see the cracks in the system — and have the tools to pour something new into them. So yeah — they’re not just inviting builders. They’re arming them.

--

Kite.ai is this new Layer-1 blockchain built specifically for the AI agent economy. It's all about giving autonomous agents real ways to handle identity, payments, and governance on-chain. When it comes to webhooks in the traditional sense—like outgoing notifications to your server for events—no, it doesn't support that directly. There's nothing in their docs or architecture about setting up webhook endpoints for pushes. But event-driven architectures? Absolutely, that's baked right in. The whole system runs on real-time, high-frequency interactions between agents. They use state channels for off-chain streaming micropayments and instant communications. Billions of tiny events get processed super fast, then settled on-chain periodically. Agents react to intents, transactions, and messages almost instantly. It's designed for that agent-to-agent flow, with verifiable passing and escrows. So while not classic webhooks, it's deeply event-driven at its core. Makes sense for a platform where AI agents need to coordinate autonomously without constant polling. Pretty forward-thinking setup, really.#Kite $KITE @KITE AI

--

Falcon Finance doesn’t try to be the biggest. It aims to be the most *precise*. Where others push high yields at all costs — stacking risk like kindling — Falcon builds around control, not just capital. Its edge? Real-time, risk-aware lending powered by on-chain solvency checks—not static collateral ratios that lag behind market moves. If a position starts slipping, the system reacts *before* it breaks. Borrowers aren’t just screened on assets—they’re assessed on behavior. Wallet history, repayment patterns, even interaction frequency feed into dynamic credit tiers. Good actors get better terms. No guesswork. Lenders, meanwhile, see exactly where their capital goes—not pooled into black-box vaults, but allocated to *specific*, verified counterparties. Transparency isn’t a feature; it’s the architecture. And it’s built for institutions *and* individuals—not by dumbing things down, but by surfacing the right controls at the right level. A DAO treasury manager and a savvy retail user can both find what they need, without compromise. Most protocols optimize for volume. Falcon optimizes for resilience. It’s not about moving faster. It’s about moving *smarter*—with every decision anchored in live data, adaptive risk, and real accountability. That’s how you survive not just the next bull run—but the next crash.#FalconFinance $FF @Falcon Finance

--

You don’t trust someone like Lorenzo because of a title or a pitch. we trust Lorenzo protocol because you’ve seen him show up — consistently, quietly, without fanfare — and make things work when others couldn’t.Because trust isn’t given — it’s earned through consistency, and Lorenzo has been doing the quiet, hard work long before hype cycles turned. It doesn’t try to replace what already works. Instead, it sits beneath — a neutral layer that helps DAOs, protocols, and communities coordinate *without* forcing them into rigid structures or surrendering sovereignty. Its design is intentionally minimal: no bloated governance, no top-down control. Just binding commitments, transparent execution, and enforceable reciprocity — the kind of plumbing you don’t notice until it’s missing. What sets it apart isn’t flash — it’s durability. Contracts settle off-chain where possible, on-chain only when necessary. Disputes resolve through human-readable logic, not just code. And upgrades happen by consensus, not decree. More than that — the team behind it has skin in the game. They’ve weathered bull and bear markets. They’ve walked away from quick wins to preserve long-term integrity. You see that in how they handle edge cases — not with patches, but with principle. People trust Lorenzo because it doesn’t ask for blind faith. It gives you clarity: *Here’s what we’ll do. Here’s how you verify it. Here’s what happens if things go sideways.* In a space full of promises, that kind of reliability is rare. And once you’ve seen it hold — through volatility, forks, even failures elsewhere — you don’t unsee it. Long-term coordination needs long-term thinking. Lorenzo isn’t built for the next quarter. It’s built for the next decade. And that’s why serious builders are already anchoring to it. #lorenzoprotocol $BANK @Lorenzo Protocol

--

YGG doesn’t treat every region the same — because they know you can’t fix economic gaps with a copy-paste strategy. They start by listening. Where are people struggling most? What games actually work there? How do they get paid — cash, mobile wallets, crypto? What’s stopping them from playing even if they want to? Then they build local teams. Not remote managers in another time zone — real people on the ground who speak the language, understand the culture, and know how to move money without getting stuck in bureaucracy. Each region gets its own subDAO — like YGG SEA or Ola GG. These aren’t just branches; they’re mini-governments with skin in the game. They pick which games to support, set up payout systems that actually work locally, hire community leaders who live there, and adjust splits based on what keeps scholars motivated.#YGGPlay $YGG @Yield Guild Games

--

Latest News

Ethereum's Market Dynamics and Investment Outlook

--

UK Opens Consultation on Cryptocurrency Regulation Proposal

--

Mirelo Secures $41 Million in Seed Funding for AI Audio Model Development

--

Asian Markets Experience Decline as Nikkei and KOSPI Close Lower

--

Significant Ethereum Transfer from Hyperunit to Anonymous Address

--

Trending Articles

$BTC 🚨 BITCOIN IS CRASHING AND THIS IS T

Cardano ( $ADA ) price at the end of every year 2017: $0.72

🚨 DECEMBER 19TH: The Date Everyone is Ignoring That Could CRASH Your Crypto Portfolio! 💣

$BTC – Daily Trend Update

Cookie Preferences

Cookie Preferences