$FORM exploded from 0.27 straight into 0.42, then briefly | Alex Nick on Binance Square

Trending Articles

Bookmarked and Liked

--

$FORM  exploded from 0.27 straight into 0.42, then briefly cooled before pushing back toward 0.41. 
The retrace was shallow relative to the impulse, keeping the higher-low structure intact. 
As long as price holds above 0.36–0.35, this looks like continuation strength rather than exhaustion.
FORM
0.4314
+44.08%

Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.

26

0

Explore the latest crypto news

⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto

💬 Interact with your favorite creators

👍 Enjoy content that interests you

Email / Phone number

Relevant Creator

@Alexa_Nick

Explore More From Creator

The more time I spend around Lorenzo Protocol, the more I realize it’s built for people who don’t want to live inside charts all day. Most users aren’t trying to become fund managers. They just want smart exposure without having to babysit every decision. That’s where Lorenzo really clicks for me. Instead of throwing users straight into complicated mechanics, Lorenzo wraps real financial strategies into onchain products that actually make sense to hold. The OTFs feel less like DeFi experiments and more like something you’d park capital in and let it do its job. You’re not chasing every move. You’re trusting a structure that was designed to handle different market conditions. What I like most is how clean the setup feels. Some vaults focus on one idea, others combine multiple strategies, and you can tell exactly what role each part plays. It reminds me a lot of how traditional portfolios are built, just without the layers of opacity and middlemen. You’re not guessing where your money is going. You can see it. The strategies themselves aren’t flashy either, and that’s a good thing. Quant approaches, managed futures, volatility based systems. These aren’t meant to excite you daily. They’re meant to behave differently when markets change. That kind of thinking feels rare in DeFi. Even the BANK token fits this mindset. It doesn’t scream for attention. It rewards people who stick around, participate, and actually care about how the protocol evolves. Governance feels tied to patience instead of speed, which is honestly refreshing. Lorenzo doesn’t feel like it’s trying to win the moment. It feels like it’s trying to still matter a few years from now. In a space that’s obsessed with noise, that kind of quiet confidence stands out to me. #lorenzoprotocol @Lorenzo Protocol $BANK

--

I keep coming back to Kite because it feels like one of the few projects actually thinking ahead instead of reacting to what already exists. Most blockchains still assume there’s a person behind every transaction. Someone clicking buttons, signing approvals, watching a screen. But that’s not how things are really moving anymore. Bots already trade faster than humans. Systems already rebalance, liquidate, hedge, and route value on their own. The gap isn’t automation. The gap is infrastructure that’s meant for it. That’s where Kite starts to make sense to me. It treats autonomous agents as first class participants, not hacks layered on top of human wallets. Identity isn’t an afterthought. An agent isn’t just borrowing a key and hoping nothing breaks. Users, agents, and sessions are clearly separated, which means intent stays with the human while execution happens elsewhere. That distinction feels small until you realize how many problems it quietly solves. What I also like is that Kite doesn’t pretend autonomy should be absolute. Control still exists. Permissions expire. Limits are defined. Delegation can grow slowly instead of all at once. That mirrors how people actually trust systems in real life. You don’t hand everything over on day one. You test, adjust, and then expand. The real time aspect matters more than most people admit. Agents don’t work in batches. They react to conditions. Delays introduce risk. Kite closing the gap between decision and settlement makes automation feel less fragile and more dependable. Even the way the KITE token is positioned feels grounded. It’s not forcing utility before there’s real usage. Participation comes first. Governance and staking come later, when there’s something meaningful to govern. That pacing tells me this wasn’t designed for hype cycles. I don’t think most people will ever “use” Kite directly. And that’s probably the point. If it works, it disappears into the background while agents handle things more cleanly than humans ever could. #KITE @KITE AI $KITE

--

Falcon Finance Made Me Rethink What Liquidity Is Supposed to Feel Like I’ve spent enough time in DeFi to know the usual deal. If you need liquidity, you’re almost always paying for it in one way or another. You sell too early, or you borrow with liquidation sitting in the background like a threat. After a while, that tradeoff stops feeling clever and just starts feeling exhausting. Falcon Finance caught my attention because it doesn’t start from that assumption. What I like about it is how straightforward the idea is. I can keep the assets I believe in, deposit them as collateral, and mint USDf without blowing up my long term position. That alone changes how I approach decisions. I’m not rushing. I’m not forced into timing the market just to unlock capital. USDf isn’t pretending risk disappears. The overcollateralization makes that obvious. But it creates breathing room. It puts distance between volatility and panic, and that distance matters more than most people admit. When you’re not cornered, you think better. Another thing that stands out to me is Falcon’s openness to different kinds of collateral, not just volatile crypto but also tokenized real world assets. That feels like a quiet acknowledgment that onchain finance is growing up and doesn’t need to revolve entirely around the same assets anymore. I’m not looking at Falcon like it’s a magic solution. Collateral systems take time to prove themselves, and risk only shows its real face during stress. But philosophically, it’s pointed in a direction I respect. Instead of asking how to squeeze more yield out of users, Falcon is asking how to stop forcing people into bad decisions just to stay liquid. In a space where liquidations are treated like a feature, that shift alone makes it worth watching. #FalconFinance @Falcon Finance $FF

--

APRO is one of those pieces of infrastructure you only notice when it’s missing And honestly, that’s usually when things go wrong I’ve seen plenty of protocols fail in ways that looked random on the surface But once you dig a bit deeper, bad data is almost always part of the story Wrong price at the wrong time Delayed input during volatility Or information that looked fine until it suddenly wasn’t That’s why APRO feels important to me It’s not trying to move faster than everyone else It’s trying to make sure systems don’t quietly drift into failure What I like about APRO’s approach is that it doesn’t treat data like something neutral Data shapes outcomes If the input is wrong, everything downstream breaks no matter how good the code is APRO seems built with that responsibility in mind Instead of forcing every application into the same update pattern, it lets developers choose how and when data enters the system Some things need constant updates Other things only need information at very specific moments That flexibility matters more than people realize The AI verification layer also makes sense to me in a very grounded way It’s not there to predict markets or make decisions It’s there to catch things that don’t look right before damage spreads In my experience, systems that rely only on incentives to keep data honest eventually get exploited What stands out most is that APRO feels like it was designed by people who expect things to go wrong sometimes And instead of pretending otherwise, they built guardrails Checks Fallbacks That mindset doesn’t get attention But it’s usually what keeps infrastructure standing when pressure shows up APRO isn’t flashy It’s careful And in a space where quiet failures cause the biggest losses, that kind of care goes a long way #APRO @APRO Oracle $AT

--

$EPIC reversed cleanly from the 0.457 lows and surged back into the 0.53–0.54 range. The rebound was strong enough to break the prior downtrend and reclaim key levels in one leg. This pullback pause feels constructive more like price stabilizing after momentum than sellers regaining control, especially above 0.50.

--

Latest News

Senator Warren Seeks Investigation into Decentralized Crypto Exchanges

--

Atlanta Fed President Advocates Steady Interest Rates Amid Inflation Concerns

--

Federal Reserve's Inflation Target Challenges Credibility, Says Bostic

--

Federal Reserve's Bostic Warns Against Further Rate Cuts

--

Federal Reserve's Bostic Comments on Employment Market Trends

--

Trending Articles

Analyst Who Correctly Predicted XRP Crash to $1.88 Sets His Next Price Target

BeMaster BuySmart

$SOL Year End Closing Prices 2020 – ~$1.51 2021 – ~$170.30

I’ve been thinking about this for a long time, so I thought

CRYPTO MECHANIC

🚨 CZ JUST DROPPED A QUIET BOMBSHELL ON $ASTER 🚨 This fle

🔢 The Math Nobody Likes to Talk About 🐶 SHIB supply (appr

Cookie Preferences

Cookie Preferences