Surprisingly clear choices marked Durov's approach. While many apps hide behind confusion, he opened certain doors on purpose. Third-party reviewers can study patterns, but never touch personal data. That creates checks most private systems ignore entirely. Instead of just sharing source lines, this focuses on how the system runs day to day. Rarely do privacy tools let outside eyes watch actions, not just scripts.
This changes nothing about spying or secrecy. Who checks if something is true matters most. Power usually sits with officials or company insiders. Not here. Outside people have it now - but only within tight rules. Fleeing borders like a shadow, Durov lives in France though born in Russia, moving where rules bend unpredictably. Not belief, but survival might shape his moves - launching audits before governments can knock on his door.
Some point out holes - patchy details lead to shaky takeaways. Yet others say total clarity might miss the whole point. Too much openness invites misuse; too little opens doors to harm. Balance here feels thin, maybe short-lived.
Not what's done that catches attention, yet how it's set up - like a system built on answerability, rather than promises from companies. This hints that following rules later may depend less on laws, more on proof designed into systems, visible mainly to those with the right tools.#BTCVSGOLD #WriteToEarnUpgrade #BNB_Market_Update
