Keonne Rodriguez, a co‑founder of Bitcoin privacy wallet Samourai, has begun serving a five‑year federal sentence — and on Christmas Eve he sent out a personal letter from inside prison that mixes the everyday reality of intake with the wider legal controversy surrounding his conviction. In the short note, shared publicly, Rodriguez described his first days behind bars. He called the intake process — searches, medical checks and the move into housing — “confusing and unnatural,” but ultimately “manageable.” He said fellow inmates had treated him with respect and that he had endured an emotional goodbye with family days before the holiday. The letter, dated Christmas Eve, marked his seventh day at the facility; reports say his wife was scheduled to be his first visitor on Christmas Day. The timing underscores the human side of a case that has already drawn intense attention across the crypto world. Rodriguez was sentenced on Nov. 19 on charges tied to his role in a crypto mixing protocol. His prosecution has become a flashpoint in an ongoing debate: when, if ever, does building or maintaining privacy software cross into criminal liability when others misuse those tools? The comparison to Roman Storm, a Tornado Cash co‑founder who also faced prosecution, is frequently invoked by advocates and critics alike. Supporters argue Rodriguez’s conviction threatens free speech and the development of open‑source privacy tools. A clemency petition has gathered more than 12,000 signatures, and many privacy proponents stress that no direct victims were identified as a result of his work. Rodriguez himself has framed the action against him as “lawfare,” publicly accusing regulators and judges of targeting innovation — a claim that has resonated widely within crypto communities. Prosecutors present a different narrative. They point to how certain tools were structured and promoted, and say that some actors used those systems to obscure illicit transfers. At the heart of the dispute is a legal and philosophical question courts are struggling with: when is code merely neutral technology, and when is it a means to facilitate crime? That tension — between protecting software development and preventing criminal misuse — is why Rodriguez’s case has attracted scrutiny from developers, legal scholars and privacy groups. It also drew a brief note from President Donald Trump, who on Dec. 16 said he would “take a look” at Rodriguez’s case, keeping the possibility of executive clemency in the public conversation. Rodriguez has publicly appealed to the president for a pardon as he begins his sentence. Public reaction remains mixed. Some see the campaign around Rodriguez as an important defense of open‑source developers; others caution that courts must and will weigh evidence of intent and conduct, not simply the existence of code. What’s clear is that the case has pushed thorny questions about privacy technology, liability and free speech into the spotlight — and made it harder for lawmakers and judges to ignore them. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

#BTC