One day destroys 16,000 UNI, and some people are already talking endlessly about the 'deflation narrative'?
Even if you exaggerate the data to the sky, assuming 20,000 UNI destroyed per day, it's only 7.3 million annually.
Question: Is 7.3 million enough to cover half of the project's annual 'rigid release' of 20 million UNI?
It's not even a fraction! On one hand, the destruction is as insignificant as a mosquito's leg; on the other, the selling pressure keeps pouring in. Anyone with basic logic can see this imbalance. Who is pretending not to notice? 😂
The most annoying are those with 'selective blindness':
They never mention the annual 20 million UNI inflation dilution, yet they use this tiny destruction data to brainwash people.
Was this rebound due to UNI's destruction, or was it driven by ETH's sector rotation?
Ask those who are actually trading with real money—do they really believe UNI stood up on its own?
As soon as the market turns slightly green, every fake analyst emerges, pointing and talking like prophets.
The rebound is just so-so, yet the hired 'apologists' are more active than the trading volume. That's a good investment, isn't it? 😂😂
Stop deceiving yourselves. The fundamental logic of the token model is clear:
When the 'inflation faucet' flows faster than the 'destruction drain' can handle, the so-called value capture is just a joke.
How long can this rebound last? Wash your face and go to sleep—dreams have everything.
