What problem does Vanar Chain solve that Ethereum L2 has yet to address?

Once, I tried to build a simple interaction flow on an Ethereum L2: storing state, updating user data, and then responding almost in real-time.

Everything worked, but it always felt like I was taking the "scenic route." The fees weren't too high, but latency and complexity were still present.

@Vanarchain approaches the problem from a different angle. Instead of optimizing for DeFi or composability, it focuses on applications with high interaction frequency like games and entertainment.

Vanar accepts data separation: on-chain only retains what is needed for integrity, while off-chain handles the heavy lifting and continuous changes.

This enables faster responses and more stable costs for end users.

Ethereum L2 addresses scalability for Ethereum. Vanar addresses the experience for a specific group of applications. It's not a replacement, but an alternative.

The trade-off lies in the level of decentralization and standardization. However, for applications that require speed and continuous interaction rhythm, Vanar is targeting a gap that L2 still leaves open.

@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY