Htp96
Verified Creator
We are the Vietnamese non-profit crypto community that helps Vietnamese people
X (Twitter) : @htp96_community
Open Trade
Frequent Trader
7.7 Years
99 Following
23.2K+ Followers
12.4K+ Liked
1.0K+ Shared
All
Quotes
Live
PINNED
Below is the information I want to share with you HTP96 about Binance commissions
Currently, you can receive a commission of up to 50%, instead of the default level as before. If you want to transfer the referral to me, just read this article for about 1 minute and it's done.
READ NOW
Instead of receiving a default commission before, now Binance will set it according to the level of 30-40-50% depending on the level you achieve.
Commission upgrade: Can occur daily – just meet the criteria, and the system will automatically upgrade the next day.
READ NOW
Instead of receiving a default commission before, now Binance will set it according to the level of 30-40-50% depending on the level you achieve.
Commission upgrade: Can occur daily – just meet the criteria, and the system will automatically upgrade the next day.
Why does Vanar choose the consumer-first blockchain direction instead of DeFi-first?
Looking back at nearly the entire history of Web3, I think there's a fairly clear truth: DeFi-first is not a random choice, but the easiest choice.
Easy to build, easy to measure success, easy to create liquidity, and easy to tell a growth story.
But precisely because it's easy, it also creates a strong inertia, causing most blockchains to be designed around the same type of user: crypto-native, accepting friction, willing to learn new concepts for profit.
Plasma and the effort to make stablecoins a daily financial infrastructure
In the early days of 2026, I had a rather funny moment to share with you all.
,I transferred USDT from this wallet to that wallet, still the familiar operation, but this time I hardly had to think about where the gas was, which chain was cheaper, or whether the bridge was safe.
Transactions complete in a few seconds, fees nearly zero.
At that moment, I realized Plasma is doing something that very few chains are serious about: turning stablecoins into a tool for daily use, not just a 'DeFi product'.
The market capitalization of stablecoins is contracting: a signal of liquidity withdrawal from crypto
I am noticing a rather concerning signal: the market capitalization of stablecoins is contracting.
This is the first time in the current cycle that we have witnessed such a sharp decline in the ERC-20 stablecoin group.
📉 In just one week, their total market capitalization has evaporated by about 7 billion USD, from 162 billion to 155 billion USD.
From my perspective, this is a negative signal. It shows that a portion of investors are no longer just sitting on the sidelines with stablecoins, but are choosing to withdraw entirely from the crypto market. In this context, the cryptocurrency market is still adjusting, while gold continues to reach peaks and the stock market maintains a relatively strong upward trend.
This is the first time in the current cycle that we have witnessed such a sharp decline in the ERC-20 stablecoin group.
📉 In just one week, their total market capitalization has evaporated by about 7 billion USD, from 162 billion to 155 billion USD.
From my perspective, this is a negative signal. It shows that a portion of investors are no longer just sitting on the sidelines with stablecoins, but are choosing to withdraw entirely from the crypto market. In this context, the cryptocurrency market is still adjusting, while gold continues to reach peaks and the stock market maintains a relatively strong upward trend.
What problem does Vanar Chain solve that Ethereum L2 has yet to address?
Once, I tried to build a simple interaction flow on an Ethereum L2: storing state, updating user data, and then responding almost in real-time.
Everything worked, but it always felt like I was taking the "scenic route." The fees weren't too high, but latency and complexity were still present.
@Vanarchain approaches the problem from a different angle. Instead of optimizing for DeFi or composability, it focuses on applications with high interaction frequency like games and entertainment.
Vanar accepts data separation: on-chain only retains what is needed for integrity, while off-chain handles the heavy lifting and continuous changes.
This enables faster responses and more stable costs for end users.
Ethereum L2 addresses scalability for Ethereum. Vanar addresses the experience for a specific group of applications. It's not a replacement, but an alternative.
The trade-off lies in the level of decentralization and standardization. However, for applications that require speed and continuous interaction rhythm, Vanar is targeting a gap that L2 still leaves open.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
Once, I tried to build a simple interaction flow on an Ethereum L2: storing state, updating user data, and then responding almost in real-time.
Everything worked, but it always felt like I was taking the "scenic route." The fees weren't too high, but latency and complexity were still present.
@Vanarchain approaches the problem from a different angle. Instead of optimizing for DeFi or composability, it focuses on applications with high interaction frequency like games and entertainment.
Vanar accepts data separation: on-chain only retains what is needed for integrity, while off-chain handles the heavy lifting and continuous changes.
This enables faster responses and more stable costs for end users.
Ethereum L2 addresses scalability for Ethereum. Vanar addresses the experience for a specific group of applications. It's not a replacement, but an alternative.
The trade-off lies in the level of decentralization and standardization. However, for applications that require speed and continuous interaction rhythm, Vanar is targeting a gap that L2 still leaves open.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
Why is Plasma called the "blockchain dedicated to USDT"?
Plasma $XPL , as I see it, is likened to the "blockchain dedicated to USDT" because it effectively addresses two things that any chain wants when transferring stablecoins: gas fees and speed.
Normally, if you transfer USDT on the Ethereum or Tron network, you must have ETH or TRX in your wallet to pay the fees.
But with Plasma, the interesting part is that you can transfer USDT completely free thanks to the "Fee Abstraction" mechanism. This means you don't need to hold the original token $XPL to still transfer money.
I frequently trade on dex, so this is very convenient, especially since gas fees on Ethereum are extremely high before the upgrade. Spending several hundred dollars and incurring tens of dollars in fees is extremely unreasonable.
In my opinion, Plasma appears as a "lifeline" with transaction fees close to zero and a verification speed measured in seconds, making it very convenient for users.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
Plasma $XPL , as I see it, is likened to the "blockchain dedicated to USDT" because it effectively addresses two things that any chain wants when transferring stablecoins: gas fees and speed.
Normally, if you transfer USDT on the Ethereum or Tron network, you must have ETH or TRX in your wallet to pay the fees.
But with Plasma, the interesting part is that you can transfer USDT completely free thanks to the "Fee Abstraction" mechanism. This means you don't need to hold the original token $XPL to still transfer money.
I frequently trade on dex, so this is very convenient, especially since gas fees on Ethereum are extremely high before the upgrade. Spending several hundred dollars and incurring tens of dollars in fees is extremely unreasonable.
In my opinion, Plasma appears as a "lifeline" with transaction fees close to zero and a verification speed measured in seconds, making it very convenient for users.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
Ethereum reaches record transactions, fees remain low compared to the 2021 cycle
Transaction volume on Ethereum has now reached an all-time high, but for me, what’s more noteworthy is that transaction fees are still far from the peak in 2021.
Currently, the network is processing about 3 times the number of transactions, while the total costs users have to pay are only nearly 1/3 compared to the previous peak period.
For me, this is not a coincidence. In 2021, most fees came from speculative activities, where users were willing to pay very high prices just to be prioritized in short-term frenzies. Now, the picture is different.
Currently, the network is processing about 3 times the number of transactions, while the total costs users have to pay are only nearly 1/3 compared to the previous peak period.
For me, this is not a coincidence. In 2021, most fees came from speculative activities, where users were willing to pay very high prices just to be prioritized in short-term frenzies. Now, the picture is different.
Bitcoin has not caught up with gold in the context of increasing global liquidity
$BTC only has one chance to make the strongest catch-up phase in this entire cycle.
Since December, global liquidity has started to expand again. New money is no longer tightening as it did before, but is gradually seeking assets that can hold their value and reflect macro expectations.
In the first upward trend, gold is clearly the most beneficial asset, absorbing almost all the momentum of the new liquidity wave, while Bitcoin seems slow and left behind.
Since December, global liquidity has started to expand again. New money is no longer tightening as it did before, but is gradually seeking assets that can hold their value and reflect macro expectations.
In the first upward trend, gold is clearly the most beneficial asset, absorbing almost all the momentum of the new liquidity wave, while Bitcoin seems slow and left behind.
Altcoin/BTC after the bearish cycle since 2022: Reversal signals gradually emerging
ALTCOINS / BTC
If I look at the long-term frame, this structure is actually quite clear. Since 2022, altcoins have continuously weakened against
, creating a series of lower highs and lower lows extending.
For me, this is no longer a typical correction, but a downtrend long enough and deep enough to form a large descending wedge pattern, which usually appears in the later stages of a bearish cycle.
If I look at the long-term frame, this structure is actually quite clear. Since 2022, altcoins have continuously weakened against
, creating a series of lower highs and lower lows extending.
For me, this is no longer a typical correction, but a downtrend long enough and deep enough to form a large descending wedge pattern, which usually appears in the later stages of a bearish cycle.
Potential Points of Centralization in Vanar Chain Infrastructure
One evening I tried to redeploy a small contract on Vanar, not to do anything big, just to test the data flow and system response.
Everything runs quite smoothly. Transactions confirm quickly, data returns neatly.
But precisely because it is so smooth, I start to wonder: in a system strongly optimized for such experience, where are the actual points of centralization?
Vanar positions itself as a friendly infrastructure for games, entertainment, and high-interaction applications.
Bitcoin drops to record low valuation compared to gold, market signals imbalance
Bitcoin – if viewed as 'digital gold' – is in an unusually cheap state compared to physical gold. And this is not just a feeling, but something that is clearly reflected in the data.
The 2-week RSI of the $BTC /gold ratio has just fallen to around 29, the lowest level ever recorded. The signals on the weekly and monthly frames are similar.
While gold is rising strongly as a traditional safe-haven asset, Bitcoin has been price-constrained for a long time, causing the valuation gap between these two 'golds' to widen.
The 2-week RSI of the $BTC /gold ratio has just fallen to around 29, the lowest level ever recorded. The signals on the weekly and monthly frames are similar.
While gold is rising strongly as a traditional safe-haven asset, Bitcoin has been price-constrained for a long time, causing the valuation gap between these two 'golds' to widen.
The Position of Plasma XPL in the Current Scaling Picture of Ethereum
If you look at the picture of scaling Ethereum from a distance, it is easy to feel that everything has been 'determined'.
Rollup is everywhere. Optimistic, ZK, app-rollup, shared sequencer, DA layer... Each update cycle adds a new piece to the puzzle.
But the more I look closely, the more I see that picture is not yet closed. It is just delving deeper into a single assumption: on-chain data is the price to pay for absolute safety.
And it is precisely here that Plasma XPL has a very different position, even somewhat uncomfortable if viewed from a rollup-centric mindset.
The Bitcoin market enters a critical phase
The market $BTC is entering a sensitive phase as actual profit and loss flows decline sharply. The rush of profit-taking at the beginning and end of 2024 has created momentum for clear price increases, but the recent rise in actual losses indicates that surrender pressure is quietly forming beneath the surface of the market.
In the short term, such decline phases often occur in the final distribution stage, when the upward momentum begins to slow down and the market becomes more selective with cash flow. This is not necessarily an immediate reversal signal, but it is rarely an easy trading phase.
In the short term, such decline phases often occur in the final distribution stage, when the upward momentum begins to slow down and the market becomes more selective with cash flow. This is not necessarily an immediate reversal signal, but it is rarely an easy trading phase.
How does Vanar Chain handle on-chain / off-chain data?
Today is the start of the week, so I tried to see how an application on @Vanarchain Vanar processes user data.
The first thing I noticed was not the speed, but the feeling... light. There aren't too many things pushed onto the on-chain in a forced manner.
Vanar seems to accept a rather straightforward reality: blockchain shouldn't store everything. On-chain only keeps what is necessary for integrity – state, ownership, contract logic, and reference hashes. This part acts as the final ledger, where trust in others is unnecessary.
Heavier data like media, large metadata, or user behavior is processed off-chain.
This helps reduce costs and provides faster responses, especially for entertainment applications. In return, the system must manage the connection between these two layers well.
This division is not perfect, but at least it acknowledges the limitations of blockchain, rather than pretending that everything should be on-chain.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
Today is the start of the week, so I tried to see how an application on @Vanarchain Vanar processes user data.
The first thing I noticed was not the speed, but the feeling... light. There aren't too many things pushed onto the on-chain in a forced manner.
Vanar seems to accept a rather straightforward reality: blockchain shouldn't store everything. On-chain only keeps what is necessary for integrity – state, ownership, contract logic, and reference hashes. This part acts as the final ledger, where trust in others is unnecessary.
Heavier data like media, large metadata, or user behavior is processed off-chain.
This helps reduce costs and provides faster responses, especially for entertainment applications. In return, the system must manage the connection between these two layers well.
This division is not perfect, but at least it acknowledges the limitations of blockchain, rather than pretending that everything should be on-chain.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
@Plasma is one of the names that made me stop and observe longer than usual, not because of a new narrative, but because it touches on an old question: What does DeFi really need to exist sustainably.
If looking at the surface, Plasma $XPL promises high throughput, low cost, and better scalability compared to many current L1s.
But DeFi doesn't die because of high fees; it dies because the underlying assumptions are broken when the system is under pressure. The question is not how fast it is, but when there is a problem, who controls it, who stops the system, and whether users can withdraw their money.
One point I noticed about Plasma XPL is how they approach execution and control. The structure allows for performance optimization but at the same time shifts some power towards the operators.
For DeFi builders, this is both attractive and dangerous. Attractive because you have a stable, predictable environment that is easy to design products for. Dangerous because the line between 'technical optimization' and 'centralization' is very thin.
DeFi, at a deeper level, is not about UI or APY. It is the belief that when things go wrong, the system still operates according to the established rules.
If Plasma XPL can prove that the mechanisms for pause, upgrade, or intervention are designed transparently, with clear limits, then this is a platform worth building on.
So, is Plasma XPL suitable for building DeFi? Maybe. But only suitable for teams that understand clearly.
#Plasma @Plasma $XPL
If looking at the surface, Plasma $XPL promises high throughput, low cost, and better scalability compared to many current L1s.
But DeFi doesn't die because of high fees; it dies because the underlying assumptions are broken when the system is under pressure. The question is not how fast it is, but when there is a problem, who controls it, who stops the system, and whether users can withdraw their money.
One point I noticed about Plasma XPL is how they approach execution and control. The structure allows for performance optimization but at the same time shifts some power towards the operators.
For DeFi builders, this is both attractive and dangerous. Attractive because you have a stable, predictable environment that is easy to design products for. Dangerous because the line between 'technical optimization' and 'centralization' is very thin.
DeFi, at a deeper level, is not about UI or APY. It is the belief that when things go wrong, the system still operates according to the established rules.
If Plasma XPL can prove that the mechanisms for pause, upgrade, or intervention are designed transparently, with clear limits, then this is a platform worth building on.
So, is Plasma XPL suitable for building DeFi? Maybe. But only suitable for teams that understand clearly.
#Plasma @Plasma $XPL
Ethereum Transaction Activity Soars in Q1 2026
The number of transactions per second across the entire Ethereum ecosystem is increasing rapidly in a very short time.
Daily transaction volume has surged from around 230 transactions per second to over 1,800 transactions per second in just a few days.
Notably, most of this activity is no longer taking place on the Ethereum mainnet but has been shifted to layer 2 solutions. Currently, Layer 2 solutions are handling up to 98.51% of the total transaction volume of the ecosystem.
Daily transaction volume has surged from around 230 transactions per second to over 1,800 transactions per second in just a few days.
Notably, most of this activity is no longer taking place on the Ethereum mainnet but has been shifted to layer 2 solutions. Currently, Layer 2 solutions are handling up to 98.51% of the total transaction volume of the ecosystem.
Ethereum Q1/2026: When the 'Giant' Awakens After the Accumulation Phase
My view on Ethereum in Q1/2026 is positive in the medium term, although the short term may still see a lot of volatility.
At this stage, ETH is gradually moving beyond its role as a purely speculative asset to become an important part of the infrastructure of the digital financial system.
As of the end of January 2026, the price $ETH fluctuates around the $2,950 area, reflecting a relatively clear accumulation phase. Despite pressure from macro factors, the price structure still maintains higher lows, indicating that the long-term upward trend has not been broken.
At this stage, ETH is gradually moving beyond its role as a purely speculative asset to become an important part of the infrastructure of the digital financial system.
As of the end of January 2026, the price $ETH fluctuates around the $2,950 area, reflecting a relatively clear accumulation phase. Despite pressure from macro factors, the price structure still maintains higher lows, indicating that the long-term upward trend has not been broken.
Strategy Sends Signal That May Increase Bitcoin Holdings
Michael Saylor just sent out a familiar but not vague signal: Strategy may continue to buy more $BTC . No need for a loud declaration, just a light hint is enough for the market to understand the message behind.
Looking at the history of Strategy, one can see a consistent philosophy: accumulate Bitcoin for the long term, without wavering according to short-term cycles.
They do not buy out of excitement, nor do they sell out of fear. Buying BTC is seen as restructuring the balance sheet, not a 'trade deal'.
Looking at the history of Strategy, one can see a consistent philosophy: accumulate Bitcoin for the long term, without wavering according to short-term cycles.
They do not buy out of excitement, nor do they sell out of fear. Buying BTC is seen as restructuring the balance sheet, not a 'trade deal'.
Can Dusk become the infrastructure for RWA?
@Dusk
hello everyone today I scroll square and see many people discussing
Every time I hear someone talk about RWA, I always reflexively step back a beat.
Not because this concept is new or far-fetched, but because it carries a heavy chain of assumptions about trust, legality, and humans — things that crypto does not handle well unless we look straight into their dark sides.
Dusk appears in this story as quite an enticing promise: an infrastructure focused on privacy, compliance, and tokenizing real-world assets.
hello everyone today I scroll square and see many people discussing
Every time I hear someone talk about RWA, I always reflexively step back a beat.
Not because this concept is new or far-fetched, but because it carries a heavy chain of assumptions about trust, legality, and humans — things that crypto does not handle well unless we look straight into their dark sides.
Dusk appears in this story as quite an enticing promise: an infrastructure focused on privacy, compliance, and tokenizing real-world assets.
Dusk Network and the Trend of Security Tokenization
If we look at tokenizing securities from outside crypto, I think it’s easy to see a paradox: everyone says this is the future of finance, but very few systems are actually being used in real operations.
The reason does not lie in the blockchain not being fast enough or cheap enough.
It lies in the fact that most Web3 infrastructure is designed for DeFi, while securities live in a completely different world—where compliance, privacy, and legal responsibilities are far more important than composability or permissionless.
Login to explore more contents