阿木木_枯坐打狗版

A statement that will get you flamed:
Most of the memes today don't even deserve to be called memes.
The memes of the past had a foundation. They were fun, funny, and could be repeated; the community created them organically, playing with and sharing the jokes, and the currency was just a label applied later.

You might forget the price, but you'll definitely remember that meme.
Back then, memes could sustain consensus for a few months, even a year.
It wasn't about how great the project was; it was that everyone was genuinely sharing the same joke,
the community truly had faith.

And now?
Many BSC memes have become industrialized to a terrifying extent:
A phrase → Find a perspective → Name it
The front enters → Pull a string → Wait for people to follow → Crash
From start to finish, not a single step is fun.

When the front enters, retail investors think this is consensus;
When the front crashes, they realize it's just a rhythm.

In the past: the community existed first, and the price followed;
Now: the price is pulled first, and the community is forcefully created.

You might not even remember what it's called, and it has already gone to zero.

So the problem isn't that memes die quickly,

but rather— they never had any memes to begin with.
Without a foundation, no one repeats;
Without repetition, there’s no community;
Without a community, there can be no consensus.
What’s left is just a race of who runs fast and who survives in a PVP.

What is a true meme?
It’s not about watching K-lines, but being willing to stay in the group and watch people play with jokes;
It’s being able to be dug up and continue to be teased or recreated after a few months.

Not about fixating on who said something or posted a tweet, searching for angles to issue coins, and then asking— should we sell now?

So it’s not that the meme track is failing; it’s that too many people treat narrative angles as culture.
A coin without consensus can only rely on the next person to take over;
A meme without memorable points is destined to live only a day.

A true meme is one that can be remembered.
If it’s not memorable, even if it rises, it’s just a one-time consumable.

Why can some chains constantly create myths, while others can only PVP to death?
The answer is cruel: the cultural attributes of the chain have already written the ending from the very beginning.

Sol's childhood memories are of the bonk and wif era's 'old-fashioned zoo'.

Pump changed the way assets are issued, igniting the meme of the new era, but in the early days, there was almost no strong individualistic intervention from official sources, so cats and dogs, various cults naturally grew.

BSC truly became popular starting from tst.
But right from the start, it was heavily focused on personal worship—the ceiling was opened by the officials themselves.
At the same time, the cat and dog memes had already been thoroughly demystified by the market, leading to the wave of Chinese coins in October.

The fact that Chinese coins can become popular itself indicates that:
meme can no longer be played with.

This is the meme of the end times.
The model is different from inscriptions and NFTs; it's not that it can't be played, it's just that it can only be PVP.
In the end, whether you win or lose, you have to accept it.

@Binance BiBi summary of this content

Through this Binance wallet competition, I have seen a few cruel but practical truths.
币安钱包链上交易体验赛
First: You must be an 'early bird'.
Every hot signal on BSC must be watched, monitored, and followed.
Don't get tangled up in whether it's insider information - the early market gives you not insider info, but opportunities.
Every meme from Er Sheng must be locked in as soon as there is some movement.

The so-called early market is that golden window where market value is in the tens of K to hundreds of K.
And now there are so many tools and bots to capture early market signals that you can't choose from them all.
Watching the early market = watching for life.

Second: Being willing to make mistakes is more important than whether you can read charts. Don't go all in at once.
Do you have 10,000 U? Great.
BSC will periodically reveal batches of new hot memes, as long as you can grasp a bit of perspective, invest 1000 U each time in the early market, ten times.
As long as you hit it once out of ten with a hundred times return: directly turning 10,000 into 100,000.
This probability is much higher than in Macau -
Because BSC's hotspots are concentrated, singular, and not dispersed; opportunities appear densely.

Currently, the front row rankings of the Binance wallet activity are almost all players who got on DORY in the early market.
If there are no new hotspots coming up, the ranking pattern may not change again.

In summary:
The early market is a ticket, trial and error is capital, and not going all in is the underlying logic for survival.

BSC Level 1 Major Event: He Yi downplays the impact of "official IP derivatives" Meme, funds on the BSC chain shift towards community-driven Memes

On December 12, He Yi stated in response to community discussions yesterday: "Everyone doesn't need to find angles in the official V or from the editor, this type of Meme will not be looked at in the future." This statement has led to a reassessment of the asset structure on the BSC chain, pushing funds to shift from "official IP derivatives" Memes to community-driven Memes.

The previously popular "official IP derivative" Meme coin "bibi" faced a sell-off after He Yi's remarks, dropping 30% within 24 hours, now reported at 0.004 USD. Related coins like "PALU" and "DOYR" also generally declined. This trend resonates with the recent discussions raised by the community and KOLs about the "de-officialization" of the BSC chain, reflecting some investors' desire to reduce the weight of official association concepts in the BSC ecosystem.

Meanwhile, community-driven Meme coins have garnered favor from investors. The representative Meme "Hakimi" rose 22% within 24 hours, now reported at 0.029 USD; similar assets like "Vulgar Penguin" have also maintained relatively high levels after an increase. Additionally, with Binance soon to support UTF-8 format (allowing for Chinese trading pairs), some traders are preemptively positioning themselves in Chinese-related assets, further driving funds towards related Chinese community-type Memes.

@Binance BiBi

How absurd is the degree of fragmentation in the BSC primary market now?
In the same market, retail investors in the group are howling in loss;
while those few p players can still make tens of thousands to millions of U in a month, earning more steadily than a money printer.
This scene is truly fragmented.

Why?
Because the pvp culture of BSC has turned the market into a battlefield.
Those who have been mingling in the front line for a long time know:
There are a few p players who don’t care about narratives, aesthetics, or perspectives—
As long as they’re at the bottom, they dare to go in;
Then it's a matter of seconds to sell off, specifically targeting those following their trades.
To be honest, with this strategy, I could also make money.

But what’s most confusing is—
Retail investors still rush to follow, contributing liquidity to them.
It’s like actively donating blood to a vampire, making it hard to understand and wanting to shake people off.

What’s the result?
Now, with a new token, as long as the p players don’t participate, no one dares to play;
Once the p players are in, liquidity is directly drained by them.
The upper limit is locked from the second of its birth.
Bad money drives out worse money, and in the end, only they are left playing with each other's health bars.

The heavier the pvp,
the faster retail investors lose,
the more enjoyable it is for the p players to earn.

When will retail investors have their own aesthetics?
When will they stop chasing the p players' trades and stop actively providing liquidity?
On that day, this market may finally be a bit healthier.

Most people get stuck at the first million, not because they don't work hard, but because the rules are fundamentally different.

Poor people use the POW model: they compete with physical strength, time, and desperately exchange effort for money.
Rich people operate on the POS model: the more money they have, the faster their returns, they can even get rich while lying down.

The world is inherently unfair.
Especially in modern finance—it is designed as alchemy for the wealthy.

Those with principal only need to avoid reckless actions; a basic understanding of average levels is enough for them to snowball their wealth;
but for those without principal?
You must acknowledge a harsh reality: luck accounts for at least 30%; otherwise, you won't even have a chance to break through.

Projecting back to the crypto world is even simpler—
With a small principal, don't talk about perspective, don't talk about value investing, don't talk about being friends with time.
You are not qualified to be friends with time; what you need to do is—
Be the enemy of the principal. You need to eliminate it and let it grow.

Once the principal starts rolling,
only then do you have “perspective.”
Only then do you have “value.”
Only then do you qualify to talk about your first million.

When you are being messed with by foreigners, you will realize how simple BSC is.
Don't forget the well digger when you drink water, okay?

The secondary market is being hard-controlled and standardized by the United States to transform into "Wall Street's playground." The real opportunities in Web3 seem to be increasingly like returning to the primary market—the place where the rules at least can still be seen.
Retail investors in the secondary market? Always the last to know the script in the plot.
You think you're trading coins, but in fact, you're just a liquidity patch for the big players.

In the primary market, we at least know:
Top ten holders' share
The extent of big players' control
The risks of insider trading

But what about the secondary market?
Strongly controlled coins are everywhere, and insider trading is as pervasive as the air.

The fate of most retail investors:
Frequent trading → Going to zero
Hoping to get rich → A single leveraged liquidation returns to the market
Missing out on gains, fully experiencing losses

The 1011 incident made it clearer:
Retail investors and even small institutions cannot even be considered "counterparties" in front of the big players; they are just lambs to the slaughter.
Where is the game here? This is a dimensional slaughter.
What's harsher is that the United States is now promoting crypto taxes globally.
This wave of selling is essentially about:
Asian people freely trading chips → Chips clearing → The prelude to Wall Street taking over BTC.

The rhythm in the future will turn into:
Bitcoin = Wall Street's home ground
Institutional bull markets are not retail bull markets
Web3 bull markets ≠ Retail bull markets

In the future, Web3 will become increasingly institutionalized.
The only path for retail investors to survive is:
Stay away from random gambling and embrace certain structures.

The primary market is the closest place for ordinary people to get rich.
Hitting dogs is not gambling; it's a game of information disparity.
Master the methods, train your own trading patterns, and you can catch your own single coin A7 dog!

Elon Musk and Jensen Huang recently share a common viewpoint: the essence of Bitcoin is to convert excess energy into digital assets.

Many people are discussing whether energy currency is a better narrative than digital gold?

Digital gold is a grand narrative, while energy currency has inherent logic. The grand narrative captures immediate interest, while the inherent logic helps to understand the essence of operation $BTC
#比特币VS代币化黄金 #比特币生态