rameet_14

On, january 13 @Binance Square Official launched an surprise drop event for 100 creators (10BNB DAILY) (1BNB PER CREATORS)
first off, Congratulation to every Winner..!
ALSO, the new users this event is for you too, don't missed it out. So, the Main event start from today, In the previous Round you can see 100BNB, this time reward has been DOUBLE then last time, 200BNB
The rewards distribution is same as the last time
(10BNB DAILY) (1BNB PER CREATORS)
And the rules is also the same.
Lets Focus on our main topic.
What people think? Binance choose an Content creator with high engagement, but that's not how binance choose the winner. What you really need is.
1. You content should be Orginal (Do not copy other creators content, do not use robot, No matter how your content is try your own)
2. High Quality (post an content with uniques ideas, thoughts something other creators haven't post yet, the more you share fresh content, more you get a chance)
3. Coins tag (the main role of the post) you have to share an post with coin tags (e.g $BNB $ETH
Join now and Get a Surprise Drop. You can never be an winner if you try.

Every public blockchain shares the same flaw:
it reveals everything.
Wallets, balances, counterparties, transaction flows — all exposed forever. That level of transparency might work for memes and speculation, but it completely breaks when institutions, real assets, and regulations come into play.
Dusk Network saw this early.
So instead of hiding data later, it built Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) into the core of the chain itself.
What If You Could Prove Everything… Without Revealing Anything?
That’s the promise of Zero-Knowledge Proofs.
On Dusk, ZKPs allow users to prove that:
a transaction is valid
rules are followed
balances are correct
without revealing who sent it, who received it, or how much moved.
Not “trust me.”

Not “check off-chain.”

Cryptographic proof.
Smart Contracts That Don’t Leak Secrets
Here’s where things get serious.
Most smart contracts are transparent. Everyone sees the logic. Everyone sees the data. That’s fine — until you deal with financial agreements, compliance rules, or investor data.
Dusk introduces confidential smart contracts.
Using ZKPs, contracts can:
execute logic on private inputs
enforce rules silently
prove outcomes without exposing state
Think eligibility checks, settlements, and financial conditions — all verified, none exposed.
Privacy That Regulators Can Still Verify
Privacy usually scares regulators.

Dusk flips that narrative.
With selective disclosure, data stays private by default — but proofs can be revealed to authorized parties like auditors or regulators when required.
No mass surveillance.

No full-chain exposure.

Just compliance, on demand.
This is why Dusk is built for regulated markets, not just DeFi experiments.
Tokenized Assets, Powered by ZK Proofs
Dusk’s Confidential Security Contracts (XSC) embed compliance directly into tokens using ZKPs.
KYC checks
jurisdiction rules
transfer limits
All enforced on-chain — without exposing investor identities or positions.
This is what real-world asset tokenization actually needs.
Most blockchains say:
Everything is transparent — deal with it.
Dusk says:
Everything is verifiable — without being visible.
That single design choice unlocks:
Institutional adoption
real-world assets
regulated on-chain finance
Not tomorrow. Now.
Zero-Knowledge Proofs aren’t a feature on Dusk Network.

They are the foundation.
In a future where trillions in real assets move on-chain, privacy with proof won’t be optional — it will be mandatory.
And that’s exactly what Dusk is building.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK

Decentralized storage has come a long way, but one challenge has persisted: small file storage at scale. While solutions like Filecoin and Arweave excel at storing large media, storing thousands of small files — NFT assets, AI outputs, logs, or chat records — has remained costly and inefficient. Developers often had to bundle files manually, adding overhead and complexity.
Walrus Protocol’s Quilt changes this paradigm. Quilt is a protocol-native batch storage system that groups hundreds of small files into a single object while preserving individual file access and metadata. This approach slashes storage overhead, cuts costs dramatically, and simplifies developer workflows.
How Quilt Works
Instead of uploading each small file separately, Quilt bundles them into a single “Quilt” unit. Each file retains a unique Patch ID and metadata, allowing developers to access, filter, and manage individual files without unpacking the entire batch. Its developer-friendly API supports bulk uploads, making small file storage both efficient and practical.
This protocol-level batching solves the inefficiencies that previously plagued decentralized apps and opens new opportunities for applications that rely on high volumes of small data.
Efficiency and Cost Savings
Quilt’s impact is measurable. For small files around 10 KB, storage overhead can drop by over 400× compared to storing files individually. Even files of 100 KB see a 100× reduction in costs. These savings make decentralized storage viable for use cases that were previously uneconomic, from NFT collections to AI datasets.
Quilt enables developers to.
Scale NFT Platforms: Store large collections efficiently without prohibitive costs.
Support AI Workflows: Batch model outputs, logs, and training data seamlessly.
Enhance Decentralized Apps: Manage millions of small files quickly and affordably.
By embedding batching, indexing, and low-latency access at the protocol level, Quilt eliminates awkward workarounds and reduces operational complexity for developers.
Why Quilt Matters for Web3
Quilt completes Walrus Protocol’s vision of a universal, scalable storage layer. Before Quilt, Walrus was ideal for large files but struggled with high-volume small file use cases. Now, applications can leverage a single storage system for all data types, lowering costs and boosting efficiency.
In the rapidly growing Web3 ecosystem, where NFTs, AI, and decentralized apps increasingly depend on efficient, cost-effective storage, Quilt positions Walrus as a go-to solution for next-generation applications.
@Walrus 🦭/acc #walrus $WAL

For years, blockchains have chased raw performance and ecosystem buzz. But Dusk Network has spent six years building something deeper — a privacy-centric, compliance-ready Layer 1 blockchain designed not just for DeFi speculation, but for regulated finance, real-world asset tokenization, and institutional adoption. Today, that vision hits the ground with the Dusk Mainnet rollout, a milestone with implications far beyond the crypto headlines.
From Research to Reality
After years of fundamental development, testing, and protocol maturation, Dusk initiated its Mainnet rollout in December 2024, culminating in the network producing its first immutable block on January 7, 2025. This rollout wasn’t a single flip-the-switch moment; it was a phased evolution — unfolding from on-ramp contracts and cluster deployment to full operational status.
The process involved.
Activating the Mainnet Onramp contract to port ERC-20/BEP-20 DUSK into the native environment.
Deploying the Mainnet cluster in dry-run mode, enabling stakeholders to stake DUSK and initialize genesis state.
Refreshing to operational mode, bringing full Mainnet capabilities online and launching bridges for future token migration.
This careful staging ensured stability, community participation, and primed the network for real-world use.
Not Just Another Blockchain — Built for Regulated Finance
Dusk isn’t a generic Layer 1. It’s engineered for financial markets where privacy and compliance matter as much as decentralization. The protocol combines zero-knowledge primitives with regulation-aware infrastructure that meets standards like MiCA, MiFID II, and GDPR-style regimes.
Unlike most smart contract platforms where transaction details are fully public by default, Dusk supports confidential transactions — shielding balances and flows cryptographically while still enabling authorized disclosures when required. This balance is essential for institutions that must satisfy audit, reporting, and compliance requirements without exposing sensitive data.
Mainnet Is a Foundation, Not an Endpoint
With Mainnet live, the work accelerates. The post-Mainnet roadmap is ambitious and strategic
Hyperstaking: A programmable staking framework enabling custom logic like privacy-preserving delegation, incentive schemes, and liquid staking derivatives — pushing beyond traditional fixed reward models.
Zedger Beta: A privacy-preserving asset tokenization protocol designed to bridge traditional securities and on-chain liquidity.
Lightspeed: An EVM-compatible Layer 2 that lets Ethereum-native projects interoperate while settling securely on Dusk’s base layer.
Dusk Pay: A compliant payments circuit that integrates stablecoins and regulatory support — bringing familiar payment rails into decentralized finance.
Real Activity, Real Adoption
Data since launch shows tangible network engagement and adoption patterns beyond testnet metrics. Cross-chain bridges now enable ERC-20 assets to move to Dusk while preserving privacy via zero-knowledge proofs, and public testnets like DuskEVM are opening up EVM-compatible smart contract deployment.
These capabilities give developers familiar tooling and users real utility — from staking and node operation to deploying standardized contracts with confidentiality and regulatory positioning baked in.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK

For years, Web3 has been obsessed with one metric: Transactions Per Second (TPS). It was the go-to badge of honor. Fast chains won headlines. Slow chains faced ridicule. And in the race to build scalable infrastructure, “faster” became synonymous with “better.”
But the world has changed. And Web3 hasn’t kept up.
Why TPS Was the Old Gold Standard
In the early days of Bitcoin and Ethereum, speed was everything. Bitcoin processed roughly 7 transactions per second, while Ethereum hovered around 15–30. This bottleneck created scalability debates that gave rise to Layer-2s, alternative Layer-1s, and even custom consensus models, all optimized for throughput.
What followed was a Layer-1 arms race:
Who could process the most transactions?Who had the shortest block times?Who could match Visa?
It was all about volume and velocity. But that mindset belongs to a pre-AI world.
Then Came Intelligence
The launch of ChatGPT in 2022 marked a cultural shift. Millions of users experienced, for the first time, what software could understand. It didn’t just execute commands. It reasoned. Composed. Responded with context.
And just like that, speed was no longer the benchmark. Intelligence was.
Users now expect systems to:
Predict needs.Understand intent.Adapt to behavior.
This isn’t just about chatbots. This is about the internet itself. So why is Web3 still stuck measuring TPS?
Smart ≠ Intelligent
It’s time we stop conflating “smart contracts” with actual intelligence.
Smart contracts are deterministic. They follow hardcoded rules.Intelligent infrastructure is contextual. It can interpret, evolve, and reason with data.
Think of it like this:
A smart contract is a calculator.
An intelligent system is a thinking assistant.
One runs formulas.
The other understands what the formula is for.
Vanar believes this is the critical evolution. Web3 doesn’t need more speed, it needs cognition.
TPS Doesn’t Matter If Your App Can’t Think
Most applications today still rely on humans to bridge context:
“Check this address, then that one, then compare outputs…”“Use off-chain oracles to interpret what’s on-chain…”
This isn’t scalable. Not for DeFi. Not for DAOs. Not for AI-native agents.
If we want real automation, semantic interoperability, and intelligent applications, we need chains that understand, not just store.
That’s where Vanar comes in.
From Transactions to Thoughts Per Second
Vanar isn’t optimizing for transactions per second. It’s rethinking what a blockchain can be.
Instead of building a faster engine, Vanar is building a smarter brain:
Storage that isn’t passive, but programmable.Logic that isn’t static, but adaptive.Identity that isn’t an address, but a semantic profile.
We call it "Thoughts Per Second" because that’s what will power the next internet.
The New Meta Is Here
The age of transactional flexing is over.
It’s not about how fast your chain moves.
It’s about how smart it becomes.
Vanar isn’t chasing the meta.
It’s shaping the next one.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY

One of the biggest UX problems in crypto is simple but persistent.

you can’t send money unless you already own gas.
Plasma (XPL) tackles this head-on with a dedicated USD₮ paymaster contract — a protocol-level mechanism that sponsors gas fees for USDT transfers. The result is a stablecoin payment experience that feels closer to Web2 finance, without breaking on-chain economics.
The Core Idea
Plasma is built as a stablecoin-native Layer 1. Instead of treating USDT as just another token, Plasma optimizes the chain around how stablecoins are actually used: payments, transfers, and settlement.
To enable this, Plasma includes a USD₮-specific paymaster that covers gas costs for eligible transfers — meaning users can send USDT without holding XPL at all.
No swaps.

No gas confusion.

No onboarding friction.
Step-by-Step: What Happens During a USD₮ Transfer
User initiates a USD₮ transfer

The wallet signs a normal transfer or transferFrom call on the USDT contract. From the user’s perspective, nothing is different.
Transaction requests gas sponsorship

Instead of charging the user gas in XPL, the transaction signals Plasma’s execution layer that it is eligible for paymaster handling.
USD₮ Paymaster validates the transaction
The paymaster checks
Is this a simple USD₮ transfer?
Does it meet rate limits and eligibility rules?
Is it free from spam or abuse patterns?
Paymaster pays gas in XPL

If approved, the paymaster covers the gas cost using XPL from a protocol-managed pool.
Validators include the transaction

The transaction is executed and finalized like any other on-chain action.
USD₮ is transferred — user pays zero gas

The recipient receives USDT, and the sender never touches XPL.
Why a Dedicated Paymaster Matters
Plasma doesn’t use a generic, open-ended gas sponsor.

The USD₮ paymaster is purpose-built.
It only sponsors simple USD₮ transfers
It does not cover complex DeFi or contract calls
It includes guardrails like rate limits and validation logic
This design keeps the system.
Economically sustainable
Resistant to spam
Predictable for users and wallets
In short: free where it makes sense, paid where it must be.
Protocol-Level Integration, Not a UX Hack
Most “gasless” systems rely on.
Third-party relayers
App-specific meta-transactions
Custom signing flows
Plasma’s approach is different.
The paymaster is maintained at the protocol level, deeply integrated into transaction execution. Developers don’t need to build custom relayer infrastructure, and wallets don’t need special logic beyond standard EVM flows.
For builders, it feels native.

For users, it feels invisible.
Why This Changes Stablecoin UX
Traditional blockchains assume.
Native token first, payments second.
Plasma flips this
Payments first, native token abstracted
That shift unlocks
Wallet-to-wallet USDT transfers with zero friction
Stablecoin remittances for non-crypto users
Consumer apps where users never see gas
This is how stablecoins move from “crypto tools” to financial infrastructure.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL

Most blockchains treat stablecoins like just another token. Plasma does the opposite — it designs the entire chain around stablecoins as the primary unit of value.
Stablecoins as the Default Asset
On Plasma, stablecoins aren’t secondary to volatile native tokens. The network is optimized so that stablecoins can be used as the default medium for gas, transfers, and application activity. This removes one of crypto’s biggest UX problems: forcing users to hold a volatile asset just to move digital dollars.
Predictable Fees for Predictable Money
Stablecoins are meant to represent stability — but on many chains, transaction costs fluctuate wildly. Plasma introduces stablecoin-denominated gas and fee abstraction, ensuring predictable costs. This makes it ideal for:
On-chain payroll
Merchant payments
Treasury management
High-frequency financial apps
In short, Plasma aligns monetary stability with network economics.
While users can transact in stablecoins, $XPL secures the network. Validators stake XPL, consensus is maintained through PlasmaBFT, and the chain remains performant without pushing volatility onto end users. This separation of concerns is intentional:
Stablecoins = user experience
XPL = security and incentives
Plasma is fully EVM-compatible, allowing developers to deploy existing smart contracts — but with stablecoin-first logic. DeFi, payments, and settlement apps can operate without redesigning their entire economic model around gas volatility.
Plasma isn’t competing to be a general-purpose Layer-1. It’s aiming to be financial infrastructure for stablecoin economies — where digital dollars move efficiently, predictably, and globally.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL

Blockchain is supposed to be the foundation of a decentralized internet.
But there’s one major limitation hardly anyone talks about—data storage.
Everyone’s talking about how blockchain will power the future of AI, Real-World Assets (RWA), and fully on-chain applications. But before we get there, we need to answer one very basic question.
Let’s separate myth from reality.
The Common Misconception
This statement gets thrown around a lot—but the reality is more nuanced.
Technically, you can store large files. But you probably shouldn’t. Not with how current blockchains work.
Let’s explore why 👇
The Technical Wall
Most blockchains today—Ethereum, Solana, Avalanche, even Bitcoin—weren’t built for storing data. They were built to record state changes (like transactions), not house full-sized files.
Here are the three biggest issues:
1. Storage Is Insanely Expensive
On Ethereum, storing 1GB of data can cost over $100,000 in gas fees.
Yes, you read that right.
That’s because blockchain storage is priced in gas, and each byte of data comes with an execution cost. The result? Storing even a simple image or document on-chain becomes cost-prohibitive for most use cases.
2. Most “On-Chain” Apps Aren’t Really On-Chain
Take NFTs, for example.
Most NFT metadata (and actual media) isn’t stored on the blockchain—it’s stored on IPFS or other off-chain storage solutions. The smart contract just points to where the file lives.
What this means:
If the off-chain file disappears, your NFT is broken.If the storage host fails, your “ownership” vanishes.You didn’t really own it in the first place.
This applies to AI models, real-world documents, and game assets too. Most apps claiming to be "on-chain" are really just wrappers for centralized storage.
3. Retrieval and Speed Are a Mess
Even when data is stored on-chain, retrieving it is often slow and fragmented. Blockchains aren't optimized for data queries. They’re optimized for immutability and consensus.
If you need to fetch structured datasets in real-time—for AI, finance, analytics, or even RWA pricing models—you’ll likely end up back on centralized servers to avoid delays.
So... What’s the Point of “On-Chain” If the Data Isn’t There?
This is the elephant in the room.
We say we want full decentralization. Yet most of today’s "Web3" stack still relies on:
Off-chain storageCentralized APIsFragile infrastructure
The Fix? It Starts with Storage.
New solutions are emerging—approaches that rethink how data lives on-chain from the ground up.
Not just indexing files. Not just pointing to IPFS.
But actual, scalable, affordable, native on-chain storage.
The next evolution of blockchain won’t just verify transactions.
It will store real data, enable real ownership, and support real on-chain AI and applications.
A breakthrough is coming.
And when it does—everything changes.
The fix has a name.
And it’s coming from Vanar.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY