Does it matter whether the U.S. and Iran are talking?
#特朗普称美伊已对话# #特朗普考虑结束伊朗冲突 Trump said "Iran is talking to him", which is essentially not information disclosure, but a signal of game theory release. When a hardliner after extreme pressure begins to actively release the signal that "the other side is talking", it indicates two things: first, the conflict has reached a marginal constraint, and the cost of further escalation is rising rapidly; second, internal and external pressures are beginning to force it to seek a way to step down. This is almost the same script as the rhythm of the China-U.S. trade war in April 2025: at that time, tariffs were pushed to over 100%, approaching "half-decoupling", but just at the tightest stage, Trump began to intensively suggest "China is talking". The Chinese side clearly denied it, but the key is not in "whether there is talk", but in "why he says there is talk". Essentially, both economic constraints (inflation, corporate costs, market fluctuations) and political constraints (elections, industries, allies) are simultaneously rising, and the opponent has actually obtained bargaining chips and entered the "negotiable range".
Trump: No more fighting, we're negotiating now. Iran: There are no negotiations, I don't know. Trump: Stop pretending, we just had skewers together last night.
I have a question❓ How is this rate defined? It is said that if there is more short selling, it results in a negative rate, and short sellers have to pay fees? But shouldn’t every 1U short position correspond to a 1U long position? They are trading against each other. Why is there talk about long and short positions?
$MYX Steady collection of fees, ultimately delisting. This is the script I wrote for him. No one dares to go long here, and no one will take over; the dogs can't exit. Only reference the alpaca. Of course, those going long here will also lose money.
The traditional mechanism of pumping and dumping has already failed. New mechanism: charging rate for pumping, delisting during sideways market. A -2% collection method every hour. Binance plays the role of an accomplice.
The fool $merl has been unable to sell after buying, forced to lose 7 points, how can one earn points like this? Losing $500 and still can't sell???? Users come to earn points, and you start playing with technology?? @Binance Wallet @Yi He @CZ what is going on
BlockBeats News, on May 23, according to Lookonchain monitoring, Jump Crypto's wallet 'Gtxgn' received 2 million SOON tokens a day ago and transferred 301 SOON to the Gate deposit address for testing.
Jump Crypto may be one of the market makers for SOON.
Now hearing the term market maker is a headache, well, as expected, hello to the dumpers. $son
Sigh, the same old market maker. Users don't need this kind of market maker anymore. Bringing in trading competitions for everyone to participate in and decentralized market making is much better than this trash that only sells. It doesn't even require that much money.
The Legend of Big Hair $soon Many people have waited a week for points only to get 190 points and a result of 90U.
Well, I know the l2 project is really bad right now, but strangely, such a large project should have decent pre-heating and hype. Although it has only been listed on Binance and OK contracts, it has also been listed in Korea. Why is it so quiet?
So when things don't make sense, I'm willing to take a gamble and bought a little at 0.45, with a market cap of 80 million. Let's see if the market has improved a bit?
Some people feel that the current point trading is serious, but in reality, the instantaneous buying and selling prices have deviated from the normal market price by about 1%. When buying, you need to pay 1% more, and when selling, 1% less. Buying immediately incurs a 1% loss, and you must hold the purchase for a while to wait for the price to recover, but be aware that this may lead to significant losses.
Why not place a limit order? First of all, limit orders also incur about 0.15% in fees, and due to depth issues, limit orders generally cannot be executed. Only when there is a significant drop or surge can they be executed.
The more people change, the less each person changes. What about yesterday's Nxpc? I want to change it all, who will provide Nxpc. Do you believe that if you roll to the end, 100 points can be exchanged for 100U?
金狗挖掘机
·
--
Previously, it was said: Alpha is great, we should grind for Alpha! Is it still good now, or are we still grinding? There must be a lot of complaints, right?
I have an idea that can allow everyone to continue enjoying the game:
1. Since there is a consumption system, points should be permanently accumulated. After all, points are everyone's contribution to Alpha; they can only be consumed and should not disappear over time.
2. The current high airdrop threshold indeed blocks and eliminates many regular users, ultimately diminishing everyone's enjoyment of participation. Instead, how about changing it to: Users with 100+ points can use their points to participate in a lottery airdrop. Users with high scores can invest more points for more chances to win, while those with low scores can invest fewer points for fewer chances, focusing on allowing everyone to participate and experience the surprise of winning (perhaps some might hit the jackpot, and others might enjoy multiple wins!).
With this dual approach, fair and just, everyone participates, and the fun is abundant. Wouldn't that be great?
Statement I have never disparaged Binance Alpha on Twitter or other social platforms. I am actually a loyal long-term customer of Binance. After much thought, I realized that Binance Alpha is the hope for those looking to profit. Sometimes making a decision is difficult, and after many days and nights of contemplation, I have decided to continue participating in Binance Alpha. As for other PUA projects, I wish them all the best.
Bye-bye
·
--
Fortunately, I didn't take that $20 idiot from the day before yesterday, almost missed out on $500 #ALPH $NXPC