Latosha Sigmond wY80
1.0K+ Following
847 Followers
566 Liked
18 Shared
Posts
All
Quotes
Videos
Your post is a very accurate analysis of the current situation. Iran is trying to turn the Strait of Hormuz into a "crypto customs" to evade the collapse of its local currency and banking sanctions, using blockchain technology as its latest financial lifeline.
But stablecoins are the biggest risk for Iran.
If the issuer (Tether or Circle) decides to cooperate with the OFAC, it can "turn off" Iran's money with a click. That's why they are pressuring China and the BRICS to generate their own stablecoins or CDBC.
But stablecoins are the biggest risk for Iran.
If the issuer (Tether or Circle) decides to cooperate with the OFAC, it can "turn off" Iran's money with a click. That's why they are pressuring China and the BRICS to generate their own stablecoins or CDBC.
BeInCrypto ES
·
--
The toll of Hormuz in Iran could be charged in stablecoins, not in Bitcoin: Chainalysis
Iran is demanding payments in cryptocurrencies from oil tankers transiting through the Strait of Hormuz. Hamid Hosseini, spokesperson for the Union of Exporters of Oil, Gas and Petrochemical Products of Iran, specifically mentioned Bitcoin (BTC) in a recent statement.
However, Chainalysis suggests that stablecoins could be the preferred instrument, in line with how the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has historically moved money.
Stablecoins fit into Iran's strategy
However, Chainalysis suggests that stablecoins could be the preferred instrument, in line with how the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has historically moved money.
Stablecoins fit into Iran's strategy
God will not forgive us eternally
I think the terms got a bit swapped in the title.
It looks more like we're facing a dollar with an increasingly dark future and a Bitcoin resurgence that's very likely (if not inevitable) in the medium to long term.
The United States already has the largest debt in its history, surpassing $39 trillion. Much of it is financed simply by issuing more debt. This can hold up in the short term, but the hole keeps getting bigger.
On top of that, with the “America First” policy, several major countries (China, Russia, and others in the BRICS bloc) are accelerating agreements to trade in their own currencies. We're seeing more and more oil and commodity transactions in yuan. Europe, for its part, is also reducing its exposure to U.S. bonds — not just because of tariffs, but especially due to the loss of confidence in the U.S. as a loyal ally after the Greenland situation.
Without the monopoly of the petrodollar, the relative value of the fiat currency erodes. And that’s exactly where Bitcoin comes in — not just as another option, but as the real safe haven with genuine scarcity: fixed supply, decentralized, and outside the control of any government.
This doesn’t mean the dollar will disappear overnight, but it is clearly losing ground as the world’s single global currency — slowly at first, but the pace is accelerating.
History has shown us that when confidence in fiat currencies erodes, assets with limited supply and true decentralization like BTC become increasingly attractive. It’s pure systemic necessity.
Hyperinflation imminent? Maybe not tomorrow, but the current direction of policies doesn’t seem like the best way to maintain the dollar’s absolute dominance for much longer.
It looks more like we're facing a dollar with an increasingly dark future and a Bitcoin resurgence that's very likely (if not inevitable) in the medium to long term.
The United States already has the largest debt in its history, surpassing $39 trillion. Much of it is financed simply by issuing more debt. This can hold up in the short term, but the hole keeps getting bigger.
On top of that, with the “America First” policy, several major countries (China, Russia, and others in the BRICS bloc) are accelerating agreements to trade in their own currencies. We're seeing more and more oil and commodity transactions in yuan. Europe, for its part, is also reducing its exposure to U.S. bonds — not just because of tariffs, but especially due to the loss of confidence in the U.S. as a loyal ally after the Greenland situation.
Without the monopoly of the petrodollar, the relative value of the fiat currency erodes. And that’s exactly where Bitcoin comes in — not just as another option, but as the real safe haven with genuine scarcity: fixed supply, decentralized, and outside the control of any government.
This doesn’t mean the dollar will disappear overnight, but it is clearly losing ground as the world’s single global currency — slowly at first, but the pace is accelerating.
History has shown us that when confidence in fiat currencies erodes, assets with limited supply and true decentralization like BTC become increasingly attractive. It’s pure systemic necessity.
Hyperinflation imminent? Maybe not tomorrow, but the current direction of policies doesn’t seem like the best way to maintain the dollar’s absolute dominance for much longer.
The Dark Future of Bitcoin: New Collapse Due to Resurgent Dollar?
Bitcoin, that emotional roller coaster in which we have all invested, seems to be on the brink of a new abyss. With recent reports highlighting the unassailability of the US dollar, the world's most popular cryptocurrency could be about to fall lower than anyone dares to imagine. And, more alarmingly, there are rumors pointing to a tense geopolitical scenario between the US and Iran that could further exacerbate this outcome.
But here is the twist: the dollar, that currency which was thought to be so strong, is on a surprising upward trajectory. Meanwhile, risk assets, including those beloved as Bitcoin, are on the tightrope, waiting for the blow that could come at any moment. Most analysts warn that if the dollar continues its path, the impact on the value of cryptocurrencies could be devastating and swift.
But here is the twist: the dollar, that currency which was thought to be so strong, is on a surprising upward trajectory. Meanwhile, risk assets, including those beloved as Bitcoin, are on the tightrope, waiting for the blow that could come at any moment. Most analysts warn that if the dollar continues its path, the impact on the value of cryptocurrencies could be devastating and swift.
Is risk asset due to "historical parallels"
Ahem… ahem…
Bringing parallels with the Iraq War of 2003 to predict how Bitcoin will behave?
A small uncomfortable detail: in 2003 Satoshi Nakamoto was still doing other things (or who knows what), because Bitcoin did not even exist. The first block was mined in 2009.
In the end, it will turn out that the Battle of Thermopylae (480 BC) was responsible for the first crypto winter, or that the fall of the Roman Empire caused the flash crash of 2010.
This is typical filler analysis: take any geopolitical event, find two charts that look vaguely similar, and title “Risk asset behavior expected!”. Clickbait disguised as depth.
Bitcoin "does" tend to drop in the initial shock of conflicts (as happened in Ukraine 2022: -7-9% quickly), because in moments of pure panic everyone sells liquidity.
But historically it also recovers in weeks/months, often driven by the extra liquidity that governments print to finance wars. It is not a “safe haven” like classic gold, but it is also not just a “risk asset” like a tech stock.
The reality is simpler: in short-term panic → sale. In the medium horizon → Bitcoin benefits from the depreciating fiat money.
Stop forcing parallels with pre-Bitcoin events to generate fear or FOMO. It is sensationalist journalism, not analysis.
Ahem… ahem…
Bringing parallels with the Iraq War of 2003 to predict how Bitcoin will behave?
A small uncomfortable detail: in 2003 Satoshi Nakamoto was still doing other things (or who knows what), because Bitcoin did not even exist. The first block was mined in 2009.
In the end, it will turn out that the Battle of Thermopylae (480 BC) was responsible for the first crypto winter, or that the fall of the Roman Empire caused the flash crash of 2010.
This is typical filler analysis: take any geopolitical event, find two charts that look vaguely similar, and title “Risk asset behavior expected!”. Clickbait disguised as depth.
Bitcoin "does" tend to drop in the initial shock of conflicts (as happened in Ukraine 2022: -7-9% quickly), because in moments of pure panic everyone sells liquidity.
But historically it also recovers in weeks/months, often driven by the extra liquidity that governments print to finance wars. It is not a “safe haven” like classic gold, but it is also not just a “risk asset” like a tech stock.
The reality is simpler: in short-term panic → sale. In the medium horizon → Bitcoin benefits from the depreciating fiat money.
Stop forcing parallels with pre-Bitcoin events to generate fear or FOMO. It is sensationalist journalism, not analysis.
Binance News
·
--
Bitcoin's Potential Reaction to U.S. Entry into Iran: Risk Asset Behavior Expected
Bitcoin is anticipated to behave as a risk asset rather than a safe haven if the United States enters Iran. According to NS3.AI, the downside for Bitcoin would be influenced by higher yields and tighter liquidity. The analysis draws parallels with historical events, such as the 2003 Iraq war and the 2022 Russia-Ukraine invasion, highlighting that Bitcoin experienced a decline of approximately 7% during the initial shock of the Ukraine conflict.
The "Stablecoin Threat" is a Myth
Confusing the growth of stablecoins with a "threat" to Ethereum shows a lack of understanding of how this market actually works.
When the market cap of USDT rises, it’s not because it is "beating" ETH. It’s because capital is seeking safety. Stablecoins are not investments; they are a parking lot.
Nobody joins the crypto space just to hold tokenized dollars. That is simply "fiat" by another name. In an inflationary world, holding fiat—digital or not—guarantees a loss of purchasing power. Is that really the "asset" that is supposed to dethrone Ethereum?
Market Fear vs. Structural Change
What we are seeing is not a shift in leadership; it is market fear. Fear does not build long-term trends; it only pauses them.
When risk appetite returns, that capital will not stay in USDT. It will flow rapidly toward assets with real growth potential.
Calling this a structural threat is, at best, sensationalism. At worst, it’s a forced narrative.
Confusing the growth of stablecoins with a "threat" to Ethereum shows a lack of understanding of how this market actually works.
When the market cap of USDT rises, it’s not because it is "beating" ETH. It’s because capital is seeking safety. Stablecoins are not investments; they are a parking lot.
Nobody joins the crypto space just to hold tokenized dollars. That is simply "fiat" by another name. In an inflationary world, holding fiat—digital or not—guarantees a loss of purchasing power. Is that really the "asset" that is supposed to dethrone Ethereum?
Market Fear vs. Structural Change
What we are seeing is not a shift in leadership; it is market fear. Fear does not build long-term trends; it only pauses them.
When risk appetite returns, that capital will not stay in USDT. It will flow rapidly toward assets with real growth potential.
Calling this a structural threat is, at best, sensationalism. At worst, it’s a forced narrative.
Binance News
·
--
Ethereum's Market Position Threatened by Stablecoin Growth
Ether's (ETH) dominance as the second-largest cryptocurrency is under threat, not due to its proximity to Bitcoin (BTC), but because of the rapid expansion of the stablecoin market. According to Cointelegraph, Ether's position is being challenged as Tether (USDT) and other stablecoins experience significant growth. Over the past five years, Ether has lagged behind top stablecoins like USDT and USD Coin (USDC) in terms of market capitalization growth. While ETH's market cap increased by approximately 11.75% to around $240 billion, USDT saw a staggering 622.50% growth, reaching over $184 billion. This trend has led to speculation about Ethereum's potential loss of its number-two spot by 2026.
On platforms like Polymarket, a significant number of traders are betting on Ethereum being overtaken by 2026, with over 59% of participants predicting this outcome, a notable increase from 17% at the start of the year. The differing growth trajectories of Ethereum and Tether can be attributed to their distinct natures; Ethereum's value is heavily reliant on the price of ETH, which has struggled amid macroeconomic pressures such as U.S. tariffs, geopolitical tensions, and shifting Federal Reserve policies. This has also impacted institutional interest, with U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs experiencing a 65% drop in assets under management, falling to $11.76 billion in March from $31.86 billion in October of the previous year.
In contrast, Tether's growth is fueled by capital inflows into stablecoins, which are seen as safer, more liquid alternatives during volatile market conditions. The total stablecoin market has surged to $310 billion from just $5 billion in 2020, with Tether holding a 58% share. This "dry powder" effect, where capital is parked in dollar-pegged assets, remains strong during risk-off periods. For Ethereum to regain momentum, a stronger risk appetite is necessary to boost ETH's price, whereas Tether benefits from investor caution. This dynamic explains why ETH's market cap growth has lagged behind USDT, despite Ethereum's foundational role in the cryptocurrency ecosystem.
Looking ahead to 2026, Ether faces potential price declines from a technical standpoint. As of Sunday, ETH was trading within a "bear flag" pattern, which suggests a higher likelihood of further downward movement if the price breaks below the pattern's lower trendline. Should this occur, ETH's price could fall towards the pattern's downside target of approximately $1,250 by June, assuming the breakdown continues.
On platforms like Polymarket, a significant number of traders are betting on Ethereum being overtaken by 2026, with over 59% of participants predicting this outcome, a notable increase from 17% at the start of the year. The differing growth trajectories of Ethereum and Tether can be attributed to their distinct natures; Ethereum's value is heavily reliant on the price of ETH, which has struggled amid macroeconomic pressures such as U.S. tariffs, geopolitical tensions, and shifting Federal Reserve policies. This has also impacted institutional interest, with U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs experiencing a 65% drop in assets under management, falling to $11.76 billion in March from $31.86 billion in October of the previous year.
In contrast, Tether's growth is fueled by capital inflows into stablecoins, which are seen as safer, more liquid alternatives during volatile market conditions. The total stablecoin market has surged to $310 billion from just $5 billion in 2020, with Tether holding a 58% share. This "dry powder" effect, where capital is parked in dollar-pegged assets, remains strong during risk-off periods. For Ethereum to regain momentum, a stronger risk appetite is necessary to boost ETH's price, whereas Tether benefits from investor caution. This dynamic explains why ETH's market cap growth has lagged behind USDT, despite Ethereum's foundational role in the cryptocurrency ecosystem.
Looking ahead to 2026, Ether faces potential price declines from a technical standpoint. As of Sunday, ETH was trading within a "bear flag" pattern, which suggests a higher likelihood of further downward movement if the price breaks below the pattern's lower trendline. Should this occur, ETH's price could fall towards the pattern's downside target of approximately $1,250 by June, assuming the breakdown continues.
😓 we cannot find a pattern in just 12 years, such a short time is irrelevant. In 2008 BTC did not exist, it is really impossible to know how BTC will act in the impending crisis
Bitcoin has closed in red for 5 consecutive months.
October. November. December. January. February.
March closes on Tuesday.
At this moment, BTC is at $66k, down for the month.
Six consecutive red monthly closes would match the longest streak in Bitcoin's history.
The record was set between August 2018 and January 2019.
The only other time this happened, BTC was at $3,400 and then rose by 300% in five months.
#Marialecripto operate here👇👉 $BTC
{future}(BTCUSDT)
October. November. December. January. February.
March closes on Tuesday.
At this moment, BTC is at $66k, down for the month.
Six consecutive red monthly closes would match the longest streak in Bitcoin's history.
The record was set between August 2018 and January 2019.
The only other time this happened, BTC was at $3,400 and then rose by 300% in five months.
#Marialecripto operate here👇👉 $BTC
{future}(BTCUSDT)
Well, wars will no longer be like before,
they are on their way to being almost like I dreamed when I was a child, in a utopian way I dreamed that our leaders would duel in a Gladiator style in the arena and the winner who wins the war, without the death of civilians or soldiers sent to the slaughterhouse by the leader's thirst for glory. And it's no longer like that, let's look at Maduro and Khamenei for example. For now, the USA has the advantage in technology but that won't last long with AI. WHEN THEY ALL START TO FEAR ONLY FOR THEIR OWN LIVES EVERYTHING WILL CHANGE. It will be amusing to see how our leaders start to become milder, because they are the only ones or the ones who risk the most, and so it should be, since they are the only ones responsible. There will be no Coliseum but neither a bunker to hide.
they are on their way to being almost like I dreamed when I was a child, in a utopian way I dreamed that our leaders would duel in a Gladiator style in the arena and the winner who wins the war, without the death of civilians or soldiers sent to the slaughterhouse by the leader's thirst for glory. And it's no longer like that, let's look at Maduro and Khamenei for example. For now, the USA has the advantage in technology but that won't last long with AI. WHEN THEY ALL START TO FEAR ONLY FOR THEIR OWN LIVES EVERYTHING WILL CHANGE. It will be amusing to see how our leaders start to become milder, because they are the only ones or the ones who risk the most, and so it should be, since they are the only ones responsible. There will be no Coliseum but neither a bunker to hide.
"Oh, keep printing those USD as if they were nightclub flyers!
In Europe, we already know what to do with them:
we stick them to the ceiling of the bar like trophies of a plummeting economy, watching our beers while the dollar dissolves faster than ice in August.
And at this rate, even PEPE, which is worth less than a bad joke– will reach a quote of 1 $
Because nothing screams 'financial stability' like decorating pubs with banknotes that will tomorrow be used to wrap fish and chips. Cheers to the monetary circus! 🍺💸🐸"
THE IMAGES ARE REAL, not AI
( if you don't believe me, use Google lens)
In Europe, we already know what to do with them:
we stick them to the ceiling of the bar like trophies of a plummeting economy, watching our beers while the dollar dissolves faster than ice in August.
And at this rate, even PEPE, which is worth less than a bad joke– will reach a quote of 1 $
Because nothing screams 'financial stability' like decorating pubs with banknotes that will tomorrow be used to wrap fish and chips. Cheers to the monetary circus! 🍺💸🐸"
THE IMAGES ARE REAL, not AI
( if you don't believe me, use Google lens)
WE ALREADY HAVE A COUPLE MORE INDICATORS TO COMPLETE THE EQUATION :
1) STATE BONDS (all states) rising and 2) NEW ENERGY CRISIS (Iran war)
1) STATE BONDS (all states) rising and 2) NEW ENERGY CRISIS (Iran war)
ARE WE IN THE MIDDLE OF A BEAR MARKET? WHERE ARE WE GOING?
You can't be sure, we just have to compare with previous cycles:
The historic drops of Bitcoin (BTC) of ~84% in 2018 and ~77.6% in 2022 cannot be attributed to a single cause; they are a combination of the market cycle structure (halving and buyer exhaustion) and macroeconomic or systemic events that acted as catalysts.
What was the context behind those corrections?:
1. The 2018 Cycle: From the euphoria of ICOs to regulatory pressure
After reaching $20,000 in December 2017, BTC fell by 84%.
The historic drops of Bitcoin (BTC) of ~84% in 2018 and ~77.6% in 2022 cannot be attributed to a single cause; they are a combination of the market cycle structure (halving and buyer exhaustion) and macroeconomic or systemic events that acted as catalysts.
What was the context behind those corrections?:
1. The 2018 Cycle: From the euphoria of ICOs to regulatory pressure
After reaching $20,000 in December 2017, BTC fell by 84%.
Short in BTC today???
I have a question:
those of you who opened a Short position after the employment data, those who opened the position with BTC above 70000- 70200. $BTC
if you still haven't closed TP...
Do you have the stop loss above 71500- 72000?
I would really like to know your opinion and are we risky or reckless.
I have a question:
those of you who opened a Short position after the employment data, those who opened the position with BTC above 70000- 70200. $BTC
if you still haven't closed TP...
Do you have the stop loss above 71500- 72000?
I would really like to know your opinion and are we risky or reckless.
😳?????
the contracting party of the first part...
the contracting party of the first part...
Binance News
·
--
AI, Not Humans, Are the True Users of Crypto, Says Dragonfly Capital Partner
Dragonfly Capital's managing partner, Haseeb Qureshi, has expressed that artificial intelligence, rather than humans, are the real users of cryptocurrency systems. According to Bitalk News, Qureshi highlighted that the crypto ecosystem contains pitfalls absent in traditional financial systems. He argued that if users were blamed for lacking security awareness a decade ago and continue to be blamed today, the issue might not lie with the users but with the choice of users. These systems, he noted, are not designed for humans but are well-suited for non-human participants.
The concept of smart contracts was initially introduced by Ethereum's early builders, who were highly technical software engineers. However, most users do not belong to this category. Qureshi pointed out that AI agents think in a manner more aligned with these engineers, suggesting a closer fit between AI and the crypto systems.
The concept of smart contracts was initially introduced by Ethereum's early builders, who were highly technical software engineers. However, most users do not belong to this category. Qureshi pointed out that AI agents think in a manner more aligned with these engineers, suggesting a closer fit between AI and the crypto systems.
😳????
Binance News
·
--
AI, Not Humans, Are the True Users of Crypto, Says Dragonfly Capital Partner
Dragonfly Capital's managing partner, Haseeb Qureshi, has expressed that artificial intelligence, rather than humans, are the real users of cryptocurrency systems. According to Bitalk News, Qureshi highlighted that the crypto ecosystem contains pitfalls absent in traditional financial systems. He argued that if users were blamed for lacking security awareness a decade ago and continue to be blamed today, the issue might not lie with the users but with the choice of users. These systems, he noted, are not designed for humans but are well-suited for non-human participants.
The concept of smart contracts was initially introduced by Ethereum's early builders, who were highly technical software engineers. However, most users do not belong to this category. Qureshi pointed out that AI agents think in a manner more aligned with these engineers, suggesting a closer fit between AI and the crypto systems.
The concept of smart contracts was initially introduced by Ethereum's early builders, who were highly technical software engineers. However, most users do not belong to this category. Qureshi pointed out that AI agents think in a manner more aligned with these engineers, suggesting a closer fit between AI and the crypto systems.
What a great time to make unlocks, isn't it? War + rates + tariffs + unlock... just waiting for Powell to say he's going to raise rates as a farewell. This is the 🎉 of the short
Binance News
·
--
Upcoming Token Unlocks May Affect Cryptocurrency Market Dynamics
Over the next week, several cryptocurrencies are set to undergo significant token unlock events, according to NS3.AI. These events will involve one-time releases exceeding $5 million, alongside a series of linear daily unlocks surpassing $1 million for prominent tokens like SOL and DOGE. The increase in circulating supply from these unlocks could potentially influence the market dynamics of the affected cryptocurrencies.
very good post, but the example of the taco and the pizza, which cause obesity and diabetes, I would change it to salad or vegetable grill 😅
🚨 BREAKING (and kinda funny): Peter Schiff says… sell Bitcoin before the next crash and buy gold or silver! 😅
Yes, the famous gold bull himself just gave the classic “Bitcoin is risky” shot — and told people to stack gold and silver instead.
But let’s unpack this with a smile and a portfolio balance mindset:
⸻
🧠 What Peter Schiff actually means
Peter has always loved gold and silver more than Bitcoin.
So when he says “sell BTC for gold/silver,” it’s mostly:
🟡 A classic Schiff-style take
🪙 A reminder that precious metals are still around
⚖️ A nudge toward portfolio diversification
He’s not wrong about having safe havens — just maybe dramatic about Bitcoin. 😄
⸻
📊 The Balanced Take
Here’s a meme-proof way to think about it:
📍 Bitcoin → Growth/innovation risk asset
📍 Gold & Silver → Traditional safe havens
📍 Bitcoin + Gold + Silver → Balanced wealth approach
Why choose just one? You can manage exposure across all three depending on risk tolerance and time horizon.
⸻
😂 If Bitcoin had feelings:
🐂 BTC: “I’m close to the bottom!”
🏆 Schiff: “Sell! Buy gold!”
🤝 You: “Hold BTC, stack gold, and tuck some silver away too!”
It’s like arguing whether tacos are better than pizza — sometimes the answer is why not both? 🌮🍕
⸻
📌 Smart Money Mindset (Not Hype)
Instead of extreme “all in” narratives from either side:
✔ Scale some Bitcoin if your thesis weakens
✔ Stack some gold/silver as a hedge
✔ Keep a portion in cash or other assets
✔ Let markets tell you when to rotate
Risk management > tribal shouting.
#Bitcoin #Gold #Silver #Crypto #Diversify
HODL HERE $XAU $XAG $BTC 👇
{future}(BTCUSDT)
{future}(XAGUSDT)
{future}(XAUUSDT)
Yes, the famous gold bull himself just gave the classic “Bitcoin is risky” shot — and told people to stack gold and silver instead.
But let’s unpack this with a smile and a portfolio balance mindset:
⸻
🧠 What Peter Schiff actually means
Peter has always loved gold and silver more than Bitcoin.
So when he says “sell BTC for gold/silver,” it’s mostly:
🟡 A classic Schiff-style take
🪙 A reminder that precious metals are still around
⚖️ A nudge toward portfolio diversification
He’s not wrong about having safe havens — just maybe dramatic about Bitcoin. 😄
⸻
📊 The Balanced Take
Here’s a meme-proof way to think about it:
📍 Bitcoin → Growth/innovation risk asset
📍 Gold & Silver → Traditional safe havens
📍 Bitcoin + Gold + Silver → Balanced wealth approach
Why choose just one? You can manage exposure across all three depending on risk tolerance and time horizon.
⸻
😂 If Bitcoin had feelings:
🐂 BTC: “I’m close to the bottom!”
🏆 Schiff: “Sell! Buy gold!”
🤝 You: “Hold BTC, stack gold, and tuck some silver away too!”
It’s like arguing whether tacos are better than pizza — sometimes the answer is why not both? 🌮🍕
⸻
📌 Smart Money Mindset (Not Hype)
Instead of extreme “all in” narratives from either side:
✔ Scale some Bitcoin if your thesis weakens
✔ Stack some gold/silver as a hedge
✔ Keep a portion in cash or other assets
✔ Let markets tell you when to rotate
Risk management > tribal shouting.
#Bitcoin #Gold #Silver #Crypto #Diversify
HODL HERE $XAU $XAG $BTC 👇
{future}(BTCUSDT)
{future}(XAGUSDT)
{future}(XAUUSDT)
😊👍
hay dear i followed you plz follow me back
that no, that no, there is no inflation, nor deflation, nor stagflation, nor reflation. what exists right now is described with a new term: TRUMPFLATION Do you know what it means?
Crypto Eagles
·
--
🚨 BIG WARNING: US ECONOMY IS HEADING TOWARDS STAGFLATION
Just now, US PPI and Core PPI data was released.
US PPI came in at 2.9% vs. 2.6% expected.
US Core PPI came in at 3.6%, its highest level in 11 months.
This is a clear sign that US inflation is heating up again.
But what about GDP?
Well, US Q4 GDP came in at 1.4%, its worst print in 3 quarters.
This means the economy is shrinking while inflation is heating up.
That's what stagflation is, and it's the worst possible thing for an economy.
During such periods, easing monetary policy boosts GDP but makes the inflation situation worse.
The tightening policy brings inflation lower, but GDP gets even worse.
This means the Fed is completely trapped now, and nothing good will happen without breaking the economy first.
Just now, US PPI and Core PPI data was released.
US PPI came in at 2.9% vs. 2.6% expected.
US Core PPI came in at 3.6%, its highest level in 11 months.
This is a clear sign that US inflation is heating up again.
But what about GDP?
Well, US Q4 GDP came in at 1.4%, its worst print in 3 quarters.
This means the economy is shrinking while inflation is heating up.
That's what stagflation is, and it's the worst possible thing for an economy.
During such periods, easing monetary policy boosts GDP but makes the inflation situation worse.
The tightening policy brings inflation lower, but GDP gets even worse.
This means the Fed is completely trapped now, and nothing good will happen without breaking the economy first.
Good thing you are dedicated to trading, because if you were dedicated to predicting the weather, in Seville during Holy Week they would tie you to the Giralda
I guarantee it 100% 🎯
$SOL will reach $100 in 12 hours 🚀
Keep your Long position in $SOL.
{future}(SOLUSDT)
$SOL will reach $100 in 12 hours 🚀
Keep your Long position in $SOL.
{future}(SOLUSDT)
😂 the Wikipedia? 2050? predicts? and what does it predict about Wikipedia?
Binance News
·
--
Wikipedia Co-Founder Predicts Bitcoin's Future Challenges
Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales has expressed skepticism about Bitcoin's future as a currency or store of value. According to NS3.AI, Wales predicts that while Bitcoin may continue to exist as a network, its price could fall below $10,000 by 2050. He cites Bitcoin's limited adoption and volatility as reasons for its unlikely success as a dominant form of money or a safe haven asset. While some analysts share this bearish outlook, others caution against overreacting to price fluctuations, leaving Bitcoin's long-term role in the financial landscape uncertain.
Login to explore more contents