puppies_飞

#美联储利率决议 下周金融圈要炸！美联储+Do Kwon双炸弹，谁先把市场干懵？

下周的金融&币圈，直接把“刺激”焊死在日程上——美联储利率决议+Do Kwon量刑，俩重磅炸弹凑一块儿，谁看了不捏把汗？

先聊美联储：这几年它家利率一动，美股、比特币就得抖三抖。现在全市场都在赌“降不降”——要是放宽松话，币圈能直接蹦上天；要是还端着鹰派架子，估计又是集体跳水局。毕竟不管传统资本还是币圈玩家，早把美联储的话当“涨跌圣旨”了。

再看Do Kwon这出大戏更狠：当初LUNA崩盘把无数人钱包炸穿，现在这“始作俑者”终于要判了。这量刑可不是他一个人的事儿——判重了，等于给币圈违规者敲死“死刑警告”；判轻了，指不定又有人敢出来搞事。

俩炸弹撞一周，要么双喜临门，要么双重暴击。

你赌下周是“币圈美股一起飞”还是“集体蹲墙角吃面”？评论区留预测，准了我喊你爹！

#贝莱德谜之操作 BlackRock 2026 Report: Is AI the "Money-Generating Engine" and Will Stablecoins Take Bank Jobs?

The global asset management giant BlackRock has just released its 2026 investment report, which directly lays bare the market's vulnerabilities—today's world is being reshaped by "super forces" like AI, geopolitics, and stablecoins, especially AI, which is no longer just a "pie-in-the-sky concept" but is the true driving engine behind the surge in U.S. stocks.

What’s most ruthless is AI's "burning cash logic": right now, investing in computing power and building data centers is all about "paying first and eating later," but it may take years to see returns. This has turned the market into a "tech stock solo dance," but BlackRock says not to worry—once AI profits fill the pockets of the entire industry, the opportunities for active stock selection could explode. Even more outrageous is their prediction: by 2026, AI investments could boost U.S. economic growth to three times the historical average, and even if the labor market cools down, the economy could keep bouncing.

Even more fantastical is the stablecoin situation: BlackRock claims that this thing is already competing for bank deposits, and if regulations loosen a bit, it could even take over the lending role of banks. In emerging markets, stablecoins are directly replacing local currencies, helping the dollar "expand its territory" while poking the local central banks in the ribs—these aren't just coins, they're the "catfish stealing food" in the financial circle.

Finally, BlackRock's approach is quite straightforward: strategically focusing on AI and infrastructure, tactically buying U.S. tech stocks and emerging market debt, while even gold is relegated to being just a "short-term tool."

Is this wave of AI cash burning a "wealth creation machine" or a "bubble bomb"? Can stablecoins really corner banks? Place your bets in the comments, and if you lose, please treat us to milk tea!

#美SEC推动加密创新监管 exploded! The chairman of the US SEC shouted, 'The future of finance is cryptocurrency.' Is the crypto world going crazy?

Today, the crypto world directly erupted— the head of the US SEC made a statement: 'In a few years, the entire financial system will have to shift to Bitcoin and cryptocurrency; this is the future of the world!'

It's important to note that the SEC is the 'decision-maker' in US financial regulation. Previously, cryptocurrencies were always scrutinized, but now the head is directly endorsing it as 'the future'? This move is equivalent to issuing an 'official pass' to the crypto world.

Now, this is great; crypto players are excited: Bitcoin prices are likely to soar, traditional financial institutions might hold emergency meetings overnight— they used to avoid cryptocurrencies, but now they have to rush to create products and set up platforms. However, we also need to pour some cold water on this: this thing skyrockets wildly and crashes even harder, and the regulatory details are still unclear, so don’t rush in just because of excitement. $BTC

But speaking of which, from 'wild asset' to the regulatory head shouting 'the future,' is cryptocurrency really set to enter the mainstream? $ETH

Do you think this wave is a 'signal to get on board' or a 'pie-in-the-sky scheme'? Bet a dollar in the comments! $BNB

#数字人民币 Why did China directly stop stablecoins? This move is very insightful.

Recently, US dollar stablecoins have surged globally, and the US has just legislated to turn them into a "digital dollar avatar". Many countries are following suit, but China has called a halt—no more yuan stablecoins, and instead, they are vigorously promoting the digital yuan. This action seems counterintuitive, but it actually has its reasons.

Do you think stablecoins are "stable money in the crypto circle"? Wrong, USDT accounts for 99% of the global stablecoin market, essentially acting as "the US dollar in digital clothing". The US legislating to promote it is not about regulating the market; it's about getting more countries to use "digital dollars" and solidifying US dollar hegemony in the crypto world. Other countries trying to create non-dollar stablecoins? Useless; the global liquidity of the dollar is there, and whatever you create will just serve as a backdrop for USDT.

More critically, this thing is a "financial bomb": without global regulation overseeing it, it could turn into a channel for money laundering and tax evasion at any moment; if the yuan also had a stablecoin, it would mean leaving a crack in monetary sovereignty for the dollar—if the US can control USDT, it can indirectly influence your wallet. Who can bear that risk?

China is not foolish; our digital yuan is originally the ceiling for global mobile payments. Shanghai has even set up an international operation center, directly using it to "openly expand abroad". Isn't that more reliable than following stablecoins for popularity? Now, 15 departments are jointly cracking down on virtual currencies, explicitly stating that "stablecoins are virtual currencies and are all illegal", effectively blocking the dollar's "digital tentacles" at the door.

This is not just following the trend? It’s about taking the initiative into our own hands—while you play your dollar stablecoin “hegemony game”, I’m developing my digital yuan “safe track”.

By the way, do you think this move is conservative or clever? Let’s discuss in the comments! $USDT $USDC

#币安也有身份证 My ID card is an active newcomer 😄

$PEPE Little Green Baby seems to have an article to work on...

$DOGE DOGE ETF cools down completely: Institutions don't even take a glance, and retail investors can't be bothered

The DOGE ETF has basically stalled——Grayscale's GDOG has only accumulated $2.68 million in half a month since its listing, managing less than $7 million, which doesn't even account for 0.03% of DOGE's total market value; Bitwise is even worse, with zero inflow, and a daily trading volume of only $1.09 million, like a joke.

Previously, there was talk of "Meme coins stepping into the big leagues of institutions," but reality slapped back: Traditional institutions simply don’t recognize this stuff. Just look at Solana and XRP's ETFs; they casually attracted hundreds of millions in their first week, with real staking yields and genuine use cases for cross-border payments; and DOGE? Besides the community shouting 'Doge to the moon', there isn't even a legitimate application scenario, so it's no surprise institutions don't care.

What’s even more disheartening is that retail investors aren't buying it either—why buy coins directly on exchanges when it's so nice? Why pay management fees to go through the ETF route? Even Grayscale has waived the fees to 0, yet no one cares, since DOGE players are used to the "direct trading" approach; who would want to play within the confines of traditional finance?

Now the situation is clear: There’s an insurmountable gap between Meme coins and institutional funds. A coin that relies on emotions to rise is viewed by institutions as "lacking fundamentals, highly volatile, and ready to crash at any moment"—the data for GDOG, put simply, is just “institutions look down on it, and retail investors can't be bothered to buy,” purely a lose-lose situation.

By the way, has this DOGE ETF already become a "zombie product"? Betting fifty cents in the comments, do you think this thing can survive through this year? #美联储降息 #加密市场观察

#CZ与一姐 CZ just finished talking: My tweets are just casual chat, don't use my words to issue Meme coins to cut leeks!

Binance boss CZ is once again eager to clarify the boundaries - on December 7, he retweeted He Yi's statement that 'issuing coins based on angles found in tweets is a community action,' directly rebutting: 'DOYR=DO YouR Meme? Even if someone turns my commonly used phrases into Memes, I will still tweet, but the words in the tweet have nothing to do with whether I recognize Meme coins or not.'

What this means is: don't just take my words and issue coins to cut retail investors; I haven't endorsed any Meme!

Old crypto folks understand, CZ is scared of being 'tweeted at' for this. Previously, he showcased his dog 'Broccoli,' and the community immediately created hundreds of 'Broccoli coins,' causing the BNB chain to become paralyzed, and retail investors lost money and cried out for help; later, when he mentioned a charity project 'Giggle Academy,' someone quickly issued the $GIGGLE coin, which skyrocketed and then crashed, and he rushed out to say 'I didn't do it.'

This time it's even more extreme: even if I casually say 'DOYR,' you issuing coins is your business; my mouth may slip, but if you lose money, don't blame me. After all, there were retail investors who chased his tweets to buy coins and lost money, then turned around and scolded him for 'leading the way to cut leeks' - CZ has effectively welded the 'disclaimer' into the tweet.

Netizens found it amusing:
'So you tweet to gain traffic, and we take the fall as leeks?'
'Next time CZ says ‘drink water,’ should we be careful that someone issues the $HESHUI coin?'

Interestingly, the more CZ clarifies, the more excited the community becomes - 'CZ-style phrases' have long become the traffic password for Meme coins. What do you think, will someone really create a $DOYR coin this time to cut a wave? Bet a piece of candy in the comments!

#风险与回报 Binance trader who made 45 million got wrecked: retail investors, stop day trading, this is just a scam to take your money!\n \nThe top trader on Binance who made 45 million dollars came out today to wake up retail investors: "Want to avoid losses? First, stop day trading—this thing is just a direct scam for retail!"\n \nThis trader is called Pickle Cat. He started trading in his teens, was obsessed with high-frequency day trading, and thought he was the 'trading Batman,' but ended up losing so much that his grandma's automatic BTC investment earned more than he did. Later, he switched to low-frequency swing trading, stopped randomly adjusting positions, took profits when he could, and ended up making a lot of money. Now he is the top trader on Binance.\n \nHe said that retail traders doing day trading are just giving away money: institutions have order flow and liquidity data, while you only have candlestick charts and TradingView; trading more than 10 times a week, the mathematical probabilities will just crush you down. What's worse is that kids as young as 14 dare to call themselves 'day traders'; they buy a course, join a group, and think they have a 'trading system'—this is not learning a skill! This is disguising a casino as a coffee shop; you are sitting at a gambling table, thinking you're enjoying a latte.\n \nThis trader revealed a heartbreaking truth: those retail traders who seem to be making money, 99% of them just got lucky and caught a big trend and happened to learn to take profits. "Making money isn’t hard; keeping the money is the real hell—don’t gamble again just because you made a little. Every time I lost big was because I did that."\n \nIn the end, he said: "If you know you're gambling, at least you'll run; but if you think this is a 'technical skill,' then just wait to be drained dry."\n \n—Do you know anyone around you who lost badly in day trading? Comment below whether this thing is really a trap! $BTC $ETH $BNB

#中国🇨🇳政府监管 just exploded! Seven associations are confronting the cryptocurrency world, but the United States is betting on the future of blockchain? This contrast is too exciting

The news that my family just brushed past left me stunned——

The seven major financial associations in China (including internet finance, banks, and other top players) have just joined forces to make a strong statement: virtual currencies and RWA tokens are nothing but a “pretext” for illegal fundraising! Coins like π and stablecoins are all traps, clearly stating “this stuff is not legal tender, it cannot be used domestically,” and they have ordered financial institutions to refrain from involvement, urging ordinary people to keep their distance.

On this side, the regulatory iron fist has just come down, while on the other side, the United States is directly “turning the tables”: the SEC chairman has declared “in the next 2 years, all markets in the U.S. must move to the blockchain,” saying that tokenization can clarify asset ownership; Vitalik Buterin is even more direct, complaining that there is currently a lack of an on-chain gas futures market, otherwise who knows if transaction fees will skyrocket in two years.

Additionally, Saylor, who holds a massive amount of Bitcoin, directly threw the “selling coins calculation” in their face: if equity is valuable, sell equity; if Bitcoin is valuable, sell coin derivatives, emphasizing “whichever side makes a profit, hold onto that side.”

So, I ask, is this contrast stimulating enough? On one side, China is shutting down virtual currency risks, while on the other side, the United States is betting on the future of blockchain, and even the big shots are openly “calculating accounts.”

What do you think, is this round more stable and precise in China, or is America betting on the future? Share in the comments your most anxious experiences in the cryptocurrency trap! $USDT

#一姐meme文化 Binance's He Yi just said: You guys are taking words from the official Twitter to issue coins, it has nothing to do with me!

I just saw the latest remarks from Binance Co-CEO He Yi, directly pointing out the issue of "the community taking words from the official Twitter to issue coins"—

"Our official Twitter can be called whatever name and post whatever style, that's the freedom of operation, but if you take a couple of words from my speech or the official Twitter posts to issue new coins, that's purely the community messing around, it has nothing to do with Binance whatsoever!"

Her words are quite straightforward: on one hand, she says, "We can't stop tweeting just because some people love to 'find angles'," while on the other, she draws a clear line—are Binance employees allowed to touch any token issuance or promotion work? Not a chance. Even the phrase "encouraging employees to innovate" was specifically supplemented with, "limited to daily work, completely unrelated to issuing coins."

In the end, she threw in the line, "The fate of expression is to be misunderstood," and added, "Investment risks are to be borne by yourself (DOYR)."

Honestly, this situation is too common in the crypto circle—when top platforms or influencers casually say something, immediately someone digs out words, rides the hype to issue new coins, and while they are "taking" traffic, they might just run away with the money. This time, He Yi directly broke the window paper, which essentially serves as a reminder: don't rush just because you see 'related to Binance', we won't take the blame.

What do you think, is this He Yi avoiding a pitfall in advance, or is the community's hype operation too outrageous? Let's discuss in the comments the most outrageous "taking words to issue coins" operations you've seen! $币安人生 $客服小何

#美国政府 The US economy is facing a crisis, is the cryptocurrency market about to go on a roller coaster ride?

Folks! The 'recession alarm' for the US economy is ringing loudly, and the cryptocurrency market is likely to feel the tremors!

The newly released data is shocking: the ratio of US leading economic indicators to coincident indicators has dropped to 0.85, the lowest since the 2008 financial crisis, and it has been declining for four consecutive years! Those in the know understand that one of these indicators looks at 'future economy' (consumer confidence, factory orders, etc.), while the other looks at 'current economy' (real-time data like non-farm employment). Historically, when this ratio collapses, the US economy is surely in recession.

This issue hitting the cryptocurrency market translates to a rhythm of 'panic followed by gambling': in the short term, once the recession appears, risk assets like US stocks and cryptocurrencies will definitely be sold off for safety—Bitcoin and Ethereum will likely take a hit first; but if the Federal Reserve can't hold back and shifts from raising interest rates to cutting them and injecting money, then the loose funds may flow back into the cryptocurrency market, and in the long run, prices might rebound.

What's most exciting is the current 'middle state': the economy has already faced a crisis, the Federal Reserve hasn't loosened up yet, and the cryptocurrency market will likely experience 'sharp declines + sharp rises' in rapid succession, with volatility reaching its peak.

What do you all think about this wave—is it better to wait for a big drop or to directly buy the dip and bet on a rebound? Guess the wave trend in the comments! $BTC $ETH $BNB

#西联汇款 Western Union is making a big move: issuing a stablecoin card to 'save' the wallets of countries with high inflation

Folks, international remittance giant Western Union has recently pulled off a bold move—issuing a payment card that can be topped up with stablecoins, targeting countries with skyrocketing inflation!

Take Argentina, for example; last year inflation soared above 200%, and the local currency depreciated rapidly, causing people's money to lose value in the blink of an eye. This card from Western Union perfectly addresses this pain point: using a dollar stablecoin as a 'wallet,' no matter how much the local currency devalues, the assets in the card are anchored to the dollar, and when receiving remittances, the money is directly locked in stablecoins, effectively providing a 'devaluation buffer' for purchasing power. Western Union's CFO has stated clearly: this card is designed to help people in high-inflation areas protect their money.

But that's not all; Western Union is also working on its own stablecoin—called USDPT, which is issued in collaboration with Anchorage Digital on the Solana blockchain, with plans to launch in 2026. Essentially, they are first testing the waters with the payment card, and later will issue their own coin, tying traditional remittances and crypto assets together, aiming to build a new bridge in the scenarios of cross-border transfers and local spending.

However, this isn't without its challenges: Is the stablecoin reliable? Are local regulations allowing this? These are all unknowns. But to put it another way, for countries where money becomes less valuable over time, can this card be considered a 'lifeline'? Can the combination of traditional finance and crypto assets become a new option for emerging markets?
(Not suitable for China users)
Do you think this card can become popular? Let’s chat in the comments! $ASTER $ZEC

#加密货币 Is cryptocurrency about to "change"? This time the approach is completely different from what you think.

Did you think the mainstreaming of cryptocurrency meant a surge in Bitcoin or the hype of NFTs? Wrong—it's quietly changing its appearance: it's neither dominated by Bitcoin and Ethereum nor the excitement created by NFTs and meme coins, even technical terms like EVM and SVM are taking a back seat.

Today's blockchain is no longer focused on the "chain"; it has become a "block database"—like setting up a "shared trusted hard drive" for millions of apps, where any application can directly pull data from it, ensuring security and reliability.

This transformation has three "counterintuitive" aspects:

- Previously, each chain was like an island; now, "interoperability" is the key—without data connectivity, even the most apps are just playing in their own sandboxes;
- When AI and blockchain team up, business models change directly: the chain manages the authenticity of data, while AI manages how to use the data, enabling finance to automatically match suitable loans and supply chains to predict inventory based on data. The processes that used to take a lot of time can now be done with just a click;
- The future of frictionless finance does not necessarily require a "super giant chain"; what is needed is a "universal foundation" similar to internet protocols— it may not grab the spotlight, but all services can run smoothly on it.

In short, cryptocurrency isn't about becoming a "celebrity coin"; it's about being the "invisible infrastructure" behind the apps on your phone and your daily spending.

Do you think this "quiet change" is truly reliable or just another empty promise? Come to the comments section and discuss! $BTC $ETH

$USDT $ASTER Cryptocurrency market explosion! Hong Kong shelves USDT, mainland fully bans it, regulatory combination punches strike at stablecoins

Family, who understands this! The cryptocurrency market has just welcomed a wave of "double blows," with Hong Kong and the mainland synchronously taking action against stablecoins, this regulatory storm has turned the entire industry upside down!

First, let's look at the mainland side, this time they have really taken hard measures! The authorities have clearly defined stablecoins as belonging to illegal financial activities, and it’s not just as simple as banning trading; criminal responsibility will also be pursued. According to statistics, this year alone, over 300 related cases have been investigated, with the amount of involved funds successfully intercepted reaching as high as 4.6 billion! Anyone with clear eyes can see that this operation is clearing obstacles for the comprehensive promotion of the digital RMB, and nobody should think they can exploit loopholes anymore.

Now turning our attention to Hong Kong, after the new regulations were implemented, the situation has drastically changed! Because the issuer Tether did not obtain a compliant license, ordinary retail investors are completely banned from trading USDT, only professional investors can participate. It is evident that Hong Kong's operation aims to use high thresholds to filter compliant institutions, firmly locking the application scenarios of stablecoins in sectors such as cross-border trade and tourism consumption, rather than allowing them to grow wildly in the speculative market.

With this regulatory combination punch, the signal for industry reshuffling has been fully activated: the trading of USDT in the mainland will inevitably shrink rapidly, with funds either flowing to digital RMB or finding new compliant channels; more transparent compliant stablecoins like USDC might seize the opportunity to capture market share; Hong Kong aims to attract large institutions through strict regulation, creating a high-end compliant financial experimental area.

On one side is the complete ban from the mainland, and on the other is Hong Kong's retail investor ban, with USDT, the largest stablecoin in the cryptocurrency market, facing continuous restrictions in core markets. Could this be the starting point of a new round of industry reshuffling? Can Hong Kong's "sandbox experiment" become a new entry point for mainstream funds in the future? Come and share your thoughts in the comments! 👇#香港监管收紧

$DOGE Dogecoin New Year aims for $2? Overseas community has collectively FOMO'd, can Musk take it to the moon again?

Family, who understands? Recently, the overseas circle of Dogecoin has completely exploded, and the target of $2 for the New Year has become a consensus. Many foreigners are even shouting out mid-term goals of $2.36 and a long-term target of $7.2, creating an unstoppable wave of fervent FOMO in the entire English community.

"To play Dogecoin, you have to follow the foreigners!" This phrase has been flying around the overseas crypto space lately. It's important to know that the current popularity of Dogecoin owes much to Musk's 'little puppy' meme; a single joke from him once sent Dogecoin's market value on a roller coaster. Now, the overseas community is collectively bullish, with many betting that Musk can pull off another miracle and lead this 'little puppy' to a new round of sprint.

Some have reported that discussions about Dogecoin on recent overseas social platforms have surged threefold, with many retail investors sharing their holdings screenshots, shouting to 'follow the big team and get the soup.' There are also technical analysts stating that Dogecoin's trend has shown key breakthrough signals, and the $2 target is not baseless, with the $2.36 mid-term level being marked by many analysts as a 'reasonable expectation.'

However, the atmosphere in the domestic circle is completely different, with more cautious voices prevailing. Many veteran players are reminding that cryptocurrency is highly volatile, and the overseas enthusiasm may likely be short-term speculation. Blindly following trends can easily lead to being 'cut like chives'; it's better to lay out a steadier plan.

On one side is the overseas community's collective bullish expectations, and on the other side is the rational conservatism of the domestic circle. Now, Dogecoin stands at the crossroads of the wind. Finally, I want to ask everyone: which side are you on? Will you ride the wave of overseas enthusiasm, or will you hold on to the steady pace of the domestic market and observe until the end? Let's discuss your choice in the comments!#马斯克概念

#币安CEO He Yi Takes Charge of Binance: From "Chief Customer Service" to CEO, a Female Executive's "Down-to-Earth" Work Philosophy

The crypto community has been talking about who these days? He Yi! Yes, she is the woman who just took the position of Binance CEO, but still refers to herself as "Customer Service Xiao He" on Twitter.

To be honest, everyone knows CZ at Binance, but He Yi is the soul of the company that makes you feel, "This company really has warmth." From Chief Customer Service Officer to CEO, from her "official title" to being known as customer service in the community, her story is almost another side of Binance—no lofty elite feeling, just sincerity of "I'm here to solve problems."

Recently, she mentioned two particularly interesting things in an interview. First, the entrepreneur she admires the most is Duan Yongping. Yes, the Duan Yongping who believes in "doing things properly and being a proper person." In a crypto world where everyone wants to "make it big," this return to essential values reveals a rare clarity. Second, when she talked about women's choices in the workplace, she didn’t offer grand theories, just one sentence: find what you truly want to invest in, and then go all out. No gender opposition, no selling anxiety, which makes people willing to listen.

After CZ expanded the territory with an idealistic approach, what Binance needs now may just be a "down-to-earth connector" like He Yi—understanding users, understanding the community, and better understanding how to bring the gigantic entity back to the essence of "service."

What do you think He Yi taking over as CEO will bring to Binance? Has her workplace perspective inspired you? Let's discuss in the comments!

$PEPE After the internal strife, the PEPE team was hacked and fell into "multiple crises". Who will guarantee the security of investors' assets?

Hey, friends in the cryptocurrency space, pay attention! Something big has happened! Today I came across news that the wildly popular PEPE coin official website in the Meme circle was hacked! In simple terms, you enter the official website without any issues, and suddenly the page “flashes” and redirects you to some dangerous link you don't know about—it's just like planning to go home but stepping into someone else's trap!

This is no small matter. Think about it, how many people just wanted to check the coin price, see the project progress, and ended up inadvertently exposing their wallet authorization or private key passwords? At best, they will be constantly harassed with messages; at worst, their digital assets could vanish without a trace. This is no joke. Although it's still unclear who did it and what they specifically want, this incident serves as a loud warning bell—"There are risks in the coin circle, click with caution" is not just a casual phrase.

So, for those of us who play with coins, grab airdrops, or rush to new projects, we really need to stay alert: Don't click on suspicious links, it's best to access the official site via bookmarks, and treat any pop-up asking for authorization or mnemonic phrases as a scam! Safety is always worth the trouble.

What do you think? Will this attack affect your view of Meme coins? How do you usually protect your crypto assets? Looking forward to chatting with you in the comments! #加密市场观察 #美联储降息周期

$ETH Ethereum's upgrade this time has directly eliminated the "free benefits"!

Brothers, Ethereum's Fusaka upgrade has directly skyrocketed the "almost free" blob fee to the heavens—Li Lihua from Liquid Capital said this fee has surged 15 million times!

Previously, this blob fee seemed almost free, consistently stuck at 1wei (approximately 0), with nodes working every day to verify data, earning less than the electricity costs; now EIP-7918 has added a "bottom line mechanism", requiring the blob fee to be ≥ 1/15 of the mainnet Gas fee, which essentially assigns a real price to resources: want to occupy Ethereum's expansion data package? You must first cover the costs!

This wave is not just a price increase; it also opens a new avenue for ETH deflation—the blob fee will now be used to destroy ETH! Some have calculated that the amount of ETH destroyed could increase by 8 times, and by 2026, this portion could account for 30% to 50% of total destruction; the hotter L2 gets, the more ETH is burned, and this deflationary buff will stack up.

Of course, some worry about rising L2 costs? Don’t worry, the upgrade has also brought PeerDAS technology, which allows for more blob storage, meaning that while prices rise, capacity has also expanded, and L2 will digest the costs itself, so users may not necessarily spend more money.

In simple terms, this is how Ethereum has cut the "free benefits": if you use resources, you must pay; if nodes work, they must earn money, and it can also make ETH scarcer.

What do you think, is this wave making the Ethereum ecosystem healthier, or will L2 start to roll on costs? Betting five cents in the comments, will L2 offer "blob fee subsidies"? #以太坊升级