常樂 Crypto Insights

The competition of Layer2 is no longer just a contest of scalability. Performance, cost, throughput—these metrics have been pushed to the extreme within a year. But the real watershed is: who can make Ethereum not only 'faster' but also 'smarter.' The significance of Linea lies here. It is not just a simple performance solution, but a self-evolution experiment driven by logic.

Linea adopts a zero-knowledge proof system (ZK-EVM) that is fully compatible with EVM, allowing any contract on Ethereum to be migrated directly without rewriting or adaptation. This may seem like just a compatibility improvement, but in reality, it is a reconstruction of ideas: no longer relying on external computing power for scalability, but enabling Ethereum itself to possess validation and reasoning capabilities.

In the history of DeFi, lending protocols have always been the core infrastructure. Whether it's Aave or Compound, everyone is using algorithms to determine interest rates and liquidity distribution through capital pools. It seems decentralized, yet it still perpetuates the traditional financial model—resources are averaged out, efficiency is diluted, and participants lack initiative.
The birth of Morpho is precisely to address this structural issue: to bring lending back to the essence of the market—direct matching of supply and demand, and precise transmission of risk and return.

Morpho is not just a simple capital pool, but an intelligent matching network. It splits the lending relationship into two tiers:

Title options

🔥 Suspenseful: The true mission of Plasma is not scalability, but to enable the blockchain to 'trust lightly.'
💬 Conversational: Do you think Plasma is useless? In fact, it is redefining the cost of security.
⚙️ Professional: State root submission, verification challenges, and layered security: the modernization of Plasma.


---

Plasma was once hailed as the 'pioneer of Ethereum's scalability' but later misinterpreted as 'outdated technology.' However, those who truly understand it know: Plasma is not a failure, but rather too ahead of its time. In today's pursuit of high TPS and modular verification, its minimal, secure, and low-cost structure is being rediscovered.

In the Ethereum ecosystem, Layer 2 competition has entered a heated stage. Everyone is talking about performance, TPS, and Gas optimization, but these metrics are just superficial. The real revolution lies not in speed, but in the collapse of trust costs. The value of Linea lies here — it does not make Ethereum faster, but makes Ethereum more 'certain'.

Linea's core technology is ZK-EVM (Zero-Knowledge Ethereum Virtual Machine), a system that can directly compress the execution logic of smart contracts into mathematical proofs. In other words, it no longer relies on 'consensus' for verification, but allows all logic to self-prove through formulas. This means that future networks will no longer be 'trusted by human nodes', but 'trusted by mathematical nodes'.

In the DeFi space, there are countless lending protocols: Aave, Compound, Maker, Venus... They are largely similar in mechanism, with differences mainly in parameters and token incentives. What Morpho does is redefine the concept of 'lending'. It not only optimizes interest rates but also reconstructs the way lenders and borrowers connect.

Morpho transforms the traditional pooled lending logic into a matching engine architecture. In this system, lenders and borrowers no longer passively accept the interest rates given by the system's algorithm; instead, the algorithm actively matches, generating optimal matching results for both parties. This way, lending becomes like a real-time negotiation, where the negotiating parties are the algorithm and the market.

In the history of blockchain scalability, Plasma is a misunderstood name. It is thought to be outdated, replaced by Rollup, and forgotten by the market. However, if we carefully study the path of technological evolution, we will find that Plasma has not 'failed'; it simply arrived too early. Today, as people revisit the discussions on data availability and validation costs, the design philosophy of Plasma is being revived.

Unlike the 'full data publication' logic of Rollup, the core idea of Plasma is state commitment + challenge exit. It does not require all data to be on-chain, only the proof of the correctness of the final state. In other words, Rollup proves the 'process', while Plasma proves the 'result'. This minimalist trust path allows Plasma to achieve a unique balance between efficiency, security, and scalability.

In the evolutionary history of blockchain, the term 'scalability' has been overused. Rollup, sharding, compression, modularization... almost all solutions claim to make transactions faster and gas cheaper, but the real issue has never been just speed. The true bottleneck is the cost of trust and verification. And Linea's revolution lies not in speed, but in ensuring that every transaction's existence can be mathematically proven, rather than assumed.

The design logic of Linea is an extension of Ethereum's philosophy: if the essence of decentralization is 'trustless', then the ultimate form of scalability should be 'no need to verify others'. This is precisely why Linea chooses zero-knowledge technology (ZK Proof) — it transforms the correctness of transactions from consensus behavior into logical facts.

If early DeFi lending replaced bank interest rates with algorithms, then Morpho's approach replaces the algorithm itself with a matching mechanism. It no longer allows users to throw funds into a public liquidity pool waiting for passive allocation; instead, it enables both lenders and borrowers to connect directly on-chain, automatically finding the optimal match through intelligent algorithms. This sounds simple, but it has far-reaching implications—this means that liquidity is no longer a 'passive pool', but an active network.

In traditional DeFi protocols, while the liquidity pool model is convenient, it sacrifices efficiency. Lenders' funds are usually loaned out at an average interest rate, and even if market demand surges, adjustments can only be made passively. Morpho redefines this structure. It combines liquidity pools with P2P matching into a 'dual-layer architecture':

Plasma was once considered a great attempt at scaling Ethereum in its early days, but it was overshadowed by the Rollup wave due to reasons like exit delays and complex interactions. However, when we thought it had been abandoned by the times, it reappeared in a new technological context. This time, it is no longer an outdated idea being replaced, but rather a 'redefined' security logic.

Unlike modern Rollups, Plasma does not pursue putting all data on the main chain, but rather uses a State Commitment Mechanism to compress block states into a Merkle root and periodically submit it to the main chain. This approach may seem 'light', but it is extremely efficient because it mathematically guarantees state correctness rather than relying on redundant data storage. The core value of this architecture lies in: low-cost deterministic security.

When people talk about Linea, they often compare it with other ZK Rollup projects in the same dimension: who is faster? Who has lower gas fees? Who generates proofs more efficiently? But this actually misses the true meaning of Linea. The goal of Linea is not just 'scaling', but to extend Ethereum into a stronger, smarter ecosystem. It is not an appendage of Layer 2, but an extension layer of Ethereum's consciousness.

The technical structure of Linea is a complete implementation of ZK-EVM, which means that all applications, contracts, and tools on Ethereum can be seamlessly migrated. It is compatible with the Solidity language and the EVM instruction set, allowing developers to deploy with almost no need to refactor logic. In simple terms, Linea is not an independent chain, but a provable mirror of Ethereum. It allows every transaction to be verified under the mathematical logic of the mainnet, making scaling both secure and controllable.

In the world of DeFi, lending is the oldest and most crowded track. Every platform talks about interest rates, liquidity, and collateral ratios, but few actually change the underlying logic of lending. In recent years, what we've seen more is copying and stacking: Aave's liquidity pools, Compound's algorithmic interest rates, Maker's collateral mechanism... Different mechanisms, but similar essence—low capital utilization, concentrated risks, and homogenized returns. Morpho has chosen a different path: instead of letting liquidity sleep, it allows supply and demand to meet directly.

The core of Morpho lies in the peer-to-peer matching layer (P2P Matching Layer). In traditional lending protocols, depositors place funds in a public pool, and borrowers withdraw from it; interest rates are determined by market supply and demand algorithms. However, this means that funds are processed on average, high-yielders are diluted, and low-risk participants are assimilated. Morpho uses an intelligent matching engine to match borrowers and lenders in real-time, achieving personalized interest rates and automated matching. The system is no longer just a fund pool, but a self-balancing lending market.

On the timeline of blockchain development, Plasma stands like a dusty lighthouse. It was once a pioneer in scaling technology but was labeled as 'outdated' after the rise of Rollups. However, today, as data availability becomes the new focus and verification economics begins to replace performance competition, the value of Plasma is redefined. It has not disappeared; rather, it supports a new form of the trust foundation for Web3 in a more underlying and hidden way.

The design philosophy of Plasma is extremely forward-looking. It proposes a state commitment architecture—off-chain execution and on-chain proof. In other words, most computations and transactions are completed off the main chain, and ultimately only the compressed state root is submitted to the main chain. This approach significantly reduces the load on the mainnet while still ensuring security and traceability. In the past, Ethereum regarded it as a scaling solution, but today, it resembles a trust compression protocol: transforming complex execution into minimal trust proofs.

When people mention Layer2, the first reaction is often 'scalability.' However, upon closer observation, you will find that this proposition is already outdated. Layer2 is no longer just a race of speed and cost, but a revolution concerning trust, governance, and liquidity structure. The emergence of Linea is a project that finds a breakthrough in this deeper competition.

The core of Linea is not simply a ZK-EVM implementation, but a fusion structure of verifiable computation and ecological governance. It achieves EVM-level compatibility through zero-knowledge proof technology, allowing for seamless migration of smart contracts while maintaining the security and determinism of the Ethereum mainnet. In other words, Linea is not 'replacing' Ethereum, but 'extending' the boundaries of Ethereum.

The existence of blockchain has been a rebellion against 'trust' from the very beginning. It rejects intermediaries, rejects authority, and rejects opaque rules. However, most blockchains have not yet completely freed themselves from the shackles of trust—we still need to believe that miners won't cheat, that nodes will synchronize, and that validators won't tamper. The birth of Linea signifies that this war over trust has finally reached its conclusion. It does not make trust safer; it makes trust completely disappear.

The core of Linea is the 'Recursive Zero-Knowledge Proof' (RZKP). Traditional zero-knowledge proofs only verify the authenticity of a specific transaction, while Linea recurses this logic layer by layer, forming a 'proof of proof'. Each block carries its own mathematical proof, which can be verified by higher-level proofs. Thus, a very small verification operation can confirm the historical state of the entire chain. The truth no longer requires consensus, as the logic itself is already self-consistent.

Stability is the illusion of all financial systems. Whether it's central bank monetary control or decentralized algorithmic stablecoins, they are essentially just mechanisms that delay the outbreak of risk. The significance of Morpho lies in its refusal to conceal risk, instead allowing the system to coexist with it. Its core logic is: instability is the essence of finance; stability must be dynamic.

Morpho's system is based on a highly radical premise – 'adaptive balance.' This is not automation in the traditional sense, but a mechanism that mimics the self-regulating properties of living organisms. The system does not seek perfect balance but looks for rhythm in fluctuations and maintains survival through feedback. It allows financial volatility to no longer be a precursor to collapse, but rather the pulse of self-renewal.

Governance has always been the most complex art in human civilization. We design laws, establish institutions, and create consensus, all to maintain order. But ironically, every governance system will ultimately be destroyed by its own humanity—power, emotions, greed, inertia, without exception. The emergence of XPL is precisely to fundamentally eliminate all of this. It is not a new governance model, but rather a system that **makes governance no longer require 'enforcement'**.

The core concept of XPL is the 'De-Willed Governance System' (DWGS). The starting point of this concept is simple— as long as power requires will to operate, corruption and inefficiency will always exist. Therefore, XPL does not grant anyone direct control over power; instead, it transforms all decision-making processes into algorithmic feedback. It achieves self-repair of the system through the 'Behavioral Reputation Model' (BRM) and the 'Logical Response Engine' (LRE). The system no longer relies on voting and approval but generates governance actions in real time through behavioral data.

Among all Layer 2 projects, Linea's ambition has never been hidden. It does not merely pursue higher throughput and lower Gas fees, but fundamentally questions the very meaning of 'trust.' It poses a question capable of disrupting social structures: If everything can be mathematically verified, is trust still necessary? This is a reconstruction of the logic of civilization. Because in the world of Linea, truth no longer relies on human consensus but is directly generated by algorithms.

The core foundation of Linea is Recursive Zero-Knowledge Proof (RZKP). The key to this technology lies in the 'proof of proof'—it allows the system to verify thousands of transactions with an extremely small mathematical proof. Each transaction is logically compressed into a verifiable proof chain. In other words, the system does not need to recalculate history but simply verify the correctness of logic. Thus, for the first time, truth shifts from 'replay' to 'inheritance.'

In the wave of decentralized finance, countless protocols have fallen due to the same issue: they know how to create profits but do not understand how to manage risks. The birth of Morpho is to answer this question—if finance can self-regulate like life, does it still need regulation? It is not a simple lending protocol but a structural system that can 'self-balance,' a financial intelligence that can sense, react, and repair.

The traditional financial system, whether centralized or decentralized, is inherently fragile. They rely on external forces to maintain stability—central banks regulating liquidity, DAO votes adjusting parameters, foundations fixing vulnerabilities—each intervention is an input from an external force. Morpho's philosophy is completely different: it is not a system of 'fixing' but a system of 'self-healing.' It transforms stability from an outcome into a process, allowing the market to react to itself.

Among all decentralized concepts, the most challenging aspect to implement is not technology, but governance. People can design perfect consensus mechanisms, but they cannot create a stable consensus process. Once governance involves people, it signifies emotions, interests, and shortsightedness. What XPL aims to address is precisely this dilemma — allowing institutions to rely not on human rationality but on structural rationality. Its emergence has given blockchain a true 'political system' for the first time, and this system does not belong to anyone.

The governance structure of XPL is not based on voting or proposals, but on the foundation of 'algorithmic feedback.' Its core mechanism — 'Autonomous Adjustment Engine' (AAE) — allows the system to automatically make corrections when deviations are detected. For example, when the execution efficiency of a proposal declines, funding allocation becomes unbalanced, or node behavior is abnormal, AAE will automatically trigger adjustment logic: increasing the weight of active nodes, restricting high-risk capital flows, or even freezing governance privileges. Governance actions no longer require approval but become the system's self-defense reflex.

In the past decade, every advancement in blockchain has weakened the notion of "trust." Bitcoin escaped centralization through proof of work; Ethereum replaced authority with smart contracts; and Linea poses the ultimate question at a deeper level: if logic can self-prove, why still trust? This is a question that shakes the millennia-old belief systems of human society. Because in the world of Linea, truth no longer requires anyone to "believe"; it exists directly in mathematical form.

The core of Linea lies in "Recursive Zero-Knowledge Proof (RZKP)." Simply put, it is a technology that allows the system to prove its correctness without exposing data. However, Linea extends this principle to the entire operational layer of the chain: every transaction, every piece of data, and every state change is compressed into a verifiable mathematical proof. Verifying a proof is equivalent to verifying the entire block. This extreme compression mechanism enables the truth to spread at the speed of logic. It is not a product of consensus but a conclusion of logic.