币圈意哥

Why Most Public Chains Are Copies or Improvements
Technical Logic is Replicable:
The core technologies of blockchain (PoW/PoS, smart contracts, cross-chain, storage) are essentially open-source algorithms.
New chains can optimize performance, reduce costs, and increase TPS based on existing technologies.
Model Repetition:
Most new chains are still "smart contract platforms + native tokens + DeFi/NFT/application ecosystems," merely making parameter adjustments or promotional differentiations.
Ecological Barriers are Key:
While technology replication is easy, replicating ecosystems and user trust is difficult.
The underlying chains like ETH, BTC, CKB are not easily replaceable because ecology, consensus, security, and network effects create a moat #ckb .

The reasons why many coins will disappear are simply due to short-term speculation. When you buy, the price may rise, but the reason it will ultimately go to zero is;

Meme coins and community coins are typical high-risk types. These coins mainly rely on emotions and community enthusiasm for support, without underlying assets or applications backing them. When the enthusiasm fades, their value almost goes to zero, and their long-term viability is very low.

Short-lived application tokens also carry huge risks. Many DApps issue tokens to attract users, but the applications themselves may not be able to operate long-term. After a DApp shuts down, these tokens are likely to lose any value.

The native coins of small copy chains belong to a high-risk category. They have similar functions to large public chains but lack ecology, developers, and asset reliance. Without long-term user support, these coins may eventually be eliminated by the market.

Speculative NFT market tokens are high-risk. Relying solely on popular NFTs or concepts to maintain value, when users leave or the NFT market is sluggish, these tokens may quickly go to zero.

Short-term social/game tokens may also disappear. If the user activity of on-chain social or game projects is low, and the gameplay is singular, tokens lack real application support, making it difficult to maintain value after the enthusiasm fades. #归零币

The crypto space has now evolved into many clear directions (tracks/categories), each with different projects and tokens. 1. Layer 1

The underlying public chains fundamentally support the entire ecosystem, constructing the core value layer where assets, smart contracts, states, and consensus reside.

2. Layer 2 / Layer 0

Providing scalability, speed enhancements, and low fees for the underlying chains is key to ecological scalability.

3. Decentralized Finance (DeFi)

DeFi signifies the on-chain provision of financial services and is one of the core application directions in the crypto space.

4. Stablecoins

Pegged to fiat currencies and maintaining stable value, they are the cornerstone of on-chain payments and contract settlements.

5. NFTs and Digital Collectibles

Representing digital ownership and the creative economy, they were among the first waves to attract the public in Web3.

6. On-chain Data, Indexing, and Middleware

This direction addresses the issue of "how on-chain data can be used and accessed."

7. Decentralized Storage and Physical Infrastructure (DePIN)

8. Oracle Layer

A key bridge for bringing real-world data on-chain. Without oracles, many DeFi applications cannot operate.

9. Quantum Resistance, Security, and Cryptographic Infrastructure

Security solutions against future quantum computing threats, representing a long-term foundational security direction.

10. Data Computation, AI, and On-chain Agents

A direction integrating blockchain and artificial intelligence, one of the hot trends for 2025.

11. Social / Web3 Communication

On-chain social protocols, identity protocols, and decentralized social economic systems.

12. GameFi / Metaverse

The direction of on-chain gaming economies and the assetization of virtual worlds. Example directions: virtual real estate, on-chain gaming economic systems, and tokenization of digital world assets.

13. RWA (Real World Assets On-chain)

This direction tokenizes real-world assets, such as real estate, stocks, and bonds. It is currently trending towards becoming a frontier for institutions and compliance.

14. Meme Coins & Community Tokens

A category driven purely by emotion, including meme culture, rebellious tokens, etc. #币的类型

Calm down and do not be influenced by short-term prices. The cryptocurrency market has too much hype, with countless replicated chains and application layer projects emerging one after another, many of which return to zero after a brief period of popularity. True value does not lie in gimmicks, but in underlying logic and ecological support.

Truly valuable coins are foundational public chains. They carry assets, support applications, and have strong ecological dependencies. BTC, ETH, BNB, CKB, ADA, SOL; they are not just short-term speculation but long-term infrastructure. Upper-layer applications may change, but their underlying ledgers and asset values are irreplaceable.

Choosing valuable coins is not just about looking at prices, but also about examining the ecosystem. Look at how many assets depend on them, and how many applications and protocols are built on top of them. A solid foundation, an active ecosystem, and mature technology are where true value lies.

Calm down and refuse to follow the crowd. Short-term price spikes and drops are merely noise; long-term value determines the future. BTC's scarcity, ETH's smart contract ecosystem, CKB's asset carrying and Layer2, are all irreplaceable existences.

Investing is not speculation; choose the fundamentals, choose long-term. Calm down, recognize truly valuable coins, and you can navigate the waves of the cryptocurrency market steadily, without being misled by short-term heat and speculation. #CKB/USDT

Countless public chains may go to zero; many public chains are copies or speculative, and when the hype disappears, these public chains vanish. However, some public chains will exist forever.

BTC is the cornerstone of the cryptocurrency world, often referred to as digital gold. Its value comes from scarcity, security, and global recognition. Regardless of market fluctuations, BTC carries the most core value storage function and is the foundation of trust for all digital assets.

ETH is the core of the smart contract ecosystem, supporting the vast majority of DeFi, NFT, and stablecoins. The application layer may change, but the underlying ledger and smart contract network are irreplaceable. The depth of the ETH ecosystem determines its long-term stability and value, making it unlikely to be easily replaced.

BNB Chain has a large user base and a mature trading ecosystem. The stable growth in trading volume and number of applications has made it one of the most dynamic public chains in the cryptocurrency world. The core value of BNB Chain lies in the continuous operation of its ecosystem and asset dependence.

CKB (Nervos) is the underlying chain for asset support and Layer 2 expansion. Upper-layer applications can change, but the state ledger and asset settlement functions of CKB are irreplaceable. Its long-term value is built on ecosystem dependence, technological stability, and asset support capacity.

ADA (Cardano) is a research-driven smart contract platform known for its high security and technological stability. Although the pace of ecosystem development is slow, its long-term value lies in underlying stability, significant future ecosystem potential, and asset support and governance capabilities.

SOL (Solana) is known for its high performance, fast transaction speeds, and active ecosystem. It supports a large number of applications and assets; the high throughput and scalability of the underlying network ensure long-term value. Even if the application layer changes, the underlying functionality of SOL remains irreplaceable.

Most other public chains in the cryptocurrency world belong to copycat, application-layer, or speculative chains. Their ecosystem dependence is weak, and they lack asset support capabilities. Once the hype fades, they are easily replaced or eliminated, and their chances of long-term survival are far inferior to #BTC, #ETH, #BNB, #CKB, #ADA, #SOL. #ckb
#eth #btc #ada #sol

#CKB , the reason why CKB will never go to zero$
Fundamentality and irreplaceability

CKB is not a token of a specific application, game, or NFT; it is the state storage, consensus, and security foundation of the entire ecosystem.
The ultimate security and asset proof of all Layer 2, cross-chain bridges, wallets, NFT markets, and DeFi protocols depend on CKB.
Even if the application layer collapses or the interface disappears, the underlying state of CKB still exists and supports the operation of other assets.
This means that its value-bearing role is long-term and irreplaceable.

Asset Dependence
Currently, there are hundreds of tokens, cross-chain assets, and Layer 2 protocol tokens that rely on the security and state of CKB.
These assets cannot exist independently "away from the underlying"; if CKB goes to zero, these assets will also lose value.
In other words, the flow of funds and asset operations of the entire ecosystem are built on CKB, and the disappearance of the underlying layer would almost certainly trigger the collapse of the entire ecosystem.
Security Model and Consensus Mechanism

CKB uses PoW (Proof of Work) + UTXO model, ensuring that the state is immutable and asset finality.
This mechanism has been running on-chain for many years and has been widely validated; its security and robustness cannot be compared to short-term applications or hot tokens.
Even if Layer 2 or cross-chain bridges encounter problems, CKB itself, as the Layer 1 foundation, still exists independently.

Application Layer Replaceable vs. Underlying Irreplaceable
Applications like OpenSea, NFT markets, and decentralized exchanges are always subject to replacement.
CKB carries the underlying logic that all application layers depend on; it is not a single project, but rather the fundamental support for the operation of the entire ecosystem.
Thus, its likelihood of going to zero is far lower than that of any single application or token.

Conclusion
CKB is the foundation of Nervos and the value-bearing layer of the entire ecosystem. Applications may rise and fall, interfaces may update, but the existence and security of the underlying layer will not disappear. Therefore, from a long-term investment perspective, its risk of going to zero is extremely low and can be understood as a typical characteristic of infrastructure tokens.

CKB is the core foundation of the Nervos ecosystem. It is not just a simple token, but the cornerstone of the entire network. It provides state storage, network security, and consensus assurance, which are prerequisites for Layer 2, smart contracts, and cross-chain asset operations. In other words, any transaction, asset transfer, or contract execution that occurs on Nervos relies on the support of CKB. It is not an accessory for short-term applications, but a necessity for the ecosystem's long-term existence.

Above CKB, the sUDT token standard allows developers to create generic assets, including stablecoins, cross-chain mapped assets, and Layer 2 protocol tokens. These tokens do not depend on the popularity of a single application or interface; what they rely on is the state storage and security assurance provided by CKB. Even if the front-end applications are replaced, the existence and value of these tokens remain unshakable. They are the foundational bearing layer of the ecosystem and the true source of long-term value.

The Godwoken Layer 2 further strengthens Nervos's foundational construction capabilities. Behind high-performance smart contracts and complex applications, the security of all Layer 2 tokens ultimately relies on CKB's state verification. This means that even if trading platforms, NFT markets, or DeFi protocols continuously change, the security of the assets they carry will not disappear. CKB is the underlying consensus, an irreplaceable long-term value support, and a prerequisite for all innovations.

Cross-chain assets also play a fundamental role in the CKB ecosystem. Mainstream assets like BTC and ETH are bridged and mapped as sUDT, which can be used on Nervos, but their existence still relies on the underlying state storage and consensus verification of CKB. The liquidity, asset interoperability, and long-term security of the entire ecosystem depend on this foundational layer. It is not a short-term hotspot of a certain application, but the core of the system's operation.

Application layers can be replaced, interfaces can be updated, and gameplay can be rotated, but the existence of tokens, Layer 2 protocols, and cross-chain assets built on CKB is irreplaceable. Their value will not disappear with fluctuations in user sentiment or market heat but will continue to strengthen with the expansion of the ecosystem and the growth of on-chain complexity. CKB and its constructed foundational layer are the value center that time and technological evolution cannot erase. #CKB

The reason why application layer projects are constantly being replaced is not that they lack users, but because they are in the position within the system that is the easiest to replace. They directly face traffic, emotions, and narratives; as soon as a lower-cost, better experience, or stronger incentive alternative appears, user migration is almost instantaneous.
Applications like Uniswap, Aave, and OpenSea have been extremely successful at their respective stages, but they address 'how to use blockchain' rather than 'whether blockchain can be used.' Once the methods of transaction, incentive structures, or user preferences change, they must continuously evolve; otherwise, they will be overshadowed by new applications.
In contrast, projects like GRT do not participate in application layer competition. What they address is how on-chain data is organized, indexed, and queried, which is a prerequisite that must be solved before any application exists. Applications can change, but the act of reading on-chain state cannot disappear.
The same logic applies to oracles and data layers. LINK does not care which DeFi protocol users are using; it only cares whether on-chain contracts can obtain reliable external information. Filecoin and Arweave also do not care which specific application is storing data; they only serve the structural need that 'data must be preserved for the long term.'
Therefore, the value of assets like ETH, GRT, and LINK does not come from the success of a specific generation of applications, but from the continuous reliance of the entire system on them. As the ecosystem expands, the number of chains increases, and system complexity rises, this reliance will only strengthen, not weaken.
The application layer will not disappear, but will continually be compressed and replaced, eventually becoming interchangeable interactive shells. What can truly transcend cycles are the foundational building assets that define rules, standards, and prerequisites, rather than the most dazzling applications in the short term. #GRT.

The discussion about whether GRT "will not die" is essentially not about a specific project, but rather about what kind of things possess long-term viability within a technical system. Historically, what has truly existed for the long term has never been at the application layer, but at the protocol layer and the infrastructure layer.

Applications die because they solve temporary problems. They rely on specific user behaviors, interface habits, market preferences, and narrative environments. When external conditions change—whether due to technological upgrades, regulatory changes, or user migration—applications are replaced. It’s not that they are not excellent; rather, their positions are inherently exposed to competition.

The position of GRT is completely different. It does not directly engage in user competition or functional competition; instead, it addresses a more fundamental and unavoidable issue: how on-chain data is organized, queried, and verified. As long as the blockchain is a state machine and as long as on-chain activities continue to occur, there must be an indexing layer; otherwise, the data itself cannot be used efficiently.

From a system architecture perspective, GRT belongs to the "non-bypassable layer." The application layer can be replaced, but once the indexing layer establishes standards, it becomes a common dependency for the entire ecosystem. The more applications built on the same indexing structure, the higher the migration costs become; this cost is not about market sentiment, but rather engineering reality.

Applications are prone to die also because they must continuously prove that "they are better than others." Infrastructure only needs to prove one thing: whether it is widely relied upon. #grt

First, let's compare application-based projects.
Applications rely on users, traffic, narrative, and emotion. What you use today may be replaced by new gameplay tomorrow. An application that was popular last year may no longer be mentioned this year; this is not because it is bad, but because applications are inherently like that. However, GRT does not rely on whether users like it or not; it only depends on "do you still want to use on-chain data?" As long as the chain is alive, GRT will not die.

Next, let's compare projects that are also focused on infrastructure.
Many infrastructures are "specific to a certain chain" or "a certain direction"; if the chain fails, they will suffer as well. But GRT does not bet on a single chain or a single track; it only bets on one thing: all chains and all protocols need to be queried. The more chains and protocols there are, the busier GRT becomes.

Now, let's compare narrative-driven projects.
Narrative projects depend on market attention; once people stop talking about them, prices will gradually decline. GRT's growth does not rely on whether people are discussing it, but rather on whether there are users in the background. Even if no one tweets about it, as long as the query volume is increasing, it is quietly becoming stronger. These types of projects are least afraid of being overlooked.

Next, let's compare highly imaginative but uncertain projects.
Some projects sound impressive, but whether they will succeed depends on whether they can deliver in the coming years. GRT is different; it is not about "will it be useful," but rather "is it already being widely used," even if you cannot see it in your daily life. The biggest fear in the long term is uncertainty, and GRT's greatest advantage is its certainty.

So why is this suitable for long-term holding?
Because the core of long-term holding is not about explosive growth, but about "not being eliminated by the times." If you hold an application long-term, you are betting it will always be ahead; if you hold a narrative long-term, you are betting the story won’t break; if you hold GRT long-term, you only need to bet on one thing: that blockchain is still alive.

There is also a point that many people overlook.
As the cycle progresses, Web3 becomes more complex, with more chains and more chaotic data, and the demand for indexing and organizing will only increase, not decrease. GRT belongs to the type of project that "the more the industry develops, the more important it becomes," rather than the type that "as the industry develops, it gets replaced."

Therefore, whether GRT is worth holding long-term is essentially not about looking at short-term gains, but about whether it is the kind of thing that must still exist in ten years. Applications may not be, but things like GRT are unrealistic to disappear. #GRT

GRT's biggest difference from other projects can be summed up in one sentence: other things are about "how usable it is," while it is about "whether it can be used." Without it, many applications you use daily wouldn't even have the qualifications to open.
Many people think that on-chain data is public, as if anyone can use it, but that's not the case at all. The raw data is just a pile of garbage, unorganized, uncategorized, and unindexed, and developers don't even know where to start. What GRT does is turn this pile of garbage into something that can be directly consumed.
Many of the DeFi, NFT, marketplace, and social applications you use are essentially "reading data," and this data doesn't just come running to you; it's sorted out one by one by GRT. Without GRT, these applications would be blind.
You might not know you've used GRT, but as long as you've used on-chain applications, you are already reliant on it. This is not advertising; it's a fact. Truly great infrastructure is like this: you don't feel it, but once it stops, the whole world freezes.
The success of an application depends on luck, its survival depends on cycles, but GRT doesn't play by these rules. Whether in a bull market or a bear market, as long as the chain is still producing blocks, there must be someone to help organize the data. This task will always be needed, and it's growing in demand.
Many projects survive by telling stories; when the stories run out, the price collapses, but GRT doesn't rely on stories. It relies on "no one can do without it." Developers can switch applications, switch tracks, and switch narratives, but in the end, they find that after going around in circles, they still have to return to GRT.
If you want to make a comparison, GRT is like electricity and water: usually, no one praises it, but if it’s gone, you can't survive a minute. It doesn't determine what applications you play, but it does determine whether you can play them.
So when it comes to whether GRT is important, it's not a matter of opinion; it's a matter of common sense. It's not about whether it will succeed in the future, but that it has already succeeded to the point where you don't need to discuss it anymore.
Many people are still asking whether GRT is worth paying attention to; the real question should be, what will happen to the entire Web3 if one day it stops? The answer is simple: it will collapse. #GRT📈

$GRT
GRT is different from many applications; it is not designed for users but for the order of the entire Web3. While most projects are thinking about how to gain attention, GRT has already stood outside of attention, quietly deciding which data can be seen, called, and combined. You rarely see it in the foreground, but you can hardly bypass it.
In the crypto world, public data does not equal usable data. On-chain raw information is chaotic, decentralized, and cannot be directly consumed by applications; without an indexing system, even the most elegant applications are just shells. What GRT does is not function enhancement, but rather makes the act of 'using' itself possible.
Many people mistakenly believe that GRT is a project in a specific track, but in fact, it does not bet on any narrative. DeFi, NFT, Social, DAO, AI— as long as the chain is still operating, it needs to be queried, validated, and read. GRT does not take sides on hot topics; it serves all hot topics, which is also why it is difficult to price based on short-term sentiment.
You might think you have never used GRT, but when you open any application that relies on on-chain data, you are already using it. Its success lies precisely in the fact that you do not need to know of its existence; true infrastructure is never remembered, but rather taken for granted.
Applications will repeatedly change over cycles, protocols will be eliminated by the market, but the demand for data indexing will not disappear. Each bear and bull market transition will wash away a large number of narrative-driven projects, but instead reinforce the value of underlying infrastructure, because what remains needs stable, verifiable, and scalable foundations more than ever.
GRT's moat does not come from marketing or community sentiment, but from real engineering costs and ecological dependencies. Once a protocol chooses GRT's indexing method, migration is no longer a simple technical switch, but a system-level reconstruction; this cost cannot be driven by sentiment.
Many people feel that GRT's story is not sexy enough because its growth does not manifest in daily price fluctuations but rather in the whole ecosystem's default reliance on it years later. Its expansion is quiet, yet irreversible. #grt

This year, I sold my house, sold my car,
raised ten million RMB, and did only one thing: buy CKB.
It is not impulsive, not a gamble, but a choice made after repeated understanding.
What I see is not the short-term price, but a path that is undervalued, ignored, yet solid enough.
In this market, too many people chase pleasure, but few are willing to bet on infrastructure.
What can truly support the future is never noise, but structure.
CKB is slow, difficult, and quiet, but it is doing the right thing.
When most people only ask, "Can it still rise?" I ask, "Can it survive for ten years, twenty years?"
I am willing to exchange real assets for a ticket to a long-term world.
If it fails, this is the price I pay for my understanding.
If it succeeds, I will witness a foundational system evolve from being overlooked to being irreplaceable.
I do not need everyone to understand, nor do I need consensus to arrive now. $CKB

If you buy a certain coin, it is not only about team building but also about holder building. If you purchase this coin, you need to promote it yourself. The more you buy, the more you need to promote it. Even if it's just promoting a piece of information, it is contributing to the community and the coin price #美联储利率决议

Self-investing in CKB, if we don't build, who will build?
We choose to participate because we understand the long term, not because we believe in the short term.
There are no myths of quick money here, only infrastructure that has been polished layer by layer.
Every line of code, every test, every discussion reinforces the consensus.
Prices are determined by the market, but value can only be created by builders.
If we only focus on the ups and downs, CKB will remain in the narrative.
If we are willing to take action, it can truly become a usable, scalable, and reliable network.
Ecology is not something that can be waited for; it grows through repeated attempts and failures.
Today's seemingly small contributions will become an irreplaceable part of the future system.
Construction may be slow, but slow does not mean weak; slow is to go further.
When speculators leave, what remains is the true consensus.
We are not just passing through this project; we are rooting here.
The value of CKB does not lie in how others evaluate it, but in what we have done.
Walk the long road, do the difficult things, and dedicate time to the construction itself.
What ultimately remains is not just a price curve, but a truly functioning world. #CKB是最好的BTCL2 $CKB

Investing in CKB by ourselves, if we don't build it, who will?
We are not waiting for the ecosystem to mature before entering; it is those who enter that will build the ecosystem step by step.
Prices will fluctuate, but the code, tools, and community will not be created in vain.
CKB does not rely on hype; it relies on every willing individual.
Investment is not just observation; holding itself is a responsibility.
It's okay to go slow, as long as we continue to build in the same direction.
The future of CKB is not theirs; it is what we create with our own hands. #ckb

The real extreme is not whether 'CKB will rise 1000 times', but that in your lifetime, you may never encounter a second opportunity for ordinary people to stand at the bottom. The fate of the vast majority is not to be defeated, but to be slowly cooked in the warm water of repeated 'let's wait and see', 'no rush', and 'wait for confirmation'.

You think you are being rational, but in reality, you are just afraid to bear the consequences of your choices. Because once you admit that CKB, as a fundamental asset, has the potential to succeed, you must face a harsher question: if it really succeeds, and you did nothing back then, who will bear the responsibility?

History has never lacked 'people who understood but didn't take action'. The real tragedy is not ignorance, but the conscious miss. The most terrifying aspect of CKB right now is that it gives you ample reason to ignore it—it's not lively, not thrilling, not soaring, and doesn't please anyone—but all these characteristics are precisely the common traits before the birth of great infrastructures.

What does 1000 times mean? It means that when the world finally needs it, the price won't just rise; it will leap directly into the range of 'you no longer deserve to hesitate'. That’s not giving you a chance; it’s telling you: the positions have already been allocated. The only thing left for you is to reflect on your judgment from back then and then comfort yourself with 'who knew at the time'.

The truly cruel aspect of fate is that it never forces you to participate. It allows you to observe, mock, analyze, and rationally withdraw. Until one day, you suddenly realize that the window to change your fate has closed, and you can't even be counted as a failure because you never placed a bet.

If CKB ultimately proves itself, it will not apologize to anyone. It won't care how cautious, rational, or mature you were back then. The era only records results, not hesitations.

So this is not a text about getting rich quickly; it is a stark reminder: some choices, once missed, will never return in a way 'ordinary people can bear'. And CKB stands at the position that is most easily underestimated and also most easily regretted.

You may think it is extreme now, but looking back in the future, you might find—what is extreme is never the judgment, but your underestimation of the pressure of time on fate. #CKB是最好的BTCL2