Bitbull Noah
Web3 Maximalist | Researcher & Analyst | Exploring the future of decentralized intelligence | Unfiltered Thoughts On-chain & Alpha Insights Crypto Stories
19 ဖော်လိုလုပ်ထားသည်
100 ဖော်လိုလုပ်သူများ
260 လိုက်ခ်လုပ်ထားသည်
7 မျှဝေထားသည်
All
Quotes
Memecoin dominance is sitting near cycle lows
Lower than levels seen during the 2022 to 2023 bear market
The last comparable period was February 2024
At that time sentiment was similar
Participation was thin
Prices were compressed
Most traders had written the sector off
Shortly after that point
Several large memecoins saw outsized moves
Not because fundamentals changed
But because positioning and attention were already exhausted
The current setup
Today many major memecoins are down between 80 and 99 percent from highs
Liquidity is thin
Volumes are muted
Public interest is low
The prevailing narrative is exhaustion
That the sector has already played out
This mirrors earlier cycle behavior
What matters here
This is not a claim that a rally is guaranteed
And it is not a call to buy
Historically
Extreme pessimism in a crowded retail sector
Often coincides with low positioning
When capital rotates
It tends to move where expectations are already minimal
The open question
If memecoins are considered finished
Who is still positioned to sell
And if no one is paying attention
What happens when attention returns even briefly
$DOGE $SHIB
Lower than levels seen during the 2022 to 2023 bear market
The last comparable period was February 2024
At that time sentiment was similar
Participation was thin
Prices were compressed
Most traders had written the sector off
Shortly after that point
Several large memecoins saw outsized moves
Not because fundamentals changed
But because positioning and attention were already exhausted
The current setup
Today many major memecoins are down between 80 and 99 percent from highs
Liquidity is thin
Volumes are muted
Public interest is low
The prevailing narrative is exhaustion
That the sector has already played out
This mirrors earlier cycle behavior
What matters here
This is not a claim that a rally is guaranteed
And it is not a call to buy
Historically
Extreme pessimism in a crowded retail sector
Often coincides with low positioning
When capital rotates
It tends to move where expectations are already minimal
The open question
If memecoins are considered finished
Who is still positioned to sell
And if no one is paying attention
What happens when attention returns even briefly
$DOGE $SHIB
Buying gold and silver right now feels a lot like buying $BTC and $ETH at the 2021 peak.
$XAU
$XAU
Before the Fall: The Undisclosed Agreement That Preceded the $LIBRA Collapse
New records suggest a quiet agreement preceded the $LIBRA collapse
This is not a finding of guilt
It is a reconstruction of events and timing
The meeting
On January 30 2025 Hayden Davis met Javier Milei inside Casa Rosada
The meeting lasted roughly twenty minutes
Official logs list the topic as blockchain
That day a confidential agreement was signed
The agreement
ThE document named Davis an ad honorem advisor to the Argentine state
The scope covered blockchain and artificial intelligence
Areas listed included
• Document digitization
• Smart contracts
• Technical training
The contract waived fees
It imposed strict confidentiality clauses
The agreement was not publicly disclosed
The timing
Two weeks later on February 14
The $LIBRA token launched in Dallas
After a public message from Milei
The token price rose sharply
Then collapsed
The message was deleted
Milei later said he was unaware of the project details
Transfers under review
On the day of the Casa Rosada meeting
Wallets linked to Davis sent more than $1M to an Argentine intermediary
Before the token launch
Investigators identified about $5.7M in crypto transfers
Prosecutors are examining whether these flows were connected to promotion or access
Early positioning
Authorities also identified early $LIBRA purchases
Wallets linked to a crypto promoter bought before public attention
Estimated gains reached around $180K
This raised questions about advance knowledge and coordination
An additional layer
Records show no public decree authorizing a foreign ad honorem advisor
Legal analysts note that such roles typically require disclosure
Investigators are also reviewing whether the confidentiality clauses limited internal oversight
And whether the agreement created implied endorsement ahead of the launch
These elements were not publicly discussed at the time
What happens now
Two investigations are active
One in New York
One in Argentina
Authorities are examining
• Indirect payments
• Money laundering risks
• Political responsibility in promotion
Investigators also noted activity in safe deposit boxes days after the collapse
Open questions
The documents do not prove coordination
They do establish proximity timing and financial movement
What remains unresolved is whether the agreement was advisory in name only
Or part of a broader structure that became visible only after LIBRA failed
This is not a finding of guilt
It is a reconstruction of events and timing
The meeting
On January 30 2025 Hayden Davis met Javier Milei inside Casa Rosada
The meeting lasted roughly twenty minutes
Official logs list the topic as blockchain
That day a confidential agreement was signed
The agreement
ThE document named Davis an ad honorem advisor to the Argentine state
The scope covered blockchain and artificial intelligence
Areas listed included
• Document digitization
• Smart contracts
• Technical training
The contract waived fees
It imposed strict confidentiality clauses
The agreement was not publicly disclosed
The timing
Two weeks later on February 14
The $LIBRA token launched in Dallas
After a public message from Milei
The token price rose sharply
Then collapsed
The message was deleted
Milei later said he was unaware of the project details
Transfers under review
On the day of the Casa Rosada meeting
Wallets linked to Davis sent more than $1M to an Argentine intermediary
Before the token launch
Investigators identified about $5.7M in crypto transfers
Prosecutors are examining whether these flows were connected to promotion or access
Early positioning
Authorities also identified early $LIBRA purchases
Wallets linked to a crypto promoter bought before public attention
Estimated gains reached around $180K
This raised questions about advance knowledge and coordination
An additional layer
Records show no public decree authorizing a foreign ad honorem advisor
Legal analysts note that such roles typically require disclosure
Investigators are also reviewing whether the confidentiality clauses limited internal oversight
And whether the agreement created implied endorsement ahead of the launch
These elements were not publicly discussed at the time
What happens now
Two investigations are active
One in New York
One in Argentina
Authorities are examining
• Indirect payments
• Money laundering risks
• Political responsibility in promotion
Investigators also noted activity in safe deposit boxes days after the collapse
Open questions
The documents do not prove coordination
They do establish proximity timing and financial movement
What remains unresolved is whether the agreement was advisory in name only
Or part of a broader structure that became visible only after LIBRA failed
My BaseApp holiday reward landed
$65 in 3 days
Not bad at all
Base is now my my full time social layer
This is not just $65
It feels like hope during a chaotic market
Appreciate baseapp for building when things feel uncertain
#BaseApp
$65 in 3 days
Not bad at all
Base is now my my full time social layer
This is not just $65
It feels like hope during a chaotic market
Appreciate baseapp for building when things feel uncertain
#BaseApp
Bitcoin isn’t stuck by accident it’s being pinned
If you’re wondering why BTC keeps oscillating between ~$85k and ~$90k no matter the news or sentiment, here’s the real reason.
It’s options.
BTC is sitting on a key options “flip” zone around ~$88k.
Above ~$88k
Market makers are forced to sell strength and buy dips. Rallies get capped fast and price gets pulled back to the middle.
Below ~$88k
The behavior flips. Selling starts to accelerate instead of being absorbed, and volatility expands.
That’s why price keeps snapping back to the same range. It’s not traders. It’s hedging mechanics.
Now the $90k wall.
There’s a huge cluster of call options at $90,000, and dealers are short those calls.
When price approaches $90k, they hedge by selling spot BTC.
So every breakout attempt runs straight into forced supply. That’s why $90k keeps rejecting.
On the downside, $85k is acting like a magnet.
Heavy put positioning there means dealers hedge drops by buying spot.
That’s why dips get bought almost instantly.
Result: a tight, frustrating range that looks calm but isn’t stable.
Why this matters now
A large portion of this options exposure expires on December 26.
Around 75% of the current gamma pressure disappears after that.
Once those options roll off, the forces pinning BTC in place vanish.
Not because sentiment changes but because the hedging flows do.
Translation: this range won’t last much longer.
After expiry, BTC is finally free to move.
If you’re wondering why BTC keeps oscillating between ~$85k and ~$90k no matter the news or sentiment, here’s the real reason.
It’s options.
BTC is sitting on a key options “flip” zone around ~$88k.
Above ~$88k
Market makers are forced to sell strength and buy dips. Rallies get capped fast and price gets pulled back to the middle.
Below ~$88k
The behavior flips. Selling starts to accelerate instead of being absorbed, and volatility expands.
That’s why price keeps snapping back to the same range. It’s not traders. It’s hedging mechanics.
Now the $90k wall.
There’s a huge cluster of call options at $90,000, and dealers are short those calls.
When price approaches $90k, they hedge by selling spot BTC.
So every breakout attempt runs straight into forced supply. That’s why $90k keeps rejecting.
On the downside, $85k is acting like a magnet.
Heavy put positioning there means dealers hedge drops by buying spot.
That’s why dips get bought almost instantly.
Result: a tight, frustrating range that looks calm but isn’t stable.
Why this matters now
A large portion of this options exposure expires on December 26.
Around 75% of the current gamma pressure disappears after that.
Once those options roll off, the forces pinning BTC in place vanish.
Not because sentiment changes but because the hedging flows do.
Translation: this range won’t last much longer.
After expiry, BTC is finally free to move.
Me everytime someone asked did i reach my goal this year.
$BTC
$BTC
Who’s really behind this
I bought alts to retire my family.
Now my mom and dad picked up extra shifts too.
Crypto really said team effort.
$RARE
I bought alts to retire my family.
Now my mom and dad picked up extra shifts too.
Crypto really said team effort.
$RARE
My scalping strategy in one picture
I don’t predict direction
I react to structure
Range highs get faded
Range lows get bought
Small size
Tight invalidation
Quick exits
Most trades last minutes not hours
Scalping isn’t about being right
It’s about surviving chop and stacking small wins
$BTC
I don’t predict direction
I react to structure
Range highs get faded
Range lows get bought
Small size
Tight invalidation
Quick exits
Most trades last minutes not hours
Scalping isn’t about being right
It’s about surviving chop and stacking small wins
$BTC
State of 2025 Token Launches a reality check (by Memento Research)
Memento Research reviewed 118 token launches in 2025 and the data is brutal.
Nearly 85% of tokens are trading below their TGE valuation.
The median outcome since launch is -71% FDV and -67% market cap.
Only 15% of launches are green. The rest are deep in the red.
The most striking result: 28 projects launched at ≥ $1B FDV
0% of them are up today
Median drawdown: -81%
Big launches didn’t grow into their valuations they dragged the entire year down. That’s why the FDV-weighted index (-61.5%) looks far worse than the equal weighted one (-33.3%).
Category breakdown shows more pain than promise:
Infra & AI made up ~60% of launches and were punished hardest (-72% to -82% medians)
DeFi quietly had the best hit rate (32% green)
Perp DEXs stood out, but largely due to a single outlier
Gaming, stablecoins, and DeSi offered little relief
The clean takeaway is simple: TGE in 2025 was not early.
For most projects, it marked the top.
Lower-FDV launches were the only group with a meaningful survival rate, while higher starting valuations consistently led to deeper repricing.
2025 wasn’t just a bad year for alts.
It was a valuation reset where hype lost to math, and size became a liability.
#USGDPUpdate $AAVE
Memento Research reviewed 118 token launches in 2025 and the data is brutal.
Nearly 85% of tokens are trading below their TGE valuation.
The median outcome since launch is -71% FDV and -67% market cap.
Only 15% of launches are green. The rest are deep in the red.
The most striking result: 28 projects launched at ≥ $1B FDV
0% of them are up today
Median drawdown: -81%
Big launches didn’t grow into their valuations they dragged the entire year down. That’s why the FDV-weighted index (-61.5%) looks far worse than the equal weighted one (-33.3%).
Category breakdown shows more pain than promise:
Infra & AI made up ~60% of launches and were punished hardest (-72% to -82% medians)
DeFi quietly had the best hit rate (32% green)
Perp DEXs stood out, but largely due to a single outlier
Gaming, stablecoins, and DeSi offered little relief
The clean takeaway is simple: TGE in 2025 was not early.
For most projects, it marked the top.
Lower-FDV launches were the only group with a meaningful survival rate, while higher starting valuations consistently led to deeper repricing.
2025 wasn’t just a bad year for alts.
It was a valuation reset where hype lost to math, and size became a liability.
#USGDPUpdate $AAVE
Waitlist open on Fast Protocol
for early access.
And important part
Fast Protocol NFT mint is live
It’s a Genesis SBT
Free on Ethereum mainnet
Only cost is gas around $0.018
Might be something
Might be nothing
But here’s what Fast is building
Fast Protocol is trying to fix Ethereum UX
Not by changing Ethereum
But by changing how transactions are handled
They use preconfirmations
So when you send a tx, you get a signal in milliseconds
No more guessing
No more waiting
Transactions go through an encrypted mempool
Which reduces frontrunning and MEV abuse
Instead of MEV being extracted
Fast tries to tokenize execution rewards
And distribute them across users and validators
The Genesis SBT just proves you were early
Minting it requires using Fast RPC
And once you do
You start earning Fast Miles from swaps and activity
Built by the Primev team
Backed by a16z CSX, HashKey, Figment
Just Ethereum infrastructure experimenting in public
Free SBT
Cheap gas
Waitlist open on the site
Join their discord incase they have roles now there are around 4k members only
$ETH
for early access.
And important part
Fast Protocol NFT mint is live
It’s a Genesis SBT
Free on Ethereum mainnet
Only cost is gas around $0.018
Might be something
Might be nothing
But here’s what Fast is building
Fast Protocol is trying to fix Ethereum UX
Not by changing Ethereum
But by changing how transactions are handled
They use preconfirmations
So when you send a tx, you get a signal in milliseconds
No more guessing
No more waiting
Transactions go through an encrypted mempool
Which reduces frontrunning and MEV abuse
Instead of MEV being extracted
Fast tries to tokenize execution rewards
And distribute them across users and validators
The Genesis SBT just proves you were early
Minting it requires using Fast RPC
And once you do
You start earning Fast Miles from swaps and activity
Built by the Primev team
Backed by a16z CSX, HashKey, Figment
Just Ethereum infrastructure experimenting in public
Free SBT
Cheap gas
Waitlist open on the site
Join their discord incase they have roles now there are around 4k members only
$ETH
AAVE is entering a governance conflict that has been building for years
Not because the protocol is weak
But because it is stronger than ever
This is not about a hack
It is about control
The protocol today
Aave is the largest lending protocol in crypto
Around $33B in TVL
More than $21B in active borrows
It is now more than twenty times larger than Compound
That scale is what made the dispute unavoidable
The trigger
In early December 2025
CoWSwap was integrated directly into Aave
Swap fees were routed to an Aave Labs wallet
Not to the DAO
That decision exposed a question that had been avoided
Who actually owns AAVE
The unresolved question
One view
The DAO funded everything through the ICO
The brand and revenue should belong to token holders
The other view
Aave Labs legally owns the brand and IP
And has carried development through years of risk
This disagreement existed for a long time
It just was not public
Governance escalation
A proposal emerges to move the brand and IP to the DAO
Another proposal pushes the issue to a Snapshot vote
The conflict becomes explicit
DAO versus Aave Labs
Arguments from one side
• Fees should benefit token holders
• Private control creates conflicts
• DAO sovereignty must be protected
Arguments from the other
• Legal structures are complex
• Snapshot voting is too blunt
• Poor timing risks Aave V4 and adoption
• Labs kept the protocol alive through earlier cycles
Market reaction
During the debate
A large holder exits
About 230000 AAVE
Roughly $38M
The capital rotates into stETH and WBTC
AAVE trades near $151
What happens next?
The Snapshot vote ends December 26
The protocol will survive either outcome
What changes is governance
Whether $AAVE becomes fully DAO controlled
Or continues with hybrid power structures
The open question is not if Aave endures
It is what kind of protocol it becomes after this decision
Not because the protocol is weak
But because it is stronger than ever
This is not about a hack
It is about control
The protocol today
Aave is the largest lending protocol in crypto
Around $33B in TVL
More than $21B in active borrows
It is now more than twenty times larger than Compound
That scale is what made the dispute unavoidable
The trigger
In early December 2025
CoWSwap was integrated directly into Aave
Swap fees were routed to an Aave Labs wallet
Not to the DAO
That decision exposed a question that had been avoided
Who actually owns AAVE
The unresolved question
One view
The DAO funded everything through the ICO
The brand and revenue should belong to token holders
The other view
Aave Labs legally owns the brand and IP
And has carried development through years of risk
This disagreement existed for a long time
It just was not public
Governance escalation
A proposal emerges to move the brand and IP to the DAO
Another proposal pushes the issue to a Snapshot vote
The conflict becomes explicit
DAO versus Aave Labs
Arguments from one side
• Fees should benefit token holders
• Private control creates conflicts
• DAO sovereignty must be protected
Arguments from the other
• Legal structures are complex
• Snapshot voting is too blunt
• Poor timing risks Aave V4 and adoption
• Labs kept the protocol alive through earlier cycles
Market reaction
During the debate
A large holder exits
About 230000 AAVE
Roughly $38M
The capital rotates into stETH and WBTC
AAVE trades near $151
What happens next?
The Snapshot vote ends December 26
The protocol will survive either outcome
What changes is governance
Whether $AAVE becomes fully DAO controlled
Or continues with hybrid power structures
The open question is not if Aave endures
It is what kind of protocol it becomes after this decision
APRO positioning itself as the #1 oracle deserves a closer look, beyond slogans.
At its core, APRO is building an oracle layer optimized for real-time, high-frequency data, not just slow price feeds. This matters because the next wave of onchain activity isn’t simple spot swaps it’s perps, prediction markets, AI-driven apps, and event-based settlement, where stale data can cause liquidations or broken outcomes.
Unlike legacy oracle models that focus mainly on coverage, APRO is leaning into speed, low latency, and multi-chain delivery. Their Oracle 3.0 design combines off-chain computation with on-chain verification, aiming to keep data accurate without bloating costs. Support for both push and pull data feeds makes it flexible for different applications.
That said, “#1” isn’t about claims it’s about dependency. Chainlink still dominates integrations, but APRO is targeting a different battlefield: markets where milliseconds matter.
The real test is adoption. If prediction markets and high-speed DeFi keep growing, oracles like APRO won’t be optional infrastructure they’ll be critical. Whether APRO captures that future will depend on usage, not narratives.$AT @APRO Oracle @APRO-ORACLE #APRO
At its core, APRO is building an oracle layer optimized for real-time, high-frequency data, not just slow price feeds. This matters because the next wave of onchain activity isn’t simple spot swaps it’s perps, prediction markets, AI-driven apps, and event-based settlement, where stale data can cause liquidations or broken outcomes.
Unlike legacy oracle models that focus mainly on coverage, APRO is leaning into speed, low latency, and multi-chain delivery. Their Oracle 3.0 design combines off-chain computation with on-chain verification, aiming to keep data accurate without bloating costs. Support for both push and pull data feeds makes it flexible for different applications.
That said, “#1” isn’t about claims it’s about dependency. Chainlink still dominates integrations, but APRO is targeting a different battlefield: markets where milliseconds matter.
The real test is adoption. If prediction markets and high-speed DeFi keep growing, oracles like APRO won’t be optional infrastructure they’ll be critical. Whether APRO captures that future will depend on usage, not narratives.$AT @APRO Oracle @APRO-ORACLE #APRO
Polymarket moving off Polygon to launch its own L2 is genuinely bullish
This is how L2s should be born
Not random chains searching for users
But apps that grow so large they need their own execution layer
When an application reaches that scale it means real demand real usage and real product market fit
More apps evolving into infrastructure
Less empty chains trying to force ecosystems
#USCryptoStakingTaxReview #TrumpTariffs $BNB
This is how L2s should be born
Not random chains searching for users
But apps that grow so large they need their own execution layer
When an application reaches that scale it means real demand real usage and real product market fit
More apps evolving into infrastructure
Less empty chains trying to force ecosystems
#USCryptoStakingTaxReview #TrumpTariffs $BNB
This really puts 2025 post-TGE performance into perspective.
Around 35 projects launched at valuations above $1B this year.
Not one of them is in the green today.
Average performance
≈ -81%
That’s not a few bad apples
That’s a pattern
We may still see one or two more >$1B launches this year like Lighter or Sentient AGI, but the backdrop hasn’t changed.
It raises an uncomfortable question
Are these launches meaningfully different from memecoin dynamics
Just wrapped in better branding, suits, and narratives
Because even projects launching at $100M
with “strong fundamentals”
are still down 70–80% shortly after listing
This isn’t just poor timing
It’s structural
High FDVs
Low floats
Weak value capture
And a market with no appetite for dilution
No surprise teams are struggling to clear $100M now
And no surprise users are exhausted
2025 wasn’t just a tough year
It was a brutal reality check for altcoins
$AAVE
Around 35 projects launched at valuations above $1B this year.
Not one of them is in the green today.
Average performance
≈ -81%
That’s not a few bad apples
That’s a pattern
We may still see one or two more >$1B launches this year like Lighter or Sentient AGI, but the backdrop hasn’t changed.
It raises an uncomfortable question
Are these launches meaningfully different from memecoin dynamics
Just wrapped in better branding, suits, and narratives
Because even projects launching at $100M
with “strong fundamentals”
are still down 70–80% shortly after listing
This isn’t just poor timing
It’s structural
High FDVs
Low floats
Weak value capture
And a market with no appetite for dilution
No surprise teams are struggling to clear $100M now
And no surprise users are exhausted
2025 wasn’t just a tough year
It was a brutal reality check for altcoins
$AAVE
CT feels stuck.
Same recycled takes. Same screenshots. Same I told you storytelling motivation posts every day
Nothing new gets said. Nothing old gets challenged. Just copy paste loops farming impressions.
No wonder people tune out.
$BTC
Same recycled takes. Same screenshots. Same I told you storytelling motivation posts every day
Nothing new gets said. Nothing old gets challenged. Just copy paste loops farming impressions.
No wonder people tune out.
$BTC
Story of Cupsey From $2000 to $30M on Solana and then the edge disappeared
He started with about $2000
By the end of 2025 the number was above $30M
This is not a claim of inevitability
It is a record of how the trades unfolded
The trader
Cupsey
Age 19
Often described as a trench grinder
The numbers
Records show
• Starting capital around $2000
• Ending net between $30400000 and $30660000
• More than 262000 trades
• Win rate near 67.7 percent
• Over 15500 tokens
• More than $56M in volume
From December 20 2024 to September 15 2025
• 271 green days in a row
• Average daily profit around $113469 during the bull phase
How the strategy worked
This was not long term investing
The approach relied on
• PumpFun snipes
• Small standard entries often near 3 SOL
• Rapid exits
• Scanning hundreds of new launches daily
Holding periods were short
Around 95 percent of trades closed in under one minute
Speed mattered more than conviction
The break
On September 16 activity changed
The main wallet was drained
Nova is suspected as the connection vector
A new wallet appeared
After the drain
From September 16 to December 21
• $145237 realized
• 1248 trades
• About 12.9 trades per day
• Average profit near $1496 per day
The pace slowed
The edge narrowed
The open question
Was the performance driven by execution speed
By early access to flow
By tooling discipline
or by conditions that no longer exist
Cupsey shows what is possible in one market phase
What remains unclear is how repeatable this really is once the environment changes
$SOL
He started with about $2000
By the end of 2025 the number was above $30M
This is not a claim of inevitability
It is a record of how the trades unfolded
The trader
Cupsey
Age 19
Often described as a trench grinder
The numbers
Records show
• Starting capital around $2000
• Ending net between $30400000 and $30660000
• More than 262000 trades
• Win rate near 67.7 percent
• Over 15500 tokens
• More than $56M in volume
From December 20 2024 to September 15 2025
• 271 green days in a row
• Average daily profit around $113469 during the bull phase
How the strategy worked
This was not long term investing
The approach relied on
• PumpFun snipes
• Small standard entries often near 3 SOL
• Rapid exits
• Scanning hundreds of new launches daily
Holding periods were short
Around 95 percent of trades closed in under one minute
Speed mattered more than conviction
The break
On September 16 activity changed
The main wallet was drained
Nova is suspected as the connection vector
A new wallet appeared
After the drain
From September 16 to December 21
• $145237 realized
• 1248 trades
• About 12.9 trades per day
• Average profit near $1496 per day
The pace slowed
The edge narrowed
The open question
Was the performance driven by execution speed
By early access to flow
By tooling discipline
or by conditions that no longer exist
Cupsey shows what is possible in one market phase
What remains unclear is how repeatable this really is once the environment changes
$SOL
Short-term swings don’t matter if your horizon is long enough.
When you zoom out 5, 10, 20, years, crypto trends upward.
If volatility scares you, your timeframe is too short.
Think in years, not days.
$TST
When you zoom out 5, 10, 20, years, crypto trends upward.
If volatility scares you, your timeframe is too short.
Think in years, not days.
$TST
How is anything supposed to look organic anymore
When all we do is yap quack snap or xeet
the same recycled content
every single day
Posting two or three times daily
isn’t organic
And yes
that’s InfoFi
Is InfoFi bad
Not really
It gives people a chance to earn
That part is fine
The problem is how it’s being used now
Every feed looks identical
Every post screams incentives
Endless AI generated copy paste loops
No voice
No thought
No risk
We built this mess ourselves
Projects design campaigns for farming
Communities farm them relentlessly
Then both sides turn around and blame each other
Communities say the project rugged
Projects say the farmers had no loyalty
In the end
both lose credibility
If projects want real users
and communities want real value
We have to bring back authenticity
Because no algorithm can fix
a culture problem
$ETH
When all we do is yap quack snap or xeet
the same recycled content
every single day
Posting two or three times daily
isn’t organic
And yes
that’s InfoFi
Is InfoFi bad
Not really
It gives people a chance to earn
That part is fine
The problem is how it’s being used now
Every feed looks identical
Every post screams incentives
Endless AI generated copy paste loops
No voice
No thought
No risk
We built this mess ourselves
Projects design campaigns for farming
Communities farm them relentlessly
Then both sides turn around and blame each other
Communities say the project rugged
Projects say the farmers had no loyalty
In the end
both lose credibility
If projects want real users
and communities want real value
We have to bring back authenticity
Because no algorithm can fix
a culture problem
$ETH
🚨 Big one coming
$23.6B in Bitcoin options expire next Friday
Calls stacked at $100k and $120k
Puts heavy around $85k
Max pain sitting near $96k
One of the largest $BTC options expiries we’ve seen 👀
$23.6B in Bitcoin options expire next Friday
Calls stacked at $100k and $120k
Puts heavy around $85k
Max pain sitting near $96k
One of the largest $BTC options expiries we’ve seen 👀
နောက်ထပ်အကြောင်းအရာများကို စူးစမ်းလေ့လာရန် အကောင့်ဝင်ပါ