verdejo93

@jack vamos hacer lo mismo que con punch se lo merecen todo los animales.❤️❤️🚀🚀

$XRP Software engineer Vincent Van Code highlighted a post referencing comments from David Schwartz, Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer, addressing a long-standing question within the digital asset space: why large-scale institutional usage has not yet translated into billions of dollars in daily on-chain volume.
The post revisits Schwartz’s response to criticism that, despite more than a decade of development and hundreds of banking relationships, on-chain activity has remained comparatively modest.
The quoted remarks originate from Schwartz’s direct explanation of structural and regulatory constraints that have shaped institutional behavior over time. Rather than disputing the concern, Schwartz acknowledged that adoption has been slow and outlined why.

👉Why Institutions Have Preferred Off-Chain Activity
According to Schwartz, financial institutions have historically favored using digital assets in off-chain environments rather than settling directly on public blockchains. He explained that this preference was driven by compliance, risk management, and control considerations, particularly around counterparty risk and regulatory obligations. In his words, institutions were not opposed to the technology itself but cautious about the environment in which it operated.
Schwartz noted that this posture is beginning to shift. He stated that institutions are increasingly recognizing the operational and economic advantages of moving transactions on-chain, suggesting that the industry is approaching an inflection point. However, he was explicit that progress has been slower than many expected, including those within Ripple itself.
👉Limitations of On-Chain Payments Today
One of the most notable elements of Schwartz’s comments was his admission that even Ripple cannot yet rely on the XRP Ledger’s decentralized exchange for certain payment flows.
He explained that compliance risks remain a barrier, specifically the inability to guarantee that liquidity used in a transaction is not sourced from prohibited actors. This limitation, he said, prevents institutional-scale deployment in its current form.
Schwartz emphasized that this is not a theoretical concern but a practical one that directly affects whether regulated entities can operate on-chain at scale. Until such risks can be mitigated, institutions are unlikely to move high-value settlement activity onto public infrastructure.
👉Permissioned Domains and the Path Forward
Schwartz pointed to permissioned domains as a key development aimed at addressing these issues. He explained that such features would allow institutions to transact on-chain while maintaining necessary controls over counterparties and liquidity sources. In his view, this capability is essential for unlocking sustained, high-volume institutional usage.
Vincent Van Code framed these remarks as a pivotal signal for XRP’s long-term role in global payments. He referenced commentary suggesting that permissioned domains could enable trillions of dollars to move on-chain annually, with XRP positioned to capture a meaningful share of that activity over time.
Van Code characterized the post as essential and expressed confidence in XRP’s trajectory, reinforcing the belief that structural barriers, rather than lack of demand, have been the primary constraint to date.
Taken together, the statements underscore that the absence of massive daily on-chain volume has been due to readiness and regulation, not capability. Schwartz’s comments suggest that the next phase of institutional adoption depends less on partnerships and more on infrastructure that aligns on-chain settlement with regulatory realities.

🚀🚀🚀 FOLLOW BE_MASTER BUY_SMART 💰💰💰
Appreciate the work. 😍 Thank You. 👍 FOLLOW BeMaster BuySmart 🚀 TO FIND OUT MORE $$$$$ 🤩 BE MASTER BUY SMART 💰🤩
🚀🚀🚀 PLEASE CLICK FOLLOW BE MASTER BUY SMART - Thank You.