Final Post
Most DeFi vaults make you choose.
Ethereum or Berachain.
One chain.
One reward stream.
One protocol at a time.
@Bedrock approached the uniBTC vault design for $BR and the wider
#Bedrock community differently. Instead of forcing capital to pick a chain, the vault maintained an Ethereum-side position and represented it simultaneously on
#Berachain , pulling reward streams from both blockchains at once. This is the
#BTCFi architecture the Boyco campaign results put on record.
Here is what running inside that structure looked like in practice.
On the Ethereum side, the same deposit ran these reward streams at once.
🔵 3x Bedrock Diamonds
🔵 2x CIAN Points
🔵 Babylon Points
🔵 FBTC Sparks
🔵 Partner protocol rewards
On the Berachain side, the same capital generated independently in parallel.
🟡 Native BERA tokens
🟡 Kodiak bonuses
🟡 Dolomite bonuses
🟡 Goldilocks bonuses
🟡 BeraBorrow bonuses
The vault did not split deposits between chains or force a trade-off. One receipt token, yluniBTC.bera, preserved the Ethereum position while the Berachain side accumulated separately.
Four yield layers ran concurrently.
🟣 Berachain native rewards
🟣 Bera DeFi protocol allocations across four partner protocols
🟣 CIAN yield stack incentives including Bedrock Diamonds, Babylon Points, and additional DeFi rewards
🟣 CIAN point accruals as a fourth independent stream on top
Each layer drew from a different source without competing with the others. The structure was not additive in the traditional sense. It was parallel. Each stream ran independently, which is what made the count reach 10-plus without any single reward cannibalizing another.
The two-week Boyco campaign closed at $86.57M TVL with 8.99% APY and 75 million Diamonds distributed across participants.
10-plus streams. 10-plus protocols. Two blockchains. One deposit action.
What the design leaves open is whether reward density at this level holds when ecosystem bootstrapping incentives cycle out and only the underlying cross-chain yield mechanics carry the weight.
$H $BEAT