$BTC and $XPL continue to plummet, which can be entirely attributed to liquidity issues within the cryptocurrency circle and the ongoing impact of the 1011 incident. When to buy the dip? Look at the BTC monthly line; action can only be taken below 60,000. When can the value VC coin led by the token xpl of the project #Plasma be bought at a low? The TVL of plasma has reached 3.5 billion, and its market value has dropped below 1 billion, making it completely worthwhile for investment. However, it is also necessary to wait until BTC stabilizes before buying the dip; future returns should be higher than BTC. @Plasma
The Mouthful Event: Creators' Essays Become a Feast for Big Influencers
Taking the #Plasma event as an example, the top three big influencers scored over 400 points, while the bottom three only scored 90 points.
Everyone can open the articles about @Plasma posted by these big influencers. Besides having high traffic, there are hardly any comments or likes, and the content is almost all AI-generated. However, they can add four or five dozen or even a hundred points in a day.
They rely on having many fans and streaming to gain benefits, I have no objections, because before the plasma event, the top 500 can still get a little soup. But for other events, only the top 100 have rewards. If you score 10 points in a day, a big influencer can score four or five dozen or even over a hundred, while ordinary people can't even get a sip of soup.
In January, a total of 6 airdrops were received, but the profit can't compare to one $XPL ! The total value of 6 airdrops is $335, with a net profit of $230. A total of 9 were received in the competition, with an average profit per individual not exceeding $3. Messing around and mistakes resulted in a loss of $400, leading to a loss in January. Thinking back to September last year, one xpl was over 250u, those good days will never return. At that time it was a bull market, with xpl's listing perfectly timed and the background project team plasma doing a great job, along with generous new offerings, multiple factors contributed to a market cap reaching 16 billion at launch. Now, looking at the financing close to $200 million for zama, the market cap is only $400 million.
Still, @Plasma plasma is impressive, when will the next #Plasma appear?
Why have BTC and XPL fallen continuously? Where is the bottom?
This article uses mainstream coin BTC and VC coin XPL (plasma) as examples, with concise content and fewer words for ease of reading. 1). Key knowledge points, the three factors that determine coin prices: External liquidity Coin prices are linked to the US dollar, and the speed of US dollar printing, interest rate hikes, and cuts will determine the extent of US dollar proliferation. Internal liquidity The coin forms a positive cycle of price increase, with strong bullish sentiment and ample internal liquidity. In a bear market, internal liquidity is scarce. Consensus value The bear market bottom for coin prices is continuously rising, and the consensus is getting stronger. 2). The market environment has led to a sharp decline in coin prices: The United States is in a rate-cutting cycle, and current external liquidity is ample, but it is not flowing into cryptocurrencies.
Personally tested, it's best to use the Plasma network for withdrawals
1). One of the fastest among all withdrawal networks 2). One of the cheapest among all withdrawal networks 3). All exchanges support #Plasma network, whereas certain exchanges like BSC network do not support it. 4). Address EVM compatible, no need to use messy recharge addresses like APT, SOL, SUI, etc.
Plasma network, as an early Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, is designed to alleviate the burden on the mainnet through 'sub-chains.' It demonstrates unique architectural advantages in terms of deposits and withdrawals:
1. Deposit: Efficient and low-cost access Low transaction friction: Users only need to initiate a deposit transaction once on the Ethereum main chain to lock assets in the Plasma smart contract. Once on the sub-chain, all subsequent transactions are processed off-chain.
Yesterday, the international gold and silver markets experienced an epic 'plunge', with gold recording its largest single-day drop in nearly 40 years, while silver set a record for the largest intraday drop in history.$XAG
Here are several key reasons that triggered this gold and silver crash: 1. The Fed nominee triggers a 'hawkish turn' This is the most direct catalyst for the crash. U.S. President Trump nominated **Kevin Warsh** to be the next Chairman of the Federal Reserve. Warsh is historically known for his 'hawkish' stance, advocating for a reduction of the Fed's balance sheet and opposing overly loose monetary policy. This news shattered the market's original expectations for continued rate cuts in the future, leading to:
$ZAMA 0.048 smooth hedging, 0.049 has been hanging for a few days without success 🥹🥹. Cost about 147, locked in profit 135. That's fine, don't be greedy. Why not hang above 0.05? Because there is an 8% pressure from new shares, it's hard to go up there.
It's comfortable, what a big deal! 🥹🥹🥹 It seems that only about seven or eight thousand people are participating in the competition.. The MGO with fewer spots is surprisingly high The esports with more spots is surprisingly low In the end, only those seven or eight thousand people are left 💩💩💩 $ESPORTS $CLO
Last night, I originally intended to precisely bottom out XAG, planning to place a 100U long order and add to my position every time it dropped by 1U. Instead, I mistakenly placed an order for 100XAG and instantly lost 100U 😭😭😭. If only I had honestly analyzed $XPL , how great would that be? XPL, as the token of the public chain #plasma , is there a possibility of issuing RWA assets backed by physical silver and gold in plasma, forming a competitive relationship with $XAG and $XAU ?
@Plasma Plasma, as a high-performance Layer 1 blockchain, provides instant, low-fee, or even zero-fee transactions. Its EVM compatibility and massive stablecoin liquidity make it an ideal infrastructure for the tokenization of RWA (real-world assets), supporting seamless on-chain trading and settlement of assets like stocks, government bonds, and gold, accelerating the integration of traditional finance and DeFi.
$XAU $XAG Phased bottom-fishing, clearly a short-term oversell. The environment for the dollar has not changed significantly; the decline is still due to having risen too much. Every time XAG drops by 10 dollars, take a position.
$ESPORTS Although the competition has ended, let's not create anxiety with figures like 80,000 or 90,000. If it exceeds 80,000, I will live stream eating 💩. Today's transaction volume is only 546 million, which is much less than the expected 600 million in the afternoon. 546 million divided by 6900 equals 79,000. Usually, it won't reach 79,000 because the number of participants is more than 6900. This can at least get an 80% discount. The likely cutoff amount: 79,000 * 0.8 is around 63,000. I only swiped 80,000.
Last year, a friend from the United States transferred $5,200 to me, and the service fee alone took $200, so I actually received $5,000.
I have to say that the service fees for cross-border remittances are really high.
I hope #Plasma can be widely adopted soon, as it not only allows for real-time transfers but also almost without any loss, making it incredibly convenient.
@Plasma reduces the cost of a single remittance to below $0.01 through off-chain calculations and data compression, much lower than the traditional bank's 6% rate.
Core advantages:
Fast settlement, achieving second-level arrival using sidechain architecture;
High throughput, able to support small payments on a global scale;
Stablecoin integration, avoiding exchange rate losses. By 2026, it has become a technological tool to bypass the high relay fees of SWIFT and achieve 'zero-cost' cross-border transfers. $XPL
The cost of cross-border remittances reaches 6%, can plasma solve this problem?
Entering 2026, cross-border remittances remain a 'high premium' pain point in global finance. Although the digitalization process is accelerating, the cost structure remains complex.
1. Current in-depth analysis of remittance costs According to the latest monitoring data from the World Bank for early 2025 and 2026, the global average remittance cost still hovers around 6%, far exceeding the 3% target set by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). 1. Composition of costs: Where is the 'money going'? Remittance costs are not a single fee, but rather an aggregation from multiple dimensions:
$ESPORTS $CLO Done, the transaction volume should be over 600 million. Estimated quota: 600 million divided by 6900*0.8=70,000 There are many slots, and the number of people stealing may be higher, plus the wear and tear is high, so I think it might be lower than 70,000. I brushed 80,000, which is a must-entry amount. CLO does not want to participate, too tiring.
Damn, BTC plummeted, feeling frustrated, sent an $88 red envelope, hope you can be happy.🥰🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁 "BTC tanked again, feeling super down… Sending you an $88 red envelope, go treat yourself and feel better!" 🎁🎁
Does Plasma, designed solely for stablecoins, limit its development?
Core viewpoint: Vertically deepening rather than being functionally limited In the blockchain industry, 'general-purpose' public chains (such as Ethereum, Solana) and 'application-specific' public chains (such as @Plasma Plasma) represent two different evolutionary logics. #Plasma It is not that a single choice was made due to an inability to support other functions, but rather a strategic trade-off was made between execution efficiency and application scenarios. 1. The 'dimensionality reduction' brought by deep optimization General public chains need to balance multiple demands such as DeFi, NFT, gaming, and social interactions simultaneously, which means their underlying architecture must accommodate various complex smart contract logic, inevitably resulting in 'performance redundancy.'
$XPL In order to complete the transaction task of the #Plasma creator activity, I will brush a trading volume of 1000u of the xpl contract, opening a position that has already cost me over ten dollars, and the position is still hanging. In the afternoon, the newly released 500u task for USD1, I accidentally sold short with leverage of 60,000 dollars, hurriedly closing the position and losing 120u in fees. Mid-month, TIMI was squeezed by 200u💩💩💩💩💩 At this time, the only way to fill the losses is to rely on the best public chain, Plasma airdrop. @Plasma The most distinctive feature of the Plasma public chain is that it is the world's first Layer 1 blockchain specifically designed for stablecoins, rather than a general-purpose public chain. It adopts PlasmaBFT consensus (derived from Fast HotStuff optimization), achieving thousands of TPS with high throughput and quick confirmations under 12 seconds, while providing the core feature of zero transaction fees for USDT transfers, significantly reducing the daily payment costs for stablecoins.
$ZAMA The new subscription is about to end, estimated at around 230,000, with a profit around 80u calculated at a price of 0.4. I don't recommend hedging anymore. Because the public offering a while ago caused prices to keep falling, the current FDV is only 440 million, and the financing amount is 130 million. Based on financing, it feels like the valuation given at this stage after listing is too low.
$OWL $MGO $ESPORTS Carefully look at the new version of the competition, the minimum qualifying amount refreshes once an hour, the goal is to let you roll out that 💩, currently applied in the owl competition. The last day of the owl competition will definitely take off, anyway think about whether to join the competition in the last hour or two, for now, just keep refreshing regularly, don't deliberately try to roll 💩💩