Taimoor_sial

Walrus lies a carefully designed assignment algorithm that determines how data shards are distributed across storage nodes. This algorithm is not a simple placement rule; it is a core mechanism that balances decentralization, efficiency, security, and long-term data availability in an open, adversarial environment.
Walrus operates in epochs, fixed periods during which staking, voting, and storage responsibilities are determined. At the beginning of each epoch, the network evaluates the current set of storage nodes, their relative stake, and the overall storage demand. The assignment algorithm then maps data shards to nodes in a way that reflects each node’s proportional responsibility in the system. This stake-aware approach ensures that nodes committing more resources to the network also carry an appropriate share of storage duties.
key design goal of the assignment algorithm is stability. Frequent reshuffling of shards would introduce unnecessary data movement, increasing bandwidth costs and operational risk. To avoid this, Walrus introduces a cutoff point in the assignment process. Once this cutoff is reached, shard allocations are finalized for the epoch, and only the minimum required migrations are allowed. This means that even if stake changes slightly, the system prioritizes keeping shards where they are, unless a significant imbalance must be corrected.
Another important aspect is migration minimization. When shard migration is unavoidable—such as when a node’s relative stake drops or rises sharply—the algorithm carefully selects which shards should move and to where. The objective is to rebalance storage while touching as little data as possible. This design choice directly improves network performance and reduces the attack surface during transitions between epochs.
The assignment algorithm also plays a critical role in security and fault tolerance. By distributing shards based on stake rather than static capacity claims, Walrus prevents malicious nodes from overcommitting storage they cannot reliably maintain. If a node fails to cooperate during migration or recovery, the protocol can trigger penalties, including slashing, ensuring that dishonest behavior is economically discouraged.
Importantly, the algorithm is designed for an open network. Walrus does not assume that all nodes will behave honestly. Instead, it anticipates partial failures and adversarial strategies, embedding recovery pathways directly into the assignment logic. Cooperative nodes are rewarded with smooth transitions and stable assignments, while uncooperative ones face clear economic consequences.
Walrus assignment algorithm is the invisible coordinator that keeps the storage network balanced. It aligns incentives, limits unnecessary data movement, and ensures that storage responsibility evolves predictably over time. By combining epoch-based decisions, stake-aware allocation, and migration control, Walrus achieves a rare balance: a decentralized storage system that is both efficient and resilient at scale.
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus

At the foundation of every secure blockchain lies a set of cryptographic guarantees that ensure data cannot be altered, forged, or misrepresented. One of the most critical of these guarantees is collision resistance—a property that plays a central role in how the Dusk Network preserves data integrity while operating at scale.
Collision resistance refers to the difficulty of finding two distinct inputs that produce the same cryptographic hash. In practical terms, this means it should be computationally infeasible for an attacker to manipulate transaction data, account states, or proofs in a way that results in identical cryptographic fingerprints. For a privacy-focused blockchain like Dusk, this property is not optional—it is essential.
Dusk is designed to support confidential transactions, zero-knowledge proofs, and regulated financial use cases simultaneously. These features rely heavily on cryptographic commitments and hashes to represent private data without revealing it publicly. If collisions were easy to produce, an attacker could exploit this weakness to substitute valid data with malicious alternatives, undermining trust in the system. Collision resistance ensures that every commitment, proof, and state transition on Dusk uniquely represents its underlying data.
Within the Dusk Network protocol, collision-resistant hash functions are used across multiple layers. They secure transaction identifiers, bind commitments to hidden values, and anchor Merkle tree structures that summarize large sets of data efficiently. By relying on strong collision resistance, Dusk ensures that even when transaction details remain private, the network can still verify correctness and consistency without ambiguity.
This becomes especially important as the network scales. Dusk is built to handle complex financial workflows such as security token issuance, lifecycle management, dividend distribution, and compliance checks. These processes generate large volumes of cryptographic data that must remain verifiable over long periods of time. Collision resistance guarantees that historical records cannot be subtly altered or replaced, preserving auditability and long-term integrity.
Collision resistance also strengthens Dusk’s zero-knowledge infrastructure. Zero-knowledge proofs depend on cryptographic hashes to bind statements to proofs securely. If two different statements could produce the same hash, proof validity would lose its meaning. By enforcing collision-resistant primitives, Dusk ensures that proofs attest to exactly one valid statement—no more, no less.
From a security perspective, collision resistance contributes directly to network trust. Validators, applications, and institutions interacting with Dusk can rely on the fact that cryptographic references are stable and unforgeable. This trust is critical for regulated environments, where legal and financial accountability depends on immutable records.
Ultimately, collision resistance is one of the silent safeguards that enables Dusk to deliver privacy without sacrificing reliability. It allows the network to hide sensitive data while still maintaining strong guarantees about correctness, uniqueness, and integrity. As Dusk continues to scale toward real-world financial adoption, collision resistance remains a cornerstone of its cryptographic architecture—quietly protecting every transaction, proof, and state transition behind the scenes.
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk

The purpose of both Stablecoins (ones that preserve value and provide liquidity) and Money Market Funds (MMFs) (money that also preserves value and provides liquidity) is to provide an equivalent form of prescriptive funds; however, they are different types of funds, originating from different markets. MMFs are established as a result of regulated securities activity and stablecoins are derived from a blockchain environment. As can be discerned through the viewpoint of the Plasma, there are certain similarities and differences between these two types of funds. Both funds will ultimately define how infrastructure and programmatic regulations will define how Digital Currency continues to evolve in future periods.
Converging Functions, Different Origins
Institutions and investors have considered Money Market Funds to be low-risk ways of getting liquid exposure to cash-like investments that have been available for many years. Regulators have created regulatory frameworks with very specific rules regarding the quality of assets, the amount of liquidity required to be held in the funds, how information is disclosed about the funds and how operationally strong the funds must be. Stablecoins are new products that provide similar functions on a global basis and can help with payments, settlement, treasury management and transferring value across borders. As more people use these products, regulators are beginning to see these products as a type of financial product instead of an experimental crypto product.
Regulation Is Catching Up—Infrastructure Must Too
Established frameworks for regulated transactions govern money market funds, whereas there is an evolving set of global frameworks to govern the activities of stablecoins. More clarity is emerging regarding reserves and the quality thereof; rights to redeem and how they relate to reserves; the level of transparency required regarding reserve assets and their liquidity; and requirements for risk management. However, Plasma believes that regulatory oversight is only one part of the equation. Even when there is regulatory oversight, there must also be sufficient-level infrastructure in place that will enable stablecoins to deliver predictable results concerning execution time, settlement speed, and operational resilience. Otherwise, there will be no means for reliably enforcing the protections offered by regulations.
Settlement Is the Key Difference
While MMFs typically use traditional money wiring systems and know what hours operations will take place, stablecoins settle directly on the blockchain and thus allow instantaneous transactions on the blockchain around the world. This presents an opportunity and a challenge. Therefore, settlement on the blockchain must be proven to be reliable; able to track transactions; and be able to handle high volumes without clogging the network. Plasma has been designed to solve this problem by focusing on deterministic execution and stablecoins-first settlement. Consequently, redemptions, transfers, and big flows will all act the same even when the network is busy.
Transparency, Privacy, and Institutional Needs
Periodic reporting and auditing are the primary sources of transparency for money market funds (MMFs), whereas stablecoins (e.g., USDC) offer a new kind of continuous on-chain transparency. However, Plasma is aware of the challenges of having complete transparency because this would cause financial institutions to disclose certain types of sensitive financial activity. Plasma's method for having a private settlement is that the private data will be protected while simultaneously maintaining verifiably correct results. As institutional stablecoin adoption becomes closer to reality, and with greater regulatory scrutiny, having a way to balance both of these elements will become much more important.
Infrastructure as the Bridge Between Models
In the view of Plasma, future opportunities will primarily be based on what can happen as you align stablecoins up with financial expectations, not by simply replacing MMFs with stablecoins. Further, as the lines of oversight begin to blur together, and both blockchain-based asset and traditional financial product infrastructure start to intersect with each other, Plasma establishes itself as a neutral /institution to provide a stablecoin-ready /compliant infrastructure to operate on for what would be the level of reliability, predictability and overall compliance compatibility typical of what we think of today with modern finance.
The functions between Stablecoins & Money Market Funds are converging, although they will remain structurally distinct. Regulations will help define the rules but, ultimately, the infrastructure will define if the rules will be effective in real-world environments. Plasma will act as the settlement & execution infrastructure that enables stablecoins to evolve into trusted/credible financial instruments by aligning the efficiencies of Blockchain with the discipline of traditional Money Markets.
@Plasma $XPL #Plasma

Vanar usability, scalability, and security were the main priorities in its design. Low-cost blockchains face a major challenge with spam and block saturation attacks such as when an attacker sends a huge number of transactions to create congestion in the blocks, reducing their performance. To counter this problem, Vanar has implemented a fixed fee and tiered pricing system that were carefully designed based upon extensive testing.
The Problem with Ultra-Low Variable Fees
The fluctuating fees on several blockchains due to user demands or the low fee structure implemented by various blockchains in order to promote users provide an opportunity for the malicious person to attack the network. By submitting a large number of transactions that cost little to submit (high gas fee) are able to fill a block before the legitimate customers have had their transactions processed. This results in network congestion, failure to process the customers' transactions, and consequently potential denial of service..
Vanar Fixed Fee Approach
Vanar has made change by providing fixed transaction fees in USD opposed to conventionally utilizing Gas Token Market/automated market pricing. Doing this allows for consistent and predictable transaction costs for customers while eliminating the unpredictability that is often exploited by violent offenses. In addition, even when Gas Token prices fluctuate widely, Vanar will still charge the same fee for a transaction according to the actual resources used to complete your transaction.
Tiered Fees Based on Gas Consumption
One of the main ways Vanar is able to secure their platform is by using a tiered fee structure – i.e., transaction fees increase with the gas consumption of the transaction. Thus, lightweight transactions such as simple transfers are cheap and affordable to execute; however, high-gas transactions will require larger transaction fees to execute. Therefore, it would be cost-prohibitive for attackers to perform large-scale spam attacks on Vanar’s network, since the price of consuming block-space grows proportionately larger for every unit consumed.
Preventing Block Saturation
Vanar intends to deter deliberately attempting to fill a block by setting high fees for gas-sucking transactions. When someone tries to submit thousands of massive transactions at once (or whenever they do), it becomes increasingly expensive for them to keep submitting. Therefore, the fixed cost of filling up all the space in a block protects legitimate parties who want to use the resources in a block.
Balancing Accessibility and Security
The everyday users as well as the developers will not face any charges. Everyday users and developers can carry out small/medium transactions without incurring any high costs, thus promoting a great amount of activity on the network (mass adoption) and frequency of use cases. The network is protected from harm by aligning transaction fee structure to actual usage of network's resources.
A Sustainable Defense Mechanism
Rather than reacting to security issues with a patch, Vanar's modular fee structure serves as an economic deterrent to bad behaviour within the network. The result is that Vanar discourages malicious activity from damaging its long-term reliability by making it cost-effective to behave well. Furthermore, Vanar provides consistent throughput for all legitimate users, which allows them to reliably perform at a consistent level, regardless of the demand on the system.
By using fixed fee structures and gas-based tiers as transactional fees, Vanar utilizes transaction pricing to provide security from network spam and saturation attacks, while also being economical, predictable, and scalable. In developing these fee structures, Vanar has produced a blockchain network for real-world/high-volume applications.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #vanar

Built for settings where disruptions, delays, or supply chain issues happen every day, the Walrus Architecture is being delivered through our Asynchronous Challenge Protocol (ACP). This unique protocol will provide an entirely new way to verify whether or no data can be accessed from the systems on which it resides.
Core Problem in Decentralized Storage
Decentralized storage technologies typically utilize synchronous challenge mechanisms. These technologies require an attempted proof that nodes store the required data within defined timeframes. Although this works well theoretically, in practice it will often lead to failure.
Walrus Architectural Shift
Walrus takes a structural approach to storage rather than a timing one. Instead of requesting responses from all of the nodes at once, Walrus is focused on whether there are enough correct data fragments existing throughout the network. This change eliminates the use of time for security and substitutes it with cryptographic and structural guarantees instead.
Asynchronous Challenge Protocol Explained
Walrus introduced an asynchronous challenge protocol where challenges are issued and storage nodes will provide their responses independently and at their own time. There must be a sufficient collection of valid proofs for the network to accommodate data verification. There is no penalty for late but correct responses, and there is no advantage for faster but still valid responses.
Why Asynchrony Matters
The fact that real networks cannot be predicted accurately and can thus deliver messages late, drop connections, or experience other types of high-volume traffic cannot be avoided. Walrus acknowledges the reality of a currently operating network by developing a secure protocol where secure delivery of we can be assured regardless of whether communication was received out of sequence or was delayed. This will assure the security guarantees are applicable under actual network environments as opposed to only tested on an idealized basis.
Security Without Heavy Overhead
Traditional storage methods will typically use heavy amounts of replication or continual validation in order to make up for the lack of verification. Walrus is able to avoid this by allowing the use of strong verification through an asynchronous challenge protocol which does not require the network to be in constant synchronization or have excessive duplication of storage. Security is built into the design instead of being achieved through brute force.
Impact on Network Reliability
As a result of its non-dependence on full participation, the protocol maintains operation through periods of limited failure. The protocol also prevents malicious nodes from taking advantage of time gaps; and as such has improved network stability, fairness and resiliency by increasing node reliability.
A New Standard for Decentralized Storage
Not only does Walrus optimize old concepts, it also establishes a new standard for the way that decentralized storage systems reason about trust and availability. By decoupling correctness from timing, Walrus demonstrates that it is possible to build an efficient and realistic decentralized storage system.
The Walrus Asynchronous Challenge Protocol (WACP) is an innovative milestone for the development of decentralised storage systems . WACP does not require confirmation through synchronised verification and instead focuses on network behaviour observed in practice , making it possible for the future deployment of extensive , secure and fully decentralised storage systems .
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus

Stability of Assets (Stablecoins) is shifting in the world of Crypto to Real-world Payment needs (Fiat), so now privacy will be needed as a must and not a nice luxury. Companies, Institutions and everyday users want to ensure that sensitive information (payment amount, who you are paying, movement of funds) remains private, and not available as public records. The Plasma method of creating Private Secured Payments is to protect your sensitive data while not compromising correctness, speed or compliance.
Privacy Without Sacrificing Settlement Integrity
Many privacy-protecting systems give up transparency for secrecy, which creates problems when users want to verify transactions or use them in regulated environments. Plasma does not have this type of tradeoff. Plasma does not hide the validity of the transaction; plasma maintains the confidentiality of the data layer but provides a way for users to validate the final settlement. Transaction validation, ordering and completion happens deterministically, despite there being some fields defined as sensitive. Therefore, there is no decrease in the level of trust in the system because of privacy.
System-Level Design, Not an Add-On
The Plasma implementation views privacy as part of the complete system rather than being treated as an additional feature after the core system architecture is established. In relation to privacy, it has focused on confidentiality relative to consensus, execution, and gas economics. Plasma also has ensured that the methods used to preserve privacy are designed in such a way that shows that the behavior of confidential transactions will be consistent when heavily loaded, which is important in terms of providing stable settlement through the use of stablecoins since uncertainty and delays can lead to a lack of confidence in high volume periods.
Confidentiality Aligned With Stablecoin Use Cases
Stablecoins are commonly utilized for various purposes that demand discretion when it comes to the transactions, such as making payments or performing treasury operations, processing payroll, or settling payments across national borders. Plasma provides privacy-preserving settlement capabilities for stablecoins to help facilitate these transactions by minimizing the disclosure of unnecessary data and enabling transactions to be executed smoothly. As a result, businesses can move capital without having to disclose strategic information, counterparties can settle without having to publicly disclose the nature of their relationship with each other, and users can transact without their financial activity becoming publicly available.
Performance and Determinism at Scale
Privacy most times introduces an overhead in computation, reducing throughput whilst increasing costs. Plasma is focused on delivering deterministic performance, to eliminate or greatly reduce the execution time of privacy-preserving transactions, as well as quickly (efficiently) finalising those transactions, thus, they will not create any bottleneck or uncertainty around fees. This allows for the ability for confidential settlement to scale with public settlement, rather, it will be used only in niche use cases or low volumes.
Compliance-Compatible Privacy
Plasma understands that privacy and compliance are not opposites. Instead of providing total anonymity, Plasma is built around being able to provide selective disclosure and confidentiality that will meet many regulations at the same time. Applications based on Plasma can comply with the rules that require disclosure when necessary—but they also provide users with protection from public exposure unnecessarily. Privacy is used to create value, where appropriate, and not where it creates a systematic threat.
A Foundation for Institutional Adoption
Institutions must have privacy-preserving settlement for their transactions to keep their trading strategies, liquidity positions, and business relationships out in the open and exposed to the market. Plasma allows institutions to settle without compromising their ability to protect confidential financial information while still maintaining the ability to be auditable and reliable in a completely confidential way.
With its pragmatic, infrastructure-driven approach to maintaining the privacy of transactions using confidential settlement techniques, such as designing a system with confidentiality built-in from the ground up while providing deterministic execution and rapid finality, as well as compliance, Plasma provides the foundation for stablecoins to act as true financial instruments; providing a bridge between the transparency of blockchain technology with the privacy expectations of today’s capital markets, creating a reliable, confidential way of executing settlements.
@Plasma $XPL #Plasma

A security-oriented approach governs the blockchain platform, where any new innovations that are introduced into the platform must first undergo extensive testing. Auditing at the protocol level is a key component to the architecture of Vanar's protocol, making sure that all changes to the protocol will improve and not diminish the Blockchain network.
Why Protocol Audits Matter
Consensus, transaction processing methods, transaction fees, and the behavior of validators on the Network may be impacted by protocol-level changes. Even minor modifications can create systemic changes. Vanar considers such upgrades to have a high degree of risk by default even before they are implemented and typically expose upgrades to substantial levels of review in order to eliminate security issues, economic exploits, or actions not intended by the design.
Independent Third-Party Audits
To make use of an independent review of the proposed protocol changes from top level experts in the area of Smart Contract and Protocol Security, Vanar contracts with reputable Blockchain Security Auditors. By enlisting third party professionals in the field, the company obtains an added layer of assurance to their own internal engineering reviews.
Deep Technical Analysis
Auditors do full:-checks of an application.
Validation for code correctness and logic.Threat models & Analysis of attack vectors.Consensus review of the economic safety of the contracts.
Low probability of edge cases and failure modes occurring with our changes to contract.
All our tests ensure that our changes will withstand both real-world and adversarial environments.
Audit as a Mandatory Checkpoint
External Validation serves as a necessary reference point in the Vanar Development Lifecycle and Protocol updates will only move forward after auditing has confirmed that they have met strict security criteria to minimise potential risk of introducing any vulnerabilities in Production.
Transparency and Accountability
By relying on independent audits, Vanar promotes transparency and accountability. Decisions are validated by trusted experts, reinforcing confidence among developers, enterprises, validators, and users.
Enterprise-Grade Reliability
Brands and large apps that have strict and secure infrastructures need disciplined audits as part of their app development process. The way Vanar enhances its network to meet production standards is critical for those organizations.
Security Without Compromise
Rigorous audits of protocols give Vanar the ability to create new solutions with confidence. Combining internal and external testing by subject matter experts ensures each upgrade to the network will improve it and create a strong, secure blockchain now while ensuring its continued robustness into the future.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #vanar

Dusk does not utilize generic blockchains, instead focusing on a carefully chosen set of building blocks to allow for compliant, privacy preserving and high performance financial applications.....Dusk is an architected blockchain built from scratch with the goal of implementing real world financial infrastructure. Every component supports the overall architecture of the blockchain and is built specifically for its assigned job on the blockchain.
Privacy as a Core Architectural Principle
The Dusk Network's primary and essential feature is Privacy. While the sender, recipient, and amount transferred in every transaction are kept private by default and are not recorded publicly on-chain. Privacy is accomplished through native zero-knowledge proof primitives that are integrated into the protocol itself.
The primary concern with respect to Privacy on Dusk is that it provides a selective rather than total trade off - The Dusk Network has a functionality of ‘Selective Disclosure’, whereby when information is to be validated by an Authorised Third Party (for example, a Regulator or Auditor), the chosen information can be validated without having to disclose that information publicly, thereby allowing Dusk to meet regulatory obligations and account for User Confidentiality.

2 . The DUSK Native Asset
DUSK serves as a base unit of value and provides many uses beyond just simple value exchange. It provides both the exclusive economic asset of the network as well as providing security to the network. In addition to being used for staking and paying transaction fees, it is also used in the consensus mechanism of the network and creates the proper alignment between network security and economic incentives.
With one single and privileged asset, Dusk prevents fragmented security frameworks and provides a clean and auditable economic system. This helps Dusk create strong Sybil resistance and guarantees the long-term viability of Dusk's ecosystem as a result.

3 . Consensus and Network Security
A consensus mechanism is an essential part of Dusk. Dusk’s consensus mechanism is a privacy-preserving proof-of-stake mechanism with cryptographic leader selection - rather than public visibility. The block proposal process has a unique set of rules that allows for the generation of blocks without exposing the names of proposed block generators, thereby protecting them against targeted attacks, censorship, and front-running.
The DUSK tokens are staked by those that participate in the consensus to guarantee security for the network using committee based agreement to allow finality (settlement) to happen quickly with solid Byzantine fault tolerance. Therefore, the network will be able to support the requirements needed by financial-grade applications.

4 . Smart Contracts and the Rusk Virtual Machine
The Rusk VM (Rusk Virtual Machine) is responsible for executing smart contracts on Dusk and was created especially to enable zero-knowledge proof-based verification and allow developers to create applications that can validate intricate conditions without disclosing any of the underlying data.
Rusk is quite different from conventional virtual machines because it creates a direct integration between cryptographic verification and execution logic. As a result of this direct integration, private DeFi, compliant asset issuance and secrecy in financial workflows can all be maintained in a deterministic and secure manner while achieving full usage efficiency.

5 . Transaction Model and State Management
Dusk operates a privacy-preserving transaction model which allows for accurate balance accounting without the use of the public ledger. The transfer of assets remains in a pending state until the recipient expressly accepts it; thereby avoiding any premature changes in balances and guaranteeing accuracy of those balances.
The state transitions that occur through Dusk's protocol-level contracts are tightly regulated, thereby minimising systemic risks and allowing for simplified verification. The structure of these transactions increases their auditability while maintaining confidentiality.

6 . Compliance by Design
The fact that Dusk has a foundation built on its compliance-aware architecture is one of its most important and distinguishing features; Dusk was designed to be able to work with many regulatory frameworks – for example, when it comes to security token issuance, lifecycle management, and institutional reporting responsibilities.
Dusk, through use of selective disclosure and cryptographic attestations, can allow for compliance in a manner that does not compromise either decentralization or privacy; therefore, it has an almost exclusive capability to connect traditional financial institutions and the blockchain.

7 . Interoperability and Extensibility
The Dusk Network is designed for interoperability with other blockchain ecosystems. By utilizing trusted or trust-minimized interoperability solutions, Dusk can act as a privacy-preserving sidechain or execution layer for existing Layer-1 networks.
The extensibility of the Dusk Network allows for a large variety of applications to be hosted on the network, while still maintaining its primary focus of confidential, compliant finance.

The components that form the Dusk Network are not simply a collection of distinct features but rather they work together as part of a unified structure to create a complete solution. All the elements (privacy, consensus, smart contracts, compliance, and incentivisation) have been interwoven into one cohesive purpose-built system.
Through creating these components in a native form rather than as a type of extension or add-on, Dusk has created a Blockchain platform designed to support the 'real money' Financial Markets in a secure and private manner at scale.
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk

Vanar has created their own monetary structure called “VANRY” which they consider to be the basis of their Ecological system built to provide economic stability for all participants within the Ecological system through providing clear direction for how to use various aspects of the Ecological system (i.e., Security, Governance, etc.). The VANRY Monetary Structure consists of tokens that were created specifically and intentionally to capture value from all transactions that occur on the Vanar Network. By creating an engineered model for the tokens that is designed for broad adoption (mass) and enterprise-quality (large businesses).
VANRY as the Native Gas Token
The native utility token in the Vanar blockchain (as is the case for utilities on Ethereum, or "ETH") is VANRY. Each transaction, each execution of a smart contract, and any operation performed on the Vanar blockchain will require the user to pay gas fees using VANRY. In addition, the use of a single gas token will provide a more simplified developer and user experience and more consistent and predictable behavior of the Vanar network.
Vanar's transaction fee model is based on VANRY; therefore Vanar allows you to execute transactions at very low costs yet still provide high transaction security and throughput. This structure allows for consumer and high volume worldwide businesses to use VANAR.

A Transparent and Limited Minting Design
The VANRY minting protocol is strictly limited and follows an official, predictable, and transparent framework. There are two restricted methods for creating tokens; thus, the supply will be very controlled. Because of this disciplined process, developers, validators, and long-term holders of tokens will all have confidence in the consistency of their ecosystem, as they will know exactly how many tokens will be created.

Genesis Block Allocation
When Vanar launches its blockchain, an initial amount of tokens (VANRY) are generated at the start of the blockchain (genesis block) and provide necessary liquidity for activating the network, processing transactions, and allowing early participants in the ecosystem to use it.
Vanar is also a step away from the current Virtua ecosystem. To ensure a smooth and fair transition to the new token system, Vanar will allow existing TVK holders to swap their tokens for VANRY at a ratio of 1:1. Since there will be a total of 1.2 billion TVK tokens, Vanar will also create 1.2 billion VANRY tokens to give current holders the ability to transition to the new token system without losing value or continuity with the original token system.

Block Rewards and Ongoing Token Issuance
The issuance of the additional VANRY Tokens occurs solely via block rewards and is done in a manner to ensure only that new tokens enter use when there is new block creation and/or validation on the VANRY Network.
The total number of VANRY tokens is limited to 2.4 billion tokens (fixed and transparent monetary base), providing a long-term limited supply of VANRY tokens but also enough incentive for Validators and other Ecosystem Participants to engage.

Long-Term Emission Curve (20-Year Horizon)
VANRY token has a defined IEO/ICO timetable that will take about twenty years to complete. Tokens will be dispersed gradually over time, instead of rapidly or in large amounts to aid in the long-term growth and maturation of the VANAR network.
The distribution of tokens will occur evenly across all blocks generated over time by the VANAR network, with each block being produced in a set time frame (three seconds). This structure minimizes the effects of sudden inflation upon the entire network as well as providing predictable rewards, allowing for a secure and economically balanced network for many years.

Validator Incentives and Network Security
Validators are key to ensuring Vanar's ongoing security and operational integrity. Validator participation is encouraged through VANRY block reward payments that serve as the primary incentive for them to act with integrity by keeping node uptime, and validating transactions correctly.
In addition, by tying Validator payments to long-term emitting models, and not short-term payouts, Vanar has helped to align the interests of Validators and to maintain a robust, stable, and resilient Validator ecosystem that is necessary for continued decentralization and confidence in Vanar.

Economic Sustainability and Ecosystem Alignment
VANRY creates a common alignment of all stakeholders involved:
Users benefit with fee predictabilityDevelopers can develop scalable applications at a predictable costValidators receive equitable and sustainable long-term rewardsGovernance & stake allows the community to be included in the network
This creating an alignment of VANRY as both a transactional and long-term strategic economic instrument, which enables growth of the network without losing the ability to function in a stable manner.

VANRY Token is not just a means of payment; VANRY Token is the core economic design of Vanar Blockchain. VANRY has a fixed supply, does controlled minting, has a long-term emission curve and will provide an easy way to transition to a new token. This gives VANRY an economically fair, transparent and sustainable token economy. With this type of design, VANAR has created a Blockchain that can perform today and continue to produce secure, scalable, and community driven growth for decades into the future.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #vanar