曼迪mandy
主业是撸毛，偶尔玩合约，从未爆过仓。大钱没赚过，小钱凭运气。如果你也玩币圈，我们就是好朋友。
22 Following
14.7K+ Followers
6.6K+ Liked
637 Shared
All
Quotes
Live
PINNED
See original
Binance Square's Creator Task Platform is about to undergo significant adjustments!
The previous methods of relying on AI to generate content in bulk and crazy quantity are completely useless now. The newly launched #GAIB project @GAIB AI is being treated as a "pilot pioneer," clearly establishing "quality + views" as the sole evaluation standard, indicating the future direction of the entire square.
The current major pain points of Binance Square (which everyone agrees on):
1. Ranking fluctuations are extremely unstable: it's not a cumulative points system; today you might be in the top ten, but tomorrow you could drop off the chart, with the algorithm logic completely unclear.
2. Too friendly towards new users: older authors find it increasingly difficult to rank over time, seriously undermining the motivation of long-term creators.
3. Severe content homogenization: over 90% is AI-generated text, lacking personal viewpoints, focusing solely on quantity rather than quality.
4. Chinese creators are severely marginalized: the rankings are almost entirely dominated by the English-speaking region, with almost no visibility for Chinese content.
Because of these issues, the officials are taking decisive action this time, directly targeting the #GAIB project to strongly promote high-quality Chinese content.
GAIB project core rules breakdown (focus here):
1. Accounts must have ≥90% of content in Chinese, this time it's a clear benefit for Chinese creators!
2. Final rewards only consider "views + quality":
From all eligible Chinese posts, select the top 50 with the best comprehensive performance in terms of views and quality (each with ≥300 characters) to share the prize pool.
→ Translation: Brothers still using AI-generated content, it's time to stop!
→ You must write with profound insights, valuable content, personal viewpoints, and discussion-provoking content like top accounts on X (Twitter) to have a chance.
3. The officials explicitly encourage the "combination of images and text" in creative forms → Adding images = significant bonus points, not adding images is a big loss.
This is the first time Binance Square has truly prioritized "quality" and the first time it has genuinely brought Chinese creators back to the main stage.
Whoever adapts to the new rules the fastest will reap the biggest rewards.
Brothers still piling up AI-generated text, it's really time to wake up.
Start practicing writing now: write like you're tweeting, short and impactful, with viewpoints, valuable content, images, and the ability to attract traffic.
The sooner you transform, the sooner you take off!
The GAIB event has already begun, hurry up! Those who get on the bus first always earn the most.
@GAIB AI #GAIB
The previous methods of relying on AI to generate content in bulk and crazy quantity are completely useless now. The newly launched #GAIB project @GAIB AI is being treated as a "pilot pioneer," clearly establishing "quality + views" as the sole evaluation standard, indicating the future direction of the entire square.
The current major pain points of Binance Square (which everyone agrees on):
1. Ranking fluctuations are extremely unstable: it's not a cumulative points system; today you might be in the top ten, but tomorrow you could drop off the chart, with the algorithm logic completely unclear.
2. Too friendly towards new users: older authors find it increasingly difficult to rank over time, seriously undermining the motivation of long-term creators.
3. Severe content homogenization: over 90% is AI-generated text, lacking personal viewpoints, focusing solely on quantity rather than quality.
4. Chinese creators are severely marginalized: the rankings are almost entirely dominated by the English-speaking region, with almost no visibility for Chinese content.
Because of these issues, the officials are taking decisive action this time, directly targeting the #GAIB project to strongly promote high-quality Chinese content.
GAIB project core rules breakdown (focus here):
1. Accounts must have ≥90% of content in Chinese, this time it's a clear benefit for Chinese creators!
2. Final rewards only consider "views + quality":
From all eligible Chinese posts, select the top 50 with the best comprehensive performance in terms of views and quality (each with ≥300 characters) to share the prize pool.
→ Translation: Brothers still using AI-generated content, it's time to stop!
→ You must write with profound insights, valuable content, personal viewpoints, and discussion-provoking content like top accounts on X (Twitter) to have a chance.
3. The officials explicitly encourage the "combination of images and text" in creative forms → Adding images = significant bonus points, not adding images is a big loss.
This is the first time Binance Square has truly prioritized "quality" and the first time it has genuinely brought Chinese creators back to the main stage.
Whoever adapts to the new rules the fastest will reap the biggest rewards.
Brothers still piling up AI-generated text, it's really time to wake up.
Start practicing writing now: write like you're tweeting, short and impactful, with viewpoints, valuable content, images, and the ability to attract traffic.
The sooner you transform, the sooner you take off!
The GAIB event has already begun, hurry up! Those who get on the bus first always earn the most.
@GAIB AI #GAIB
PINNED
See original
Unlocking Future Wealth: Discussing How GAIB Achieves Sustainable Income and Cutting-Edge Technology Dividends Through Staking sAID
In investing, it is often difficult to achieve high returns, low risk, and good liquidity simultaneously. However, staking sAID is breaking this dilemma, satisfying both needs. It opens a new door to sustainable income for investors through a clever mechanism.
This 'key' can unlock the following threefold benefits:
1. Stable Interest: Pledged 'Basic Salary'
When you stake AID tokens into sAID, it's like depositing money into a super bank. This bank will reward you for maintaining network security, bringing you a continuous flow of passive income, akin to interest. This is the most stable cornerstone of your earnings.
This 'key' can unlock the following threefold benefits:
1. Stable Interest: Pledged 'Basic Salary'
When you stake AID tokens into sAID, it's like depositing money into a super bank. This bank will reward you for maintaining network security, bringing you a continuous flow of passive income, akin to interest. This is the most stable cornerstone of your earnings.
See original
Injective: A Chain-Based Financial Infrastructure That Becomes More Professional
Speaking of Injective, this chain has always been positioned quite steadily, without those flashy plot lines, nor does it engage in sensationalist narratives. It is more of a project that is very 'determined'—locking onto one thing and then doing it deeply over the long term. Injective's insistence on the financial direction is the core reason it has been able to continuously expand its ecosystem and attract financial teams over the years.
The underlying structure of Injective is very engineer-minded; it does not pander to the general user, nor does it pursue the fantasy of 'everything can be built on my chain.' Instead, it directly focuses on trading, settlement, risk control, and cross-chain asset capabilities, which are the foundational abilities closest to a real financial system. This kind of underlying optimization is hard to see in the short term, but for teams working on trading protocols, the value is very practical.
The underlying structure of Injective is very engineer-minded; it does not pander to the general user, nor does it pursue the fantasy of 'everything can be built on my chain.' Instead, it directly focuses on trading, settlement, risk control, and cross-chain asset capabilities, which are the foundational abilities closest to a real financial system. This kind of underlying optimization is hard to see in the short term, but for teams working on trading protocols, the value is very practical.
See original
Injective: A Public Chain That Makes "On-Chain Finance" Most Like Finance
Continue to look deeper into Injective, and you will find that its approach is very "engineer-like"; it's not the kind of new narrative that comes from a whim, but a genuine inquiry into the underlying structure: if the chain is truly to support large-scale financial transactions, what should it actually look like?
The answer given by Injective is to break down complex financial logic at the modular level, deeply optimizing each component as needed, and then combining them to serve upper-level protocols. This direction may not sound flashy, but the actual implementation is very challenging; this is precisely why it will not compete in the same arena with a bunch of "generic L1s" for bandwidth and TPS, but will instead run as an independent financial infrastructure line.
The answer given by Injective is to break down complex financial logic at the modular level, deeply optimizing each component as needed, and then combining them to serve upper-level protocols. This direction may not sound flashy, but the actual implementation is very challenging; this is precisely why it will not compete in the same arena with a bunch of "generic L1s" for bandwidth and TPS, but will instead run as an independent financial infrastructure line.
See original
Injective: A Modular Financial Public Chain That Becomes More 'Hardcore' as It Advances
To be honest, after this round, there aren't many public chains that can make their narrative clearer and their ecosystem more solid; Injective is one of the more stable ones. It does not rely on slogans, but rather walks the path of 'financial chain' with increasing specialization and verticality, even forming its own independent set of gameplay.
Injective's core point, in fact, has always remained the same: it builds the underlying structure into a 'financially optimized' framework, not pursuing a large and comprehensive universal VM, but instead using a modular approach to refine the parts most related to finance, such as transactions, order books, auctions, oracles, and cross-chain communication to perfection. In other words, it is not competing with L1 in comprehensive capabilities, but instead transforming itself into a 'specialized track chain' that serves financial protocols.
Injective's core point, in fact, has always remained the same: it builds the underlying structure into a 'financially optimized' framework, not pursuing a large and comprehensive universal VM, but instead using a modular approach to refine the parts most related to finance, such as transactions, order books, auctions, oracles, and cross-chain communication to perfection. In other words, it is not competing with L1 in comprehensive capabilities, but instead transforming itself into a 'specialized track chain' that serves financial protocols.
See original
China's new standard, young people: ages 18 to 65, this is what makes us work like cattle and horses for a lifetime.
See original
9 o'clock airdrop, raid old coins, worth about 30u! This is almost a clear sign.
See original
Someone just asked me if there are any airdrops today? As of now, there are no airdrop announcements for today and the next few days! In this situation, at most there will be a surprise with an old coin.
See original
The Hidden Giant: Managing Nearly $600 Million in Assets Quietly On-Chain
In the world of cryptocurrency, while chasing one hot topic after another, people can easily overlook the projects that are truly building foundational value. They do not create noisy marketing or participate in daily topical debates; they simply address a core issue quietly: how to manage the massive influx of funds into blockchain in a professional, efficient, and transparent manner? The Lorenzo Protocol is exactly such a project. It does not define itself as another DEX or lending market, but rather positions itself as the 'asset management layer' of the entire on-chain finance. This is a more fundamental track that also requires more patience.
See original
Breaking Technical Barriers: When Injective Opens the Door for Millions of Developers
In the world of blockchain, the barriers between ecosystems have often felt like invisible walls, making it difficult for developers to make choices. Deeply engaging in one ecosystem often means accepting its specific language, tools, and rules, leading to high migration costs and slowing down the pace of innovation. People have begun to long for a 'multi-chain future,' but the fragmented experience remains a lingering pain. Recently, a key upgrade completed by Injective may be attempting to break down this wall by opening a familiar door for the world's largest developer community—Ethereum developers.
See original
Scarcity Engine: When Network Activity Becomes the Fuel for Minting Scarcity
In the world of encrypted assets, the game of 'inflation' and 'deflation' has always been at the core of value narratives. Many projects relied on token issuance in the early stages to incentivize the ecosystem, but when market sentiment shifts, the newly added circulation often becomes a burden that prices cannot bear. Therefore, a model that can intrinsically convert ecological growth into token scarcity has become a precious characteristic in the eyes of many investors that transcends cycles. Injective is attempting to build such a precise 'scarcity engine' through its continuously evolving token economics, especially with the INJ 3.0 upgrade.
See original
Financial Frontiers: When On-Chain Contracts Touch the 'Forbidden Zone' of Traditional Finance
In the world of decentralized finance, innovation seems to never stop, but at times it can also fall into a certain cycle. For a while, the fiercest competition among various derivatives trading platforms has often revolved around contracts for Bitcoin or Ethereum. When growth hits a ceiling, homogeneous competition becomes inevitable. However, some explorers have begun to set their sights further afield, toward the vast ocean of traditional finance worth hundreds of trillions of dollars beyond the high walls of blockchain. The latest developments in the Injective ecosystem are precisely this kind of cutting-edge experiment that crosses boundaries, attempting to extend the tentacles of on-chain contracts into a previously unreachable domain—equity in Pre-IPO companies.
See original
Compliance Pioneers: Actively Illuminating Beacons in the Fog of Rules
In the long dialogue between the crypto world and the global regulatory system, tension and uncertainty are often the main themes. Many projects choose to wait and see or avoid, viewing compliance as a passive response challenge. However, there are also some builders who have taken a different approach: they proactively step forward, attempting to clarify a path forward for themselves and the entire industry amidst the fog of rules. Injective and its team, Injective Labs, are such pioneers.
In 2025, as regulatory scrutiny increasingly focuses on the decentralized finance sector, Injective Labs made a symbolic move. They proactively submitted formal comment letters to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) twice, in July and October. This was not a defense against any specific enforcement action but a forward-looking, principle-based communication. In the letter, their core argument was that truly decentralized, non-custodial DeFi lending protocols that require over-collateralization should be clearly defined as 'automated loan systems' and should not fall under the regulatory framework of securities law. They also called for a clear regulatory safe harbor exemption for neutral user interaction frontends, such as wallets and blockchain explorers.
In 2025, as regulatory scrutiny increasingly focuses on the decentralized finance sector, Injective Labs made a symbolic move. They proactively submitted formal comment letters to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) twice, in July and October. This was not a defense against any specific enforcement action but a forward-looking, principle-based communication. In the letter, their core argument was that truly decentralized, non-custodial DeFi lending protocols that require over-collateralization should be clearly defined as 'automated loan systems' and should not fall under the regulatory framework of securities law. They also called for a clear regulatory safe harbor exemption for neutral user interaction frontends, such as wallets and blockchain explorers.
See original
Builder's Lego: When Modular Vaults Become Building Blocks of Financial Innovation
In the world of blockchain, we often hear the term 'ecosystem', which depicts a prosperous picture of numerous applications connecting and growing together. However, building such prosperity is not an easy task. For many developers or teams with innovative ideas, starting from scratch to build a product that can handle complex financial logic and is safe and reliable requires overcoming very high technical barriers and capital costs. This is precisely why many potential innovations stop at the conceptual stage. Protocols like Lorenzo Protocol may have deep value in that they attempt to fundamentally reduce the difficulty of this construction through a clever 'Lego-like' design, thus stimulating the creativity of the entire ecosystem.
See original
Builder's Paradise: When Financial Innovation Becomes as Simple as Assembling LEGO
In the world of blockchain, a good idea often faces a massive technological gap from inception to realization. Once upon a time, building a fully functional decentralized finance application was akin to starting from steelmaking to personally crafting an entire car. Just creating an on-chain order book capable of withstanding MEV attacks could consume several months of a development team's effort, causing many innovative sparks to dim in the face of such high costs and complexities. However, this situation is being changed by Injective. What it is doing is providing a 'toolbox' filled with standardized advanced components for all builders with dreams of financial innovation, bringing Web3 development from the era of 'handcrafted workshops' into a new stage of 'industrial production'.
See original
Will Binance Alpha airdrops continue?
Sister's latest interpretation of Dubai's original words
I went through all the interviews, roundtables, and dinner speeches of Sister during the Dubai Blockchain Week again, answering the remaining 240,000 active Alpha personnel:
1. Will Alpha completely end?
Sister's original words:
"In the end, I just want to try."
"To survive, one can only keep moving forward, without overly longing for past models."
Conclusion: Alpha will not die, but will undergo major version iterations.
2. Can we return to the crazy market of hundreds of U per day like in September?
Sister's original words:
"The pond has gotten bigger, and the fish have also gotten bigger."
Conclusion: It's completely impossible to go back.
The era of small ponds is over. Now it's the ocean + sharks, and the information gap and pure score grinding can no longer get any meat.
3. How will Alpha change in the future?
Sister gave these several clear signal core keywords:
bibi + 1 (she mentioned this repeatedly but didn't elaborate, the community speculates it's fan economy + multi-layered commission)
The gameplay shifts from "daily score grinding" to "fan economy + multi-layered commission"
In the future, more real scenarios where "users are willing to pay" will be added
Long-term contributions, on-chain identity, and social activity will carry more weight
In short: it will upgrade from a short-term get-rich-quick game to a sustainable fan ecosystem. What should ordinary people do now?
4. How should we respond to changes in the future?
1. The era of multiple accounts grabbing airdrops has completely ended, so shut down all the small accounts
2. There is a high probability of deep integration with Binance Square, starting the commission return model, so everyone should hurry to develop Binance Square
3. Long-term holding will be encouraged
4. The weight of new listings may significantly increase, so keep some BNB on hand
The Alpha of September is already dead, and Alpha 2.0 is quietly hatching.
After the above interpretation, I plan to keep my account and close all the small accounts, then focus on developing Binance Square.
Sister's latest interpretation of Dubai's original words
I went through all the interviews, roundtables, and dinner speeches of Sister during the Dubai Blockchain Week again, answering the remaining 240,000 active Alpha personnel:
1. Will Alpha completely end?
Sister's original words:
"In the end, I just want to try."
"To survive, one can only keep moving forward, without overly longing for past models."
Conclusion: Alpha will not die, but will undergo major version iterations.
2. Can we return to the crazy market of hundreds of U per day like in September?
Sister's original words:
"The pond has gotten bigger, and the fish have also gotten bigger."
Conclusion: It's completely impossible to go back.
The era of small ponds is over. Now it's the ocean + sharks, and the information gap and pure score grinding can no longer get any meat.
3. How will Alpha change in the future?
Sister gave these several clear signal core keywords:
bibi + 1 (she mentioned this repeatedly but didn't elaborate, the community speculates it's fan economy + multi-layered commission)
The gameplay shifts from "daily score grinding" to "fan economy + multi-layered commission"
In the future, more real scenarios where "users are willing to pay" will be added
Long-term contributions, on-chain identity, and social activity will carry more weight
In short: it will upgrade from a short-term get-rich-quick game to a sustainable fan ecosystem. What should ordinary people do now?
4. How should we respond to changes in the future?
1. The era of multiple accounts grabbing airdrops has completely ended, so shut down all the small accounts
2. There is a high probability of deep integration with Binance Square, starting the commission return model, so everyone should hurry to develop Binance Square
3. Long-term holding will be encouraged
4. The weight of new listings may significantly increase, so keep some BNB on hand
The Alpha of September is already dead, and Alpha 2.0 is quietly hatching.
After the above interpretation, I plan to keep my account and close all the small accounts, then focus on developing Binance Square.
See original
Today, a netizen on Xiaohongshu exposed that the Zhejiang Financial Assets Exchange has collapsed! Many people have invested their retirement savings into it, and they have lost everything; it really hurts to see this!
Personal opinion: Currently, all investments are unstable; only gold retains its value! "Buy gold in chaotic times." If anyone has a channel, let's make a move!
Personal opinion: Currently, all investments are unstable; only gold retains its value! "Buy gold in chaotic times." If anyone has a channel, let's make a move!
See original
In the middle of the night, $MOODENG inserted a needle, I shorted it, and Binance actually liquidated my position, causing me to miss out on three to four dozen points. Customer service explained: triggered ADL automatic reduction. Has anyone encountered this situation? I also can't understand their explanation.
See original
Injective: A chain that is becoming increasingly 'real'
Continuing to look deeper into Injective, you will find that its growth is not the kind that relies on short-term hype, but rather it has gradually sharpened the financial attributes of the chain to the extreme. In fact, the entire industry is now talking about 'real demand, real transactions, real profits', and the ecological development path of this chain aligns perfectly with this trend.
It has a characteristic that the more you explore, the more you can see its 'financial genes'. For example, its insistence on the on-chain order book is not just about pursuing performance, but treating the order book as the core capability of the chain. In the professional trading field, the order book represents a more precise, controllable, and verifiable way of price formation. Many people think that on-chain order books are ordinary, but there are actually very few chains that can achieve stability and usability in terms of latency, throughput, matching, and liquidity management. Injective is one of the few that can truly run.
It has a characteristic that the more you explore, the more you can see its 'financial genes'. For example, its insistence on the on-chain order book is not just about pursuing performance, but treating the order book as the core capability of the chain. In the professional trading field, the order book represents a more precise, controllable, and verifiable way of price formation. Many people think that on-chain order books are ordinary, but there are actually very few chains that can achieve stability and usability in terms of latency, throughput, matching, and liquidity management. Injective is one of the few that can truly run.
See original
The Real Face of Injective: The More Research, The More Solid Financial Public Chain
Continue reading about Injective, and I increasingly feel that it is the kind of chain that 'slowly expands its pattern.' It does not rely on shouting new narratives but steadily promotes every feasible point. This approach may not seem as attractive during a bear market, but it is the kind that can reap the greatest benefits in a bull market.
Injective's initial positioning was as a high-performance financial infrastructure, so you will find that its ecosystem has never been a chaotic pile of everything but is clearly visible: it is built around core financial scenarios such as trading, derivatives, asset issuance, liquidity, and cross-chain. Moreover, it has gradually formed a style of 'chain-level order book + modular derivatives framework.'
Injective's initial positioning was as a high-performance financial infrastructure, so you will find that its ecosystem has never been a chaotic pile of everything but is clearly visible: it is built around core financial scenarios such as trading, derivatives, asset issuance, liquidity, and cross-chain. Moreover, it has gradually formed a style of 'chain-level order book + modular derivatives framework.'
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number
Trending Topics
BTCVSGOLD
7.9M views
58,135 Discussing
$BEAT $MDT $GLMR
GOLD’S BIGGEST PROBLEM IS FINALLY EXPOSED
At a recent event in Dubai, Peter Schiff held up a gold bar… and admitted he couldn’t even confirm it was real.
That’s the issue:
To fully verify gold, you need a fire assay — melt the bar and destroy the asset.
Meanwhile, Bitcoin verifies itself instantly.
No labs. No experts. No middlemen.
Just math and a public ledger anyone can audit 24/7.
And with an estimated 5–10% of global gold supply counterfeit, the trust model is breaking.
Gold = “trust the system.”
Bitcoin = “verify for yourself.”
Physical assets that can’t prove authenticity are losing monetary premium to digital assets that prove themselves every 10 minutes.
The real question isn’t “Is Bitcoin money?”
It’s: “Was gold ever truly verifiable?”
Institutions are already rotating.
#CPIWatch #BTCVSGOLD #TrumpTariffs #BinanceBlockchainWeek #USJobsData
Almedina4
23 Likes
14.7k views
BinanceBlockchainWeek
30M views
96,252 Discussing
CPIWatch
42.8M views
160,219 Discussing
