Binance Square

TeaHouse

1 Following
27 Followers
27 Liked
1 Shared
All Content
--
See original
Contract short-term trend data: 24h generated trend trading pairs 404, of which long positions 255 (63.12%), short positions 149 (36.88%). Contract medium-term trend data: 24h generated trend trading pairs 358, of which long positions 341 (95.25%), short positions 17 (4.75%). The medium and short-term trend seems to have stabilized. {future}(ETHUSDT)
Contract short-term trend data: 24h generated trend trading pairs 404, of which long positions 255 (63.12%), short positions 149 (36.88%).
Contract medium-term trend data: 24h generated trend trading pairs 358, of which long positions 341 (95.25%), short positions 17 (4.75%).
The medium and short-term trend seems to have stabilized.
--
Bullish
See original
Contract short-term trend data: 24h generated trend pairs 432, of which bullish 402 (93.06%), bearish 30 (6.94%). Contract medium-term trend data: 24h generated trend pairs 251, of which bullish 222 (88.45%), bearish 29 (11.55%). {future}(ETHUSDT)
Contract short-term trend data: 24h generated trend pairs 432, of which bullish 402 (93.06%), bearish 30 (6.94%).
Contract medium-term trend data: 24h generated trend pairs 251, of which bullish 222 (88.45%), bearish 29 (11.55%).
--
Bullish
See original
Contract short-term trend data: 24h produced 429 trending pairs, of which 348 are long (81.12%), and 81 are short (18.88%). Contract medium-term trend data: 24h produced 179 trending pairs, of which 146 are long (81.56%), and 33 are short (18.44%). {future}(ETHUSDT)
Contract short-term trend data: 24h produced 429 trending pairs, of which 348 are long (81.12%), and 81 are short (18.88%).
Contract medium-term trend data: 24h produced 179 trending pairs, of which 146 are long (81.56%), and 33 are short (18.44%).
See original
Contract short-term trend data: 24h generated trend trading pairs 420, among which long positions 275 (65.48%), short positions 145 (34.52%). Contract mid-term trend data: 24h generated trend trading pairs 153, among which long positions 117 (76.47%), short positions 36 (23.53%). ETH suddenly came in just at the right moment. {future}(ETHUSDT)
Contract short-term trend data: 24h generated trend trading pairs 420, among which long positions 275 (65.48%), short positions 145 (34.52%).
Contract mid-term trend data: 24h generated trend trading pairs 153, among which long positions 117 (76.47%), short positions 36 (23.53%).
ETH suddenly came in just at the right moment.
See original
Contract short-term trend data: 24h generated trend pairs 422, of which long positions 218 (51.66%), short positions 204 (48.34%). Contract medium-term trend data: 24h generated trend pairs 136, of which long positions 102 (75.00%), short positions 34 (25.00%). Continue to wait, is it a long period of sideways movement or the beginning of the next medium-short trend? {future}(ETHUSDT)
Contract short-term trend data: 24h generated trend pairs 422, of which long positions 218 (51.66%), short positions 204 (48.34%).
Contract medium-term trend data: 24h generated trend pairs 136, of which long positions 102 (75.00%), short positions 34 (25.00%).
Continue to wait, is it a long period of sideways movement or the beginning of the next medium-short trend?
See original
Contract short-term trend data: 24h generated trend currency pairs 428, among which long positions 156 (36.45%), short positions 272 (63.55%). Contract medium-term trend data: 24h generated trend currency pairs 110, among which long positions 76 (69.09%), short positions 34 (30.91%). Currently in the final stage of the 4th retracement, most currency pairs' medium-term trends remain uncertain, continuing to wait for a decisive reversal in the medium-term trend. {future}(BTCUSDT) {future}(ETHUSDT)
Contract short-term trend data: 24h generated trend currency pairs 428, among which long positions 156 (36.45%), short positions 272 (63.55%).
Contract medium-term trend data: 24h generated trend currency pairs 110, among which long positions 76 (69.09%), short positions 34 (30.91%).
Currently in the final stage of the 4th retracement, most currency pairs' medium-term trends remain uncertain, continuing to wait for a decisive reversal in the medium-term trend.

See original
Contract short-term trend data: 24h generated trend currency pairs 424, of which 200 are long (47.17%), 224 are short (52.83%). Contract medium-term trend data: 24h generated trend currency pairs 84, of which 47 are long (55.95%), 37 are short (44.05%). Compared to the previous hour, the long and short trends have switched back and forth, and are not clear, proceed with caution. {future}(ETHUSDT)
Contract short-term trend data: 24h generated trend currency pairs 424, of which 200 are long (47.17%), 224 are short (52.83%).
Contract medium-term trend data: 24h generated trend currency pairs 84, of which 47 are long (55.95%), 37 are short (44.05%).
Compared to the previous hour, the long and short trends have switched back and forth, and are not clear, proceed with caution.
See original
Contract short-term trend data: 24h generated trend currency pairs 423, of which long positions 260 (61.47%), short positions 163 (38.53%). Contract medium-term trend data: 24h generated trend currency pairs 80, of which long positions 43 (53.75%), short positions 37 (46.25%). {future}(1INCHUSDT)
Contract short-term trend data: 24h generated trend currency pairs 423, of which long positions 260 (61.47%), short positions 163 (38.53%).
Contract medium-term trend data: 24h generated trend currency pairs 80, of which long positions 43 (53.75%), short positions 37 (46.25%).
See original
24h Ultra Short Trend At 21:00, there are a total of 204 trading pairs, at 22:00 there are 268 pairs, with the bearish trend accounting for 88.81%. Most are small pullbacks during the process of convergence of moving averages (mainstream coins such as $BTC $ETH $SOL are continuously consolidating). The exception trading pairs are as follows: {future}(HOMEUSDT) {future}(AIXBTUSDT)
24h Ultra Short Trend At 21:00, there are a total of 204 trading pairs, at 22:00 there are 268 pairs, with the bearish trend accounting for 88.81%. Most are small pullbacks during the process of convergence of moving averages (mainstream coins such as $BTC $ETH $SOL are continuously consolidating). The exception trading pairs are as follows:
See original
Contract short-term trend data: 79 trend currency pairs generated in the last 24 hours, of which 30 are bullish (37.97%) and 49 are bearish (62.03%). After a small pullback yesterday, ETH is currently in a consolidation phase. Although the trend data is gradually turning bullish, the movements are scattered, and there is no clear direction; it is best to wait. {future}(ETHUSDT)
Contract short-term trend data: 79 trend currency pairs generated in the last 24 hours, of which 30 are bullish (37.97%) and 49 are bearish (62.03%).
After a small pullback yesterday, ETH is currently in a consolidation phase. Although the trend data is gradually turning bullish, the movements are scattered, and there is no clear direction; it is best to wait.
See original
Contract short-term trend data: 126 trend currency pairs generated in 24 hours, of which 26 are bullish (20.63%), 100 are bearish (79.37%). {future}(ETHUSDT)
Contract short-term trend data: 126 trend currency pairs generated in 24 hours, of which 26 are bullish (20.63%), 100 are bearish (79.37%).
See original
The 'impossible triangle' of Web3 token economics: Reflections based on CreatorBidIntroduction In the previous article, I mistakenly presented personal reflections as investment advice. I clarify here: this article is merely an analysis of current issues and does not constitute any investment recommendations. The topic of today's discussion arises from reflections prompted by the CreatorBid project and its token $BID . The BID token has been rising consistently, and upon deeper examination, it is driven by a Dynamic Incentive Mechanism (DIM). Details about DIM can be researched independently; I am more concerned about its market effects: while the token circulation is locked, does this exacerbate price volatility?

The 'impossible triangle' of Web3 token economics: Reflections based on CreatorBid

Introduction
In the previous article, I mistakenly presented personal reflections as investment advice. I clarify here: this article is merely an analysis of current issues and does not constitute any investment recommendations.
The topic of today's discussion arises from reflections prompted by the CreatorBid project and its token $BID . The BID token has been rising consistently, and upon deeper examination, it is driven by a Dynamic Incentive Mechanism (DIM). Details about DIM can be researched independently; I am more concerned about its market effects: while the token circulation is locked, does this exacerbate price volatility?
See original
Analysis of RVN Project Value and LimitationsReal-world asset tokenization (RWA) is seen as the next wave, from real estate to art, equity to wine futures, tokenization promises to bring traditional assets into a decentralized digital world. Ravencoin (RVN) focuses on providing a low-cost, simplified platform for asset tokenization. This article will analyze RVN's value and limitations from the perspectives of technology, market, competition, and economic model, exploring its positioning in the wave of asset tokenization. Key technical features of Ravencoin include: Proof of Work (PoW) and KAWPOW algorithm: RVN uses the ASIC-resistant KAWPOW algorithm, encouraging ordinary users to mine with GPUs to prevent hash power centralization and maintain decentralization. As of June 2025, RVN's network hash rate is approximately 4.76 TH/s, supported by global miners.

Analysis of RVN Project Value and Limitations

Real-world asset tokenization (RWA) is seen as the next wave, from real estate to art, equity to wine futures, tokenization promises to bring traditional assets into a decentralized digital world. Ravencoin (RVN) focuses on providing a low-cost, simplified platform for asset tokenization. This article will analyze RVN's value and limitations from the perspectives of technology, market, competition, and economic model, exploring its positioning in the wave of asset tokenization.
Key technical features of Ravencoin include:
Proof of Work (PoW) and KAWPOW algorithm: RVN uses the ASIC-resistant KAWPOW algorithm, encouraging ordinary users to mine with GPUs to prevent hash power centralization and maintain decentralization. As of June 2025, RVN's network hash rate is approximately 4.76 TH/s, supported by global miners.
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number

Latest News

--
View More

Trending Articles

King_Junaid1
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs