Calix Rei

Kiedy po raz pierwszy natknąłem się na Fabric Foundation i pomysł stojący za Fabric Protocol, moją pierwszą reakcją był sceptycyzm. Po spędzeniu lat w branży kryptowalut nauczyłem się, że rynek ma tendencję do odkrywania nowej narracji co kilka miesięcy, przypisując do niej token, a następnie obserwując, jak oś czasu wypełnia się pewnymi prognozami, zanim technologia udowodni, że może naprawdę działać. Narracje AI, narracje agentów, narracje robotyki — wszystkie one pojawiły się w falach. Więc kiedy zobaczyłem protokół, który twierdził, że chce zbudować infrastrukturę dla robotów i agentów maszynowych, aby uczestniczyły w otwartych systemach ekonomicznych, moim instynktem było wstrzymać się, a nie od razu dać się ponieść ekscytacji.

My Deep Research Into the Vision and Infrastructure of the Fabric Foundation
Over the past few months, I’ve been spending a lot of time exploring the intersection of artificial intelligence, robotics, and decentralized infrastructure. One idea that keeps appearing in discussions across both the AI and crypto communities is something often described as the “robot economy.” At first, the phrase sounds futuristic, almost speculative. But the deeper I looked into the current state of robotics and automation, the more I realized that this shift is already beginning. Robots are no longer confined to research labs or experimental factories—they are increasingly present in logistics warehouses, hospitals, agricultural fields, and even service industries. What struck me during my research, however, is that while machines are becoming capable of performing economic work, our global infrastructure still treats them as tools rather than participants in the economy. This is exactly where the vision of the Fabric Foundation becomes fascinating.
The central idea behind Fabric is surprisingly simple but incredibly ambitious: build the economic and coordination layer that allows intelligent machines to interact with humans and with each other in an open, decentralized system. In other words, Fabric is attempting to create a digital infrastructure where robots and AI agents can have identities, perform tasks, verify work, and receive payments. When I first encountered this concept, it reminded me of the early days of blockchain networks like Ethereum, which introduced programmable infrastructure for decentralized applications. Fabric is essentially applying a similar logic, but instead of focusing purely on software applications, it is looking at physical machines operating in the real world.
One of the most important insights that came out of my research is that robotics is approaching a massive inflection point. Advances in AI—especially machine learning models capable of interpreting physical environments—are dramatically increasing what robots can do. At the same time, hardware costs are steadily declining, making robotic deployment economically viable for many industries. Global demographics also play a role here. Many developed economies are experiencing labor shortages in sectors such as manufacturing, logistics, and healthcare. As a result, companies are increasingly turning toward automation to maintain productivity. Analysts estimate that the global robotics industry could reach hundreds of billions of dollars in market value over the coming decade, as automation spreads into more sectors of the economy. Yet despite this rapid growth, there is still no universal system that allows machines to coordinate economically on a global scale.
When I think about this challenge, I often compare it to the early internet. Before standardized protocols existed, computers struggled to communicate with each other. Once shared infrastructure like TCP/IP emerged, the internet became scalable and open. Fabric is attempting something similar for robotics. The project envisions a world where robots have verifiable digital identities, allowing them to prove who they are and what they are capable of doing. This identity layer is important because machines performing tasks in the real world must be accountable. If a robot performs a delivery, inspects infrastructure, or gathers environmental data, there needs to be a reliable method for verifying that the work actually happened. Fabric’s architecture aims to provide that verification layer.
Another aspect that I find particularly interesting is the concept of machine-to-machine coordination. In traditional systems, robots are usually controlled by centralized platforms operated by individual companies. This limits interoperability and often traps machines inside isolated networks. Fabric proposes an alternative model where robots can interact across open networks, share data, and coordinate tasks without relying on a single centralized authority. Imagine a scenario where a fleet of delivery robots, warehouse robots, and autonomous vehicles can communicate with each other, negotiate tasks, and optimize routes dynamically. Instead of being locked inside one corporate platform, they could operate within a shared economic environment. This idea of an open robot network could fundamentally change how automation systems scale globally.
Of course, none of this would work without a payment system that machines can use autonomously. One of the key pieces of the Fabric ecosystem is its native token, known as ROBO. The token acts as the economic fuel of the network, allowing machines and operators to transact within the system. Robots performing tasks could receive payments automatically, validators could confirm completed work, and contributors could be rewarded for providing data, infrastructure, or computational resources. In this sense, Fabric is not just building communication infrastructure—it is also constructing an economic framework where machines can generate and exchange value.
During my research, I found it particularly notable that Fabric initially plans to build its network infrastructure on top of the Base ecosystem, which itself is built on the broader Ethereum stack. This approach allows Fabric to leverage existing blockchain security and scalability while focusing on its specialized robotics infrastructure. Over time, however, the project’s long-term vision may involve evolving toward a more specialized blockchain architecture optimized for machine coordination and robotic activity.
Another reason Fabric has attracted attention within the crypto ecosystem is its backing from major investors and venture groups. Organizations such as Pantera Capital, Coinbase Ventures, and Digital Currency Group have historically supported infrastructure projects that aim to shape the next generation of decentralized technology. Their involvement suggests that Fabric’s vision is being taken seriously by experienced investors who understand the long-term potential of combining robotics with blockchain networks.
What I find most compelling about Fabric, however, is not just the technology itself but the broader implications. As AI becomes increasingly capable, machines will start performing more economic activities independently. If these systems are controlled entirely by centralized corporations, we could end up with a world where a handful of entities control massive automated workforces. On the other hand, if the infrastructure is open and decentralized, it becomes possible for communities, developers, and entrepreneurs to participate in the robot economy in more equitable ways. Fabric appears to be positioning itself on the latter side of this debate, advocating for a future where robotic infrastructure is governed transparently and accessible globally.
Another scenario that illustrates Fabric’s potential involves autonomous logistics networks. Imagine a global shipping system where autonomous drones, delivery robots, and warehouse machines interact through a shared protocol. A merchant could request a delivery task, a robot could accept the job, sensors could verify completion, and payment could be automatically processed through the network. The entire system would operate with minimal human intervention while still maintaining accountability and transparency. While this may sound ambitious today, the technological pieces required to build such systems are rapidly coming together.
Reflecting on everything I have studied about Fabric, I increasingly see it as an attempt to answer a question that most people have not yet asked: What economic infrastructure will support a world filled with intelligent machines? The internet gave us the infrastructure for digital communication, and blockchain introduced decentralized systems for digital value. Fabric is exploring whether those principles can extend into the physical world of robots and autonomous agents.
From my perspective, the significance of this idea cannot be overstated. Over the next decade, the number of intelligent machines operating in the world could increase dramatically. If those machines are able to coordinate through open economic systems, we may witness the birth of an entirely new layer of the global economy—one where humans and robots collaborate in ways that were previously impossible.
The future that Fabric is envisioning is not just about robotics or cryptocurrency. It is about creating the foundational infrastructure for a new type of economic participant: the intelligent machine. Whether or not Fabric ultimately becomes the dominant platform in this space remains to be seen, but the questions it raises are already incredibly important.
And as I continue researching this emerging sector, one thought keeps returning to my mind: if decentralized networks transformed how humans exchange information and value, it might only be a matter of time before similar systems begin to coordinate the work of machines across the world.
@Fabric Foundation #ROBO $ROBO

Over the past few years, I have spent a significant amount of time studying how emerging technologies reshape global systems. Every technological revolution introduces new tools, but the real transformation happens when those tools become connected through shared infrastructure. The internet connected computers, cloud computing connected services, and blockchain introduced decentralized financial coordination. Now, as artificial intelligence and robotics continue to evolve rapidly, a new question has begun to occupy my attention: how will the world’s intelligent machines connect and collaborate with one another?
While exploring this question, I began researching the work of Fabric Foundation. At first glance, Fabric might appear to be just another project at the intersection of blockchain and artificial intelligence. But as I looked deeper into its concept and architecture, I realized that the project is addressing something much more fundamental. Instead of focusing on a single application or tool, Fabric is exploring how machines themselves could eventually operate within a shared network infrastructure, similar to how computers communicate across the internet today.
What makes this idea particularly compelling is the scale of the robotics revolution that is currently underway. Robotics technology is advancing faster than many people realize. Machines are no longer limited to industrial environments. Autonomous robots are being deployed in logistics centers, agricultural fields, hospitals, warehouses, and even urban infrastructure. According to multiple industry reports, the global robotics market could surpass $200 billion within the next decade, driven by growing demand for automation and intelligent systems.
Major companies are already investing heavily in this future. Tesla has been developing humanoid robots designed to assist with physical labor in industrial environments. Amazon operates massive logistics networks powered by thousands of autonomous warehouse robots that optimize the movement of goods. Meanwhile, advanced robotics companies such as Boston Dynamics continue to push the boundaries of machine mobility and real-world navigation. These developments show that robots are quickly becoming an essential component of modern economic systems.
However, while the capabilities of robots are advancing rapidly, the infrastructure used to connect and coordinate these machines remains surprisingly fragmented. Most robots today operate within isolated ecosystems controlled by specific organizations. Their data is stored in private systems, their learning models are managed by centralized platforms, and their operational insights rarely extend beyond the boundaries of their original networks. In other words, machines are becoming smarter, but they are still learning in isolation.
This is where the vision behind Fabric begins to stand out. The project proposes a future where machines can interact within a decentralized infrastructure designed specifically for coordination, data exchange, and economic participation. Instead of robots functioning as isolated tools inside corporate silos, they could theoretically become participants in a shared network where information, services, and incentives circulate freely.
At the center of this ecosystem is the network’s native digital asset, ROBO. The token is designed to act as the economic layer of the network, enabling value exchange between developers, infrastructure providers, and potentially even autonomous machines that contribute useful work or data. This structure reflects a broader idea emerging across decentralized technologies: that global systems can be coordinated through open protocols rather than centralized control.
When I think about the potential impact of such an infrastructure, I find it helpful to compare it to the early days of the internet. Before networking protocols existed, computers operated largely as standalone devices. Once standardized communication systems were introduced, those machines suddenly became part of a global information network. That transformation unlocked entirely new industries and economic models.
Fabric appears to be exploring whether a similar transition could happen in the world of robotics. If machines could connect through shared protocols, their collective intelligence could grow far more rapidly. A robot learning to navigate complex terrain in one region could contribute insights that improve navigation systems for robots operating thousands of miles away. Data collected by environmental monitoring machines could help researchers understand global climate patterns. Logistics robots operating in different cities could share efficiency improvements that optimize transportation networks worldwide.
These possibilities illustrate how powerful interconnected machine systems could become. Instead of millions of independent robots performing isolated tasks, the world could eventually see large-scale networks of machines collaborating and learning together.
Of course, building such a system is extremely challenging. Integrating decentralized infrastructure with real-world robotics requires solving complex technical problems related to data verification, hardware compatibility, network security, and operational safety. Machines operating in physical environments must maintain extremely high reliability standards, especially when their actions can affect real-world infrastructure or human activity.
Another challenge lies in adoption. For a decentralized robotics network to succeed, it must attract developers, robotics companies, and infrastructure providers willing to build on top of open protocols. Historically, many technology companies prefer to maintain closed ecosystems where they control both data and services. Convincing organizations to participate in shared networks will require strong incentives and clear advantages.
Despite these obstacles, the long-term vision remains fascinating. As artificial intelligence continues to advance, machines will generate enormous amounts of valuable data and perform increasingly complex tasks across industries. The question of how that intelligence is shared and coordinated will become more important with each passing year.
From my perspective, this is why projects like Fabric deserve close attention. They are not simply experimenting with blockchain tokens or decentralized applications. Instead, they are attempting to explore what infrastructure might look like in a world where intelligent machines operate at global scale.
If millions—or even billions—of robots eventually participate in economic activity, they will require systems for identity, coordination, and value exchange. The networks that provide these capabilities could become just as important as the internet infrastructure that supports today’s digital economy.
Whether Fabric ultimately becomes the dominant platform for such coordination or simply contributes to the early exploration of these ideas is still uncertain. Technological revolutions rarely follow predictable paths, and many experiments are required before the right solutions emerge.
But the underlying question the project raises is both important and timely: what kind of network will connect the world’s machines?
As robotics and artificial intelligence continue to expand into every sector of the economy, the answer to that question may define how the next generation of intelligent systems collaborates, learns, and creates value.
In many ways, we may only be at the very beginning of that story.
@Fabric Foundation #ROBO $ROBO

Something interesting is happening in the public conversation right now. Search interest for the “Epstein Files” in the United States has dropped sharply, and the timing lines up almost perfectly with the escalating U.S.–Iran conflict dominating headlines. Just days ago, the Epstein story was one of the most talked-about topics online. Now, it’s being pushed to the background as global tensions take center stage.
From my perspective, this shift shows how quickly attention moves in today’s information cycle. When a major geopolitical event unfolds, it tends to consume the entire news ecosystem. War updates, military developments, and international reactions suddenly become the primary focus, and almost everything else fades into the background. Even stories that once seemed impossible to ignore can suddenly lose momentum when something bigger captures public attention.
The Epstein files had been driving intense debate across social media and news platforms. People were searching for details, discussing the names involved, and questioning how deep the story might go. The topic was trending across multiple platforms and generating huge spikes in search traffic. But once news about rising tensions and military activity involving the United States and Iran began spreading, the conversation shifted almost overnight.
This doesn’t necessarily mean the Epstein story has disappeared. The documents, investigations, and questions surrounding the case are still there. What has changed is the focus of public attention. When a global conflict begins to unfold, people naturally start looking for updates about security, international stability, and the potential economic impact.
In many ways, this moment highlights how the modern news cycle works. Attention moves quickly and often follows the biggest and most urgent developments in real time. Right now, the geopolitical tension between the United States and Iran has become that dominant story.
The real question is whether interest in the Epstein files will return once the global situation stabilizes. History shows that controversial stories rarely disappear completely—they often re-emerge once the spotlight shifts again. For now, though, the focus of the public conversation has clearly moved elsewhere.
#KevinWarshNominationBullOrBear

W ciągu ostatnich kilku miesięcy uważnie obserwowałem jedną z najważniejszych konwergencji technologicznych naszych czasów. Sztuczna inteligencja rozwija się szybko, sprzęt robotyczny staje się coraz bardziej wydolny z każdym rokiem, a zdecentralizowana infrastruktura ewoluuje w potężną warstwę koordynacyjną dla globalnych systemów. Gdy te trzy siły się krzyżują, zaczyna pojawiać się coś całkowicie nowego.
Podczas badania tej konwergencji natknąłem się na wizję stojącą za Fabric Foundation, projektem, który próbuje zbadać jedno z najbardziej pomijanych pytań we współczesnej technologii: jak inteligentne maszyny będą koordynować, dzielić się wiedzą i tworzyć wartość na globalną skalę.

Kiedy zacząłem badać szybkie zbieganie się sztucznej inteligencji, robotyki i zdecentralizowanej infrastruktury, zauważyłem coś interesującego. Większość dzisiejszych dyskusji na temat AI koncentruje się na oprogramowaniu—chatbotach, modelach generatywnych, narzędziach automatyzacji i asystentach cyfrowych. Ale prawdziwa transformacja, która wydaje się zbliżać, nie jest tylko cyfrowa. Jest fizyczna.
Sztuczna inteligencja powoli wychodzi z centrów danych i wchodzi w prawdziwy świat poprzez maszyny. Roboty zaczynają wykonywać zadania, które kiedyś wymagały ludzkiej inteligencji, od logistyki magazynowej po inspekcję infrastruktury, a nawet pomoc w opiece zdrowotnej. Gdy zgłębiłem tę zmianę, natknąłem się na prace Fabric Foundation, projektu, który wydaje się myśleć o tej transformacji na zupełnie innym poziomie.

When I first came across Fabric Foundation, I initially thought it was just another crypto infrastructure project trying to ride the AI narrative. The Web3 ecosystem has seen many such projects before—platforms claiming to merge artificial intelligence with blockchain but ultimately delivering little beyond speculative tokens. However, as I dug deeper into the ecosystem around Fabric, its architecture, and the ideas behind its design, I realized that this project is attempting something much more ambitious.
The vision behind Fabric is not merely to build another blockchain or another tokenized ecosystem. The real ambition is far larger: to create the economic infrastructure for robots and autonomous machines.
This idea may sound futuristic, but the reality is that we are already entering an era where machines can perform meaningful economic work. Autonomous robots deliver packages, inspect infrastructure, assist in warehouses, and even operate in hospitals. Artificial intelligence systems are increasingly capable of decision-making and task execution without direct human supervision. Yet despite this rapid progress, one fundamental piece of the puzzle is still missing: an economic system where machines themselves can participate.
Today, robots operate within closed corporate environments. A warehouse robot in a logistics company cannot collaborate with robots from another network. A machine that collects valuable data cannot sell that data autonomously. Autonomous systems cannot pay for services or interact economically with each other. In essence, machines may perform work, but they remain economically invisible.
The idea behind Fabric is to change that.
Fabric proposes a decentralized infrastructure where robots can obtain identities, interact with digital marketplaces, exchange value, and coordinate tasks using blockchain technology. In this vision, robots are not merely tools controlled by corporations but participants in a global machine economy.
To understand why this matters, it helps to look at the broader transformation happening in technology. For decades, software has dominated innovation. Applications, cloud computing, and digital platforms have reshaped how humans interact with information and services. But the next frontier is not purely digital—it is physical. Artificial intelligence is increasingly embedded in machines capable of acting in the real world.
Robotics researchers estimate that the global robotics market could exceed $200 billion within the next decade, driven by automation across manufacturing, logistics, agriculture, and healthcare. Companies such as Tesla, Boston Dynamics, and Amazon are investing heavily in robotic systems designed to operate autonomously. Meanwhile, advancements in machine learning have dramatically improved perception, planning, and decision-making capabilities for these systems.
Yet despite the massive growth in robotics technology, the economic infrastructure supporting robots remains surprisingly primitive. Robots are owned by companies, controlled by centralized systems, and restricted to specific environments. There is no open network where machines from different organizations can collaborate.
Fabric attempts to introduce such a network.
At the heart of the ecosystem lies the ROBO token, which functions as the native economic unit within the Fabric network. The token is designed to power transactions between humans, developers, and machines. Robots performing useful work could theoretically earn ROBO tokens. Developers building algorithms for robotic systems could be rewarded with the same currency. Infrastructure providers contributing compute resources or data could also participate in this economy.
In many ways, the architecture resembles how decentralized networks already function in the digital world. For example, decentralized compute networks allow individuals to rent out spare GPU capacity to AI developers. Decentralized storage networks enable people to provide hard drive space in exchange for tokens. Fabric extends this logic into the physical world by allowing robots themselves to participate in decentralized marketplaces.
A key concept frequently mentioned in Fabric’s documentation is something called Proof of Robotic Work. Unlike traditional blockchain consensus mechanisms such as Proof of Work or Proof of Stake, this model aims to reward real-world robotic activity. In theory, machines that perform tasks—collecting environmental data, transporting objects, inspecting infrastructure—could prove that work cryptographically and receive token rewards.
This idea is extremely ambitious, because it attempts to bridge two very different domains: blockchain consensus and real-world robotics operations. Verifying work in the digital world is relatively straightforward. Verifying work performed by a physical robot in the real world is far more complex. Sensors can be manipulated, environments can be unpredictable, and verifying results requires sophisticated validation mechanisms.
Nevertheless, the concept opens an intriguing possibility. If successful, it could create an open system where robotic labor becomes measurable, verifiable, and tradable on decentralized markets.
Another aspect that caught my attention during my research was the involvement of venture capital firms and ecosystem supporters within the Fabric project. Crypto infrastructure projects often rely heavily on early-stage funding from venture investors, and Fabric appears to have attracted interest from several well-known funds in the blockchain industry. These investors see potential in the convergence of robotics, artificial intelligence, and decentralized networks.
From a strategic perspective, the narrative surrounding Fabric aligns with several major technology trends. Artificial intelligence is expanding rapidly. Robotics hardware is becoming cheaper and more capable. Blockchain networks are increasingly used to coordinate distributed systems. Fabric positions itself precisely at the intersection of these three forces.
However, ambitious visions also come with significant challenges.
One of the biggest uncertainties surrounding Fabric is the timeline for real-world adoption. Robotics development cycles are far longer than software development cycles. Building autonomous machines that can reliably operate in complex environments requires years of engineering work. Even if the blockchain infrastructure for a robot economy exists, the robots themselves must reach a level of capability where they can meaningfully participate in that economy.
Another challenge is interoperability. For a decentralized robot economy to function, machines from different manufacturers must communicate with shared standards. Historically, robotics platforms have been highly fragmented. Different hardware manufacturers use different operating systems, sensors, and communication protocols. Creating a universal network that can integrate all of these systems will require significant coordination across the robotics industry.
There is also the question of incentives. Blockchain networks succeed when they align incentives among participants. Fabric will need to ensure that developers, robotics companies, and infrastructure providers all benefit from participating in the network. If the incentives are not compelling enough, companies may prefer to maintain closed ecosystems where they control all data and revenue streams.
Despite these challenges, the idea itself is fascinating because it reflects a broader shift in how we think about machines. Historically, machines have been tools owned and operated by humans. In the coming decades, machines may evolve into autonomous economic agents capable of interacting with markets, negotiating services, and generating value independently.
Imagine a future where a delivery robot requests navigation data from another system and pays for it automatically. A drone inspecting power lines might sell the collected imagery to an energy analytics company. Agricultural robots could share environmental data across networks to optimize crop yields globally. In such a world, machines would not merely perform work—they would also participate in the economic ecosystem surrounding that work.
Fabric’s vision attempts to provide the infrastructure for this future.
The implications extend beyond robotics alone. If machines can hold digital identities, manage wallets, and interact with decentralized networks, the boundaries between software agents and physical robots may blur. AI agents operating purely in the digital world could collaborate with robots operating in the physical world, forming complex hybrid systems capable of solving large-scale problems.
From a technological standpoint, this represents a profound transformation in how economic systems operate. Today’s financial infrastructure is designed around human participants—bank accounts, credit systems, regulatory frameworks. A machine economy would require entirely new models for identity, trust, and value exchange.
Whether Fabric ultimately succeeds remains uncertain. The vision is bold, the technical challenges are immense, and the timeline for widespread adoption may extend over many years. Yet even if the project evolves or changes direction, the underlying idea it represents is likely to persist.
The convergence of robotics, artificial intelligence, and decentralized infrastructure appears inevitable. As machines become more capable, the need for open economic systems enabling them to collaborate will grow.
What I find most interesting about Fabric is not simply the token or the technology, but the question it forces us to consider:
What happens when machines become participants in the global economy?
If that future arrives—and the trajectory of technological progress suggests that it might—the infrastructure supporting it will shape how humans, machines, and intelligent systems coexist.
Projects like Fabric may represent the earliest attempts to build that infrastructure.
And whether it succeeds or fails, studying it provides a glimpse into something much larger: the beginning of the machine economy.
@Fabric Foundation #ROBO $ROBO

Kiedy większość ludzi myśli o przyszłości robotyki, wyobrażają sobie lepsze czujniki, mocniejsze siłowniki, szybsze chipy i mądrzejsze modele AI. Sprzęt się poprawia. Modele są trenowane na większych zbiorach danych. Systemy stają się bardziej autonomiczne. Ale im bardziej analizuję tę przestrzeń, tym bardziej jestem przekonany, że prawdziwym wąskim gardłem nie jest inteligencja ani sprzęt. To własność, zachęty i koordynacja.
To jest miejsce, w którym dostrzegam głębszą wizję stojącą za Fabric Foundation — nie jako po prostu kolejna inicjatywa robotyczna, ale jako eksperyment architektury ekonomicznej dla maszyn. Moim zdaniem, następna faza innowacji nie będzie polegała na budowaniu lepszych robotów. Będzie dotyczyła przemyślenia, jak wartość krąży wokół nich.

Im więcej studiuję AI i robotykę, tym bardziej zdaję sobie sprawę, że brakuje czegoś krytycznego. Świętujemy mądrzejsze modele, szybsze chipy i bardziej zdolne maszyny. Śledzimy benchmarki, rundy finansowania i przełomy w sprzęcie. Ale prawie nikt nie mówi o warstwie koordynacyjnej — infrastrukturze ekonomicznej i zarządzającej, która pozwala inteligentnym maszynom działać przejrzyście, autonomicznie i na dużą skalę.
Ta luka dokładnie przyciągnęła moją uwagę do Fabric Foundation. Im głębiej badałem jego wizję, tym bardziej rozumiałem, że to nie jest tylko kolejny eksperyment Web3. To próba zaprojektowania podstawowej infrastruktury dla gospodarki maszyn.

$BTC pchnięto do $69.8K wczoraj i mocno odrzucono. Teraz siedzi na poziomie $67,600
na 15m — dokładnie w środku strefy akceptacji o wysokim wolumenie na wolumenie
profil.
Co pokazuje wykres:
1. Box sesyjny (niebieski) uchwycił pełny impuls z wczoraj z $65K do $69.8K. To
cały ruch właśnie zwrócił 50%+ w jednej sesji.
2. Profil wolumenu pokazuje silną akceptację w okolicach $67-68K — to jest miejsce, w którym rynek
zgodnie z ceną podczas poprzedniej konsolidacji. Jeśli to się utrzyma, to jest baza
na kolejną próbę przy $70K.