IM-HuaHua
Verified Creator
币安小萌新创作者｜BNB长期持有者｜链上淘金人｜链上Alpha猎人｜不在乎一时的暴涨暴跌，只关心如何持续地在市场中找到并抓住赚钱的机会。
Open Trade
Frequent Trader
3.8 Years
526 Following
35.0K+ Followers
17.7K+ Liked
3.1K+ Shared
All
Quotes
Videos
Live
The price keeps declining without stopping; has DUSK really 'gone bad'?
Today's movement of DUSK is quite intuitive: a decline, weak rebounds, continuing to probe downwards, with no clear signals to stop the decline. Many people instinctively attribute this kind of market to 'emotions have collapsed' or 'someone is dumping,' but if we only use this explanation, we might miss more important information. The price continues to decline without a panic exit, which itself is a state worth dissecting. By the way, if it keeps raining outside, people will also slow down.
1. The decline itself is not uncommon; the key is 'how it declines.'
First, let's clarify: the decline of DUSK today is not the kind of emotional sell-off that suddenly increases volume and quickly breaks through multiple support levels. On the contrary, it resembles a process of 'slow weightlessness.' The price moves down in segments, each rebound is brief and weak, yet the selling pressure is not concentrated in a panic.
1. The decline itself is not uncommon; the key is 'how it declines.'
First, let's clarify: the decline of DUSK today is not the kind of emotional sell-off that suddenly increases volume and quickly breaks through multiple support levels. On the contrary, it resembles a process of 'slow weightlessness.' The price moves down in segments, each rebound is brief and weak, yet the selling pressure is not concentrated in a panic.
Near key psychological price levels, DUSK's hesitation is more important than its direction.
Looking at DUSK's current chart, the most informative area isn't the most volatile part, but rather where the price repeatedly pauses. In recent price movements, whenever the price approaches the psychological price level corresponding to the previous high, upward momentum weakens significantly, and trading volume becomes fragmented.
This isn't because the bulls lack funds, but because they are unwilling to continue raising their costs at this level. Conversely, each time the price retraces to the previously repeatedly traded range, selling pressure slows, and the price is rarely pushed down in one go. This indicates that the bears are also hesitant and don't believe this is a "must-pump" level.
From a price level perspective, DUSK is currently stuck in a typical game theory zone: Going upwards requires a new reason to buy; going downwards requires a breakdown in confidence.
Within this range, any one-sided judgment seems hasty. The truly meaningful signal isn't a single candlestick, but which side loses patience first and drives the price down with increased volume. Until then, this back-and-forth movement itself is the market's vote on the current pricing. The above content is for personal analysis only and does not constitute any investment advice.
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK
Looking at DUSK's current chart, the most informative area isn't the most volatile part, but rather where the price repeatedly pauses. In recent price movements, whenever the price approaches the psychological price level corresponding to the previous high, upward momentum weakens significantly, and trading volume becomes fragmented.
This isn't because the bulls lack funds, but because they are unwilling to continue raising their costs at this level. Conversely, each time the price retraces to the previously repeatedly traded range, selling pressure slows, and the price is rarely pushed down in one go. This indicates that the bears are also hesitant and don't believe this is a "must-pump" level.
From a price level perspective, DUSK is currently stuck in a typical game theory zone: Going upwards requires a new reason to buy; going downwards requires a breakdown in confidence.
Within this range, any one-sided judgment seems hasty. The truly meaningful signal isn't a single candlestick, but which side loses patience first and drives the price down with increased volume. Until then, this back-and-forth movement itself is the market's vote on the current pricing. The above content is for personal analysis only and does not constitute any investment advice.
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK
Many people are asking: Why hasn't Plasma followed a 'textbook market trend'? This question itself exposes a habitual misjudgment in the market.
In the expectations of most people, a project that has gone live on a mainstream exchange, with a clear narrative and defined track, should typically follow this price path: post-TGE rise → correction → then follow a trend for a while, at least providing emotional capital with a sense of 'confirmation'. However, $XPL did not strictly follow this path but entered a range-bound fluctuation early on. This is not a coincidence, but rather a result determined by the trading structure. The coffee has gone cold.
The primary reason comes from the misalignment of the 'expectation template'.
The market pricing for Plasma initially applied the template of general public chains or strong narrative projects, assuming it would achieve rapid pricing based on emotions and imagination. However, Plasma itself is more oriented towards infrastructure logic, with use cases leaning towards slow variables. Early on, capital realized that there was a lack of short-term events to continuously stimulate the price. Thus, the motivation for a price increase was naturally insufficient.
The primary reason comes from the misalignment of the 'expectation template'.
The market pricing for Plasma initially applied the template of general public chains or strong narrative projects, assuming it would achieve rapid pricing based on emotions and imagination. However, Plasma itself is more oriented towards infrastructure logic, with use cases leaning towards slow variables. Early on, capital realized that there was a lack of short-term events to continuously stimulate the price. Thus, the motivation for a price increase was naturally insufficient.
XPL 跌了 90%，盘面看起来像是“宣判死刑”。我知道，这个位置大多数人已经在情绪里完成了清仓。
但冷静下来问一句：价格塌了，项目真的塌了吗？
我重新翻了一遍 XPL 的核心逻辑，结论很简单——盘面在崩，底层没怎么动。Paymaster 机制还在跑，稳定币零 Gas 转账不是概念，是直指真实支付场景；BTC 锚定安全，用最硬的资产给自己兜底；11 亿 TVL 还趴在链上，SyrupUSDT 也没走，这不是散户的钱。
所以现在的争议点只剩一个：
这 90% 的跌幅，到底是在宣告失败，还是把所有乐观预期一次性砸干净？
如果你曾经在高位相信过它的逻辑，那现在这个价格，至少不该只用恐慌来做判断。
当情绪已经被价格充分表达，剩下的，才是真正需要判断的部分。
@Plasma #plasma $XPL
但冷静下来问一句：价格塌了，项目真的塌了吗？
我重新翻了一遍 XPL 的核心逻辑，结论很简单——盘面在崩，底层没怎么动。Paymaster 机制还在跑，稳定币零 Gas 转账不是概念，是直指真实支付场景；BTC 锚定安全，用最硬的资产给自己兜底；11 亿 TVL 还趴在链上，SyrupUSDT 也没走，这不是散户的钱。
所以现在的争议点只剩一个：
这 90% 的跌幅，到底是在宣告失败，还是把所有乐观预期一次性砸干净？
如果你曾经在高位相信过它的逻辑，那现在这个价格，至少不该只用恐慌来做判断。
当情绪已经被价格充分表达，剩下的，才是真正需要判断的部分。
@Plasma #plasma $XPL
Don't rush to look at the ups and downs; sometimes the price is just 'busy with other matters.'
If you've been keeping an eye on Vanar's trends lately, you might be feeling a bit impatient.
No pulling, no smashing, no emotions, and even the number of people cursing it has decreased.
But I actually feel that during such times, the price is more honest than usual.
I used to make a common mistake: as soon as I saw the price stagnate, I rushed to find reasons, either doubting that the project was making progress or questioning whether funds had been withdrawn. Later, I realized that at many stages, the price was not really 'responding to the project,' but was busy with other matters, such as screening people.
Let's start with the most obvious change.
The biggest feature of the current price is not that it is falling, but that **the fluctuations have noticeably decreased**. If you rewind time back to when it was just launched, this kind of movement almost didn't exist. Back then, the price rhythm was very fast, rising sharply and falling just as fiercely, with large transactions, and everyone was racing against time. Now it's different; the price is starting to grind, which can be a bit annoying. To be honest, after watching for a while, even the desire to refresh the market will decrease.
No pulling, no smashing, no emotions, and even the number of people cursing it has decreased.
But I actually feel that during such times, the price is more honest than usual.
I used to make a common mistake: as soon as I saw the price stagnate, I rushed to find reasons, either doubting that the project was making progress or questioning whether funds had been withdrawn. Later, I realized that at many stages, the price was not really 'responding to the project,' but was busy with other matters, such as screening people.
Let's start with the most obvious change.
The biggest feature of the current price is not that it is falling, but that **the fluctuations have noticeably decreased**. If you rewind time back to when it was just launched, this kind of movement almost didn't exist. Back then, the price rhythm was very fast, rising sharply and falling just as fiercely, with large transactions, and everyone was racing against time. Now it's different; the price is starting to grind, which can be a bit annoying. To be honest, after watching for a while, even the desire to refresh the market will decrease.
How do brothers do daily trading tasks?
A daily return rate of 3-5% can offset the transaction fees.
As long as you are not greedy, normal fluctuations are easy to achieve.
However, there is still the risk of holding contracts.
Everyone should use this method with caution; if you are not familiar with trading, do not invest a large amount at once.
You can try it multiple times; I trade 5050 daily, opening and closing a volume of 10,000.
The above content is only personal analysis and does not constitute any investment advice.
@Vanarchain #Vanar $VANRY
A daily return rate of 3-5% can offset the transaction fees.
As long as you are not greedy, normal fluctuations are easy to achieve.
However, there is still the risk of holding contracts.
Everyone should use this method with caution; if you are not familiar with trading, do not invest a large amount at once.
You can try it multiple times; I trade 5050 daily, opening and closing a volume of 10,000.
The above content is only personal analysis and does not constitute any investment advice.
@Vanarchain #Vanar $VANRY
If DUSK is viewed as a 'trading asset', many debates will naturally disappear
In the discussions around DUSK, there is a recurring misalignment: many people use the expectations of 'allocative assets' to evaluate an entity that has not yet completed its role transition. This misalignment can directly lead to misjudgments about price, rhythm, and market reactions.
From another perspective, if we temporarily take DUSK out of concepts like 'long-term narrative' and 'ultimate value' and only view it as an asset that is being repeatedly traded and continuously calibrated by the market, many phenomena become easier to explain.
1. At the current stage, the market is trading not on the future, but on the range.
From another perspective, if we temporarily take DUSK out of concepts like 'long-term narrative' and 'ultimate value' and only view it as an asset that is being repeatedly traded and continuously calibrated by the market, many phenomena become easier to explain.
1. At the current stage, the market is trading not on the future, but on the range.
Binance Square is worth building
HiSeven
·
--
Binance Square: Strategizing an 'Ecological Chess Game', now is a great opportunity to get onboard.
The first round of 100 BNB creator incentives has just ended, and the second round of 200 BNB follows immediately, with more flexible rules and broader coverage.
This is not a simple subsidy, nor a short-term traffic stimulus.
It is more like sending a signal to all creators:
Binance has decided to regard Binance Square as a long-term core position for development.
1. From 'Only Transactions' to 'Warm Transactions Community'
As the world's NO.1 exchange, Binance does not lack trading volume or product lines.
What is truly scarce is the connection between people beyond transactions.
This is not a simple subsidy, nor a short-term traffic stimulus.
It is more like sending a signal to all creators:
Binance has decided to regard Binance Square as a long-term core position for development.
1. From 'Only Transactions' to 'Warm Transactions Community'
As the world's NO.1 exchange, Binance does not lack trading volume or product lines.
What is truly scarce is the connection between people beyond transactions.
Between compliance and permissionless, DUSK is taking a path that few dare to tread.
Many people watching DUSK have the first reaction of 'the pace is not fast' and 'the market is not standard.' But if we look at it in the context of financial infrastructure, we will find a fact: the problem it solves should not be measured by emotional market sentiment.
Most public chains default to accepting probabilistic finality, but in real financial scenarios, this is almost unacceptable. Once a settlement occurs, it must be certain and irreversible. The choice made by DUSK at the consensus layer essentially places 'financial-grade certainty' into the protocol, instead of relying on applications or off-chain systems for remediation. This directly determines that its target users are not retail speculators but institutions with zero tolerance for settlement risk.
Most public chains default to accepting probabilistic finality, but in real financial scenarios, this is almost unacceptable. Once a settlement occurs, it must be certain and irreversible. The choice made by DUSK at the consensus layer essentially places 'financial-grade certainty' into the protocol, instead of relying on applications or off-chain systems for remediation. This directly determines that its target users are not retail speculators but institutions with zero tolerance for settlement risk.
【Can the trading volume support the current DUSK price level】
Looking at DUSK's recent trends, if we only focus on the price, it can be quite confusing; but when we incorporate the trading volume, the judgment becomes much clearer. The price is oscillating within a range, but the volume hasn't significantly shrunk, nor has it suddenly spiked, which in itself is informative.
From the perspective of point structure, every time the price returns to the lower edge of the range, the trading volume increases, but it's not in a panic manner; it feels more like normal turnover, with both selling and buying occurring. This indicates that the current price level is not a situation of 'no demand', but rather the market is reallocating positions. Conversely, when the price approaches the upper edge of the range, the volume does not drastically increase, and the willingness to chase prices is clearly limited.
This type of volume-price relationship usually means that the price can still hold, but there are no conditions for a sudden surge in the short term. My viewpoint is quite clear: as long as the trading volume can maintain at the current level, price fluctuations within the range are normal digestion; any occurrence of 'price drop, and volume also shrinks' would be the real position to be cautious about.
The current DUSK seems to be indicating through trading that: within this range, there are participants willing to trade repeatedly.
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK
Looking at DUSK's recent trends, if we only focus on the price, it can be quite confusing; but when we incorporate the trading volume, the judgment becomes much clearer. The price is oscillating within a range, but the volume hasn't significantly shrunk, nor has it suddenly spiked, which in itself is informative.
From the perspective of point structure, every time the price returns to the lower edge of the range, the trading volume increases, but it's not in a panic manner; it feels more like normal turnover, with both selling and buying occurring. This indicates that the current price level is not a situation of 'no demand', but rather the market is reallocating positions. Conversely, when the price approaches the upper edge of the range, the volume does not drastically increase, and the willingness to chase prices is clearly limited.
This type of volume-price relationship usually means that the price can still hold, but there are no conditions for a sudden surge in the short term. My viewpoint is quite clear: as long as the trading volume can maintain at the current level, price fluctuations within the range are normal digestion; any occurrence of 'price drop, and volume also shrinks' would be the real position to be cautious about.
The current DUSK seems to be indicating through trading that: within this range, there are participants willing to trade repeatedly.
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK
After the market heat cools down, does the price of DUSK show any anomalies?
In the past few days, discussions about DUSK have noticeably decreased, but the price has not followed suit, which is actually quite critical. In a normal situation where sentiment wanes, the currency often experiences ‘no one is talking, the price collapses first’; whereas DUSK feels more like ‘no one is arguing, but the transactions are still happening.’
From a price point of view, it has consistently operated within the range formed by the previous volume increase. When it dips to the lower edge of the range, selling pressure eases, and as it approaches previous high positions, hesitation occurs. This indicates that current buying and selling are more based on positional judgment rather than sentiment-driven.
My conclusion is very straightforward: as long as the price continues to be traded repeatedly within this core range, a decrease in heat is instead a signal of neutral preference, rather than a precursor to weakness. What truly needs to be wary is when discussions cool, and the price directly loses key ranges, that is when demand disappears.
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK
In the past few days, discussions about DUSK have noticeably decreased, but the price has not followed suit, which is actually quite critical. In a normal situation where sentiment wanes, the currency often experiences ‘no one is talking, the price collapses first’; whereas DUSK feels more like ‘no one is arguing, but the transactions are still happening.’
From a price point of view, it has consistently operated within the range formed by the previous volume increase. When it dips to the lower edge of the range, selling pressure eases, and as it approaches previous high positions, hesitation occurs. This indicates that current buying and selling are more based on positional judgment rather than sentiment-driven.
My conclusion is very straightforward: as long as the price continues to be traded repeatedly within this core range, a decrease in heat is instead a signal of neutral preference, rather than a precursor to weakness. What truly needs to be wary is when discussions cool, and the price directly loses key ranges, that is when demand disappears.
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK
If we only look at trading behavior, what signals has Plasma already released?
In the current market environment, it is difficult to determine the true stage of a project solely based on narratives. A more effective approach is to temporarily set aside all 'visions, roadmaps, and long-term stories' and focus on one thing: how the funds are being used for this asset. By placing Plasma within this pure trading framework, we can see that the market has actually provided some clear signals.
First, from the perspective of price behavior, $XPL has not exhibited a typical emotional trend. After going live on Binance, there has been neither sustained volume increase leading to a one-sided trend nor a concentrated sell-off at critical positions. This indicates that short-term capital has not attempted to drive prices quickly through emotions, but instead has chosen to repeatedly engage in game theory within a relatively clear range. For the trading market, this represents a somewhat rational state.
First, from the perspective of price behavior, $XPL has not exhibited a typical emotional trend. After going live on Binance, there has been neither sustained volume increase leading to a one-sided trend nor a concentrated sell-off at critical positions. This indicates that short-term capital has not attempted to drive prices quickly through emotions, but instead has chosen to repeatedly engage in game theory within a relatively clear range. For the trading market, this represents a somewhat rational state.
From the perspective of "whether the current trading volume supports the price range", the trend of $XPL in the past 24 hours is not weak. The price has been fluctuating around $0.12, but the trading volume has not significantly shrunk, indicating that this range is not passively stuck, but rather real trading is occurring.
If it were a capital withdrawal situation, common characteristics would be sideways price movement and a simultaneous decline in trading volume, but $XPL has not shown this situation. The ability of volume to match price stability means that the market recognizes the current range as a reasonable pricing for the short term, rather than a temporary stopping point.
In this structure, the short-term direction depends more on new variables rather than the existing range collapsing on its own.
The above content is only personal analysis and does not constitute any investment advice.
@Plasma #plasma $XPL
If it were a capital withdrawal situation, common characteristics would be sideways price movement and a simultaneous decline in trading volume, but $XPL has not shown this situation. The ability of volume to match price stability means that the market recognizes the current range as a reasonable pricing for the short term, rather than a temporary stopping point.
In this structure, the short-term direction depends more on new variables rather than the existing range collapsing on its own.
The above content is only personal analysis and does not constitute any investment advice.
@Plasma #plasma $XPL
Why hasn't Vanar followed the familiar market trends?
Recently, I've seen many people ask the same question: Why is Vanar always moving sideways, not pulling up or crashing? Is there something wrong? To be honest, when I first started looking at the market, I had similar doubts. But after extending the time frame and breaking down the trades, I actually find its current movement quite reasonable.
1. Everyone initially used the wrong reference frame
Many people subconsciously default to a set of 'standard market templates':
Launch → Emotions rise for a while → Volume breakout → Pullback → Another wave comes.
The premise for this template to hold is actually very strict: the narrative must be intuitive enough, participants must be short-term enough, and everyone must be willing to chase prices. From the start, Vanar has not fully met these two conditions.
1. Everyone initially used the wrong reference frame
Many people subconsciously default to a set of 'standard market templates':
Launch → Emotions rise for a while → Volume breakout → Pullback → Another wave comes.
The premise for this template to hold is actually very strict: the narrative must be intuitive enough, participants must be short-term enough, and everyone must be willing to chase prices. From the start, Vanar has not fully met these two conditions.
$VANRY In the last 24 hours, the price I've been watching the most is around 0.0073. As soon as the price hits here, there are buyers, but when it pushes up towards 0.0076, there's basically no volume, and it quickly gets pushed back down. To put it bluntly, no one is in a rush.
My thinking is pretty straightforward: I'm not chasing now, just waiting to see if it gets close to 0.0073 to see if there's a quick rebound. If there is, I'll take a small position; if it breaks down and doesn't come back, then I'll exit first.
There’s no new news on the project side, it’s still all about the price in the short term.
@Vanarchain #Vanar $VANRY
My thinking is pretty straightforward: I'm not chasing now, just waiting to see if it gets close to 0.0073 to see if there's a quick rebound. If there is, I'll take a small position; if it breaks down and doesn't come back, then I'll exit first.
There’s no new news on the project side, it’s still all about the price in the short term.
@Vanarchain #Vanar $VANRY
Why DUSK Did Not Follow the 'Standard Market Trend' Expected
If we expect according to the script familiar to many, DUSK should have followed a more 'smooth' path: launch - volume increase - rise - correction - then give direction. However, the actual trend clearly did not align with this expectation, leading to many judgments starting to become distorted from here.
First, let's talk about the expectations themselves. The market's first layer of expectation for DUSK actually does not come from the trading structure, but from the labels: privacy, compliance, infrastructure. These labels can easily be automatically translated into 'mid-term trend coins', but the problem is that labels do not directly translate into short-term coordinated actions. In the early stages, funds are more about validation rather than betting.
First, let's talk about the expectations themselves. The market's first layer of expectation for DUSK actually does not come from the trading structure, but from the labels: privacy, compliance, infrastructure. These labels can easily be automatically translated into 'mid-term trend coins', but the problem is that labels do not directly translate into short-term coordinated actions. In the early stages, funds are more about validation rather than betting.
Yes
Grace-blue bird
·
--
KGeN: It's not about emotions, it's about cash flow. This Web3 project earns 80 million dollars a year
After being in the Web3 circle for a long time, you gradually become aware of a somewhat harsh reality:
The stories are getting grander, but the actual income that can be secured is getting less and less.
AI, the metaverse, on-chain identity, decentralized social... there are almost new projects discussing these narratives every day. They all sound very advanced, but if you continue to ask one more question—where does the money come from, most projects will quickly revert to that old path: issuing tokens, creating hype, courting liquidity, and leaving the rest to market luck.
It is precisely because of this that more and more people are starting to become impatient.
The stories are getting grander, but the actual income that can be secured is getting less and less.
AI, the metaverse, on-chain identity, decentralized social... there are almost new projects discussing these narratives every day. They all sound very advanced, but if you continue to ask one more question—where does the money come from, most projects will quickly revert to that old path: issuing tokens, creating hype, courting liquidity, and leaving the rest to market luck.
It is precisely because of this that more and more people are starting to become impatient.
What changes occurred in the chip structure of DUSK after the TGE?
If you only focus on the K-line, it's easy to overlook a more important issue: the people trading DUSK now are not the same as those at the time of the TGE. Price is just the result; what truly determines the subsequent trend is actually the chip structure.
Let's go back to the early stage of the TGE. The typical characteristic of DUSK during that phase was just one — a high degree of liquidity in the chips. Whether it was airdrops, early participants, or funds entering for short-term fluctuations, the goal was very consistent: to find liquidity and realize expectations. The role of price in this phase was not 'pricing' but 'releasing'. What was released was the early uncertainty, also providing the market with an opportunity to redistribute the chips.
Let's go back to the early stage of the TGE. The typical characteristic of DUSK during that phase was just one — a high degree of liquidity in the chips. Whether it was airdrops, early participants, or funds entering for short-term fluctuations, the goal was very consistent: to find liquidity and realize expectations. The role of price in this phase was not 'pricing' but 'releasing'. What was released was the early uncertainty, also providing the market with an opportunity to redistribute the chips.
The real signal after the decline in DUSK market discussion heat
Recently, the discussion heat around DUSK has receded, but the price structure has not weakened in sync; instead, it remains intact. This combination of 'declining heat, stable price' often indicates that trading demand is starting to detach from emotional drivers.
When a coin no longer needs ongoing topics to maintain its price, the only question that really matters is: Are there actually people willing to trade repeatedly at this level.
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK
Recently, the discussion heat around DUSK has receded, but the price structure has not weakened in sync; instead, it remains intact. This combination of 'declining heat, stable price' often indicates that trading demand is starting to detach from emotional drivers.
When a coin no longer needs ongoing topics to maintain its price, the only question that really matters is: Are there actually people willing to trade repeatedly at this level.
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK
DUSK's Positioning After Launching on Binance
From a temporal and structural perspective, DUSK has clearly moved past the initial emotional release phase. The current price is more determined by trading behavior rather than being driven by news or topics.
This means the market is transitioning from 'storytelling' to 'cost calculation', attempting to give DUSK a relatively reasonable trading range rather than simply chasing highs and cutting losses.
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK
From a temporal and structural perspective, DUSK has clearly moved past the initial emotional release phase. The current price is more determined by trading behavior rather than being driven by news or topics.
This means the market is transitioning from 'storytelling' to 'cost calculation', attempting to give DUSK a relatively reasonable trading range rather than simply chasing highs and cutting losses.
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK
Login to explore more contents