567B

On November 29, 2025, an NVIDIA H100 cluster located in a server room in the suburbs of Bangkok, Thailand, can bring its owner a pure rental income of $47 per hour.
This machine has never been listed on any exchange, yet it has already been 'crowdfunded' by 37,000 retail investors worldwide - they haven't even seen what it looks like, only having a string of tokens called sAID in their wallets, quietly earning rent every week.
This is what GAIB is doing: directly fragmenting the money-burning GPUs, robots, and data centers in the real world onto the blockchain, allowing you and me to be 'invisible shareholders'.

The Federal Reserve will stop balance sheet reduction (quantitative tightening, QT) starting December 1, 2025, marking a transition from liquidity tightening to a neutral reinvestment state. This policy aims to maintain bank reserves at 'abundant' levels (approximately $3 trillion) to avoid further tightening that could trigger volatility in the money market.
The cessation of balance sheet reduction essentially means the end of net capital outflows, with liquidity no longer decreasing by approximately $38.5 billion per month, but instead maintaining the balance sheet stability through the reinvestment of short-term Treasury bills. The impact on the dollar presents a pattern of short-term volatility and medium to long-term weakening, with a detailed analysis as follows.

First: money is not printed by the state
The banking system itself will automatically expand the money supply
The vast majority of money is not printed by the central bank, but is:
Bank loans = new money generated out of thin air
For example, if the bank gives you a mortgage of 1,000,000, that 1,000,000 is newly generated money.
As long as: housing prices rise, companies expand, local governments incur debt, and residents take out mortgages, the money supply will continue to increase.
China is one of the economies with the highest proportion of bank credit in the world, which means:
> China's monetary expansion is essentially 'credit-driven' rather than 'produced by a printing press'.

Is the bear market making you panic? Are you holding funds but can't find a way out? Stop stubbornly clinging to volatile mainstream coins! GAIB is bringing a disruptive approach to on-chain AI infrastructure, using the triple buff of 'AI infrastructure tokenization + RWA asset backing + DeFi yield closed loop' to create a wealth channel that guarantees profits in the bear market, allowing you to passively reap industry dividends!
GAIB directly brings the AI infrastructure of the real world onto the chain, transforming massive GPU computing resources into investable and profitable on-chain assets! It is important to know that behind AI big model training, data processing, and cloud services, there is a market with a demand for computing power worth hundreds of billions, and the funding solutions built by GAIB are helping cloud service providers and data centers bridge the last mile of resource monetization — this means that what you are investing in is not an abstract concept, but real AI industrial infrastructure, a hard demand track that crosses bull and bear cycles!

In Silicon Valley's landscape of tech giants, Bill Gates and Elon Musk are legends in their own right: the former built the Microsoft empire, while the latter pioneered innovations at Tesla and SpaceX. Yet their rivalry erupted over a short-selling bet, evolving into a long-standing public conflict. Rumors of Gates shorting Tesla have simmered since coming to light in 2022, with Musk repeatedly "firing shots" on X, warning Gates to "cover his position ASAP." Beyond estimated losses of $1.5–2 billion, this feud has laid bare profound disagreements over climate ideology, charitable approaches, and corporate missions.

 
I. Origin: 2022 Text Leak Ignites Public Feud

It all began in April 2022, when The New York Times published leaked text messages between Gates and Musk, sending shockwaves through public discourse.

Musk confronted Gates directly:

"Do you still hold a $500 million short position on Tesla?"

Gates replied:

"Sorry, I haven’t closed it yet. I wanted to discuss potential charity collaborations."

Musk shot back coldly:

"I can’t take your climate change charity proposals seriously when you’re shorting Tesla—this company is the single most important player in solving the climate crisis."

The leak exposed Gates’ secret short position on Tesla. Reports suggest he initiated the bet around 2019, when Tesla’s stock traded below $200 amid widespread skepticism. Gates’ short was rooted in traditional value-investing logic, but Tesla’s subsequent surge—driven by skyrocketing Model 3/Y sales and technological breakthroughs—pushed its share price above $400.

Musk later stated publicly on X:

"Gates’ short position has ballooned to $1.5–2 billion. If Tesla keeps rising, he’ll go bankrupt."

Walter Isaacson’s biography of Musk confirmed: Gates’ initial $500 million short turned into massive losses as Tesla’s market cap surpassed $1 trillion.

For Musk, Gates’ move wasn’t just a financial transaction—it was a "betrayal of values." Tesla’s mission is to accelerate the transition to sustainable energy, and Gates, an outspoken environmental advocate, betting against its success was unforgivable in Musk’s eyes.

Gates downplayed the controversy:

"Shorting a stock doesn’t hurt anyone. I’ve invested far more in climate solutions than Musk has."

This response only fueled Musk’s anger.

 

II. Escalation: Musk’s "Bankruptcy Warning" and Gates’ "Extremely Mean" Allegation

Since 2022, Musk has repeatedly revisited the feud in public:

December 2024:

"If Tesla becomes the world’s most valuable company, Gates’ short position will bankrupt him multiple times over."

He even mocked:

"From day one, this was a giant F**k you to Gates."

November 17, 2025 (Current Date):
Musk issued a "final warning":

"If Gates hasn’t closed this crazy 8-year short yet, he’d better act fast."

The post garnered massive fan engagement, keeping the controversy in the spotlight.

Gates responded more restrainedly. In a 2023 interview, he stated:

"Once he found out I shorted Tesla, he became extremely mean to me."

In a 2025 conversation, Gates further emphasized:

"I never intended to hurt Musk—Tesla’s success speaks to his vision."

Musk, however, has never accepted this explanation, repeatedly labeling Gates a "hypocrite" who preaches environmentalism while betting against an electric vehicle company.

Their conflicts have since spilled over into other areas:

- Gates dismissed Mars colonization as impractical
​
- Musk mocked Gates for being tied to "vaccine conspiracy theories"
​
- Gates expanded investments in hydrogen energy
​
- Musk implied Gates was "opposing the EV revolution"

The two tech icons have also split public opinion into opposing camps.

 

III. Root Cause: Long-Standing Divides in Climate and Charity Ideologies

The short position was merely a symptom—at its core lies a fundamental clash of beliefs:

1. Divergent Climate Strategies

- Gates: Advocates a prudent approach, investing in diversified solutions like carbon capture and hydrogen energy.
​
- Musk: Champions "full electrification"; Tesla is his primary tool for achieving decarbonization.

Gates has questioned the safety of self-driving technology, while Musk criticized Gates for "failing to understand the EV revolution."

2. Conflicting Charitable Philosophies

- Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation: Focuses on traditional public issues like global health, sanitation, and education.
​
- Musk Foundation: Prioritizes future-focused tech initiatives such as AI, renewable energy, and space exploration.

In 2022, when Gates proposed collaborating on climate action, Musk rejected the offer citing the short position, stating:

"Gates’ wealth comes from Microsoft’s monopoly, not innovation."

This conflict reflects a generational divide in Silicon Valley: "the software era vs. the hardware era."

 

IV. Public Opinion and Industry Impact

The feud has polarized public opinion:

- Musk’s fans: Accuse Gates of short-sightedness and conservatism.
​
- Gates’ supporters: Criticize Musk for being emotional and manipulating public opinion via social media.

Tesla’s stock briefly dropped 5% after the text leak but later surged amid backlash, with its market cap even exceeding $3 trillion. Gates’ losses have become a punchline in tech circles (though exact figures remain unconfirmed).

 

V. Implications and Outlook: A Tech Giant "Drama"

The feud’s impact extends far beyond personal rivalry:

- Gates’ short-selling failure serves as a cautionary tale about market risks.
​
- Tesla’s resilience has strengthened confidence in the EV sector.

In 2025, Tesla continues to advance the Cybertruck and Robotaxi initiatives;
the Gates Foundation is doubling down on prudent climate solutions like hydrogen energy.

The "cold war" between the two is unlikely to end anytime soon.

If Tesla’s market cap keeps rising, Musk’s claim that "Gates could go bankrupt multiple times"—while exaggerated—symbolizes the essence of their dispute:
This is not just a battle of wealth, but a collision of tech routes, values, and visions for the future.
#bitcoin #Tesla

On the evening of November 14, 2025, $BTC saw a sharp decline, falling from an intraday high of around $105,000 to the $98,000 range—a drop of more than 7% and the lowest level in nearly six months.
This pullback didn’t come out of nowhere; it was the result of multiple factors converging. First, Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s latest remarks crushed market hopes for further rate cuts. He emphasized persistent inflation pressures and suggested interest rates could remain elevated through 2026. This directly reduced the appeal of risk assets. As a high-risk asset sensitive to macro policy shifts, Bitcoin was hit quickly as investors moved into risk-off mode, triggering a wave of selling.
Second, weakening institutional demand played a major role. Data showed the Coinbase Premium Index pulling back, indicating lower institutional buying appetite. At the same time, Bitcoin ETFs saw unusually large outflows, with more than $500 million in net redemptions in a single day. Long-term holders also started taking profits—on-chain data indicated last week’s movement of older coins was equivalent to roughly 20,000 BTC being sold, increasing supply pressure. Market fatigue intensified as U.S. tech stocks dropped in tandem, with the Dow falling more than 1%, dragging on the broader crypto ecosystem.
In addition, technical breakdowns amplified fear. BTC fell below the key $100,000 support level, triggering a chain reaction of algorithmic stop-loss orders, with trading volume surging 30%. Geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and policy uncertainty following the U.S. election added further stress, boosting risk-off sentiment.
Overall, this drop was a “perfect storm” of macro tightening, institutional pullback, and technical breakdown. In the short term, Bitcoin may test the $90,000 level. But over the long run, the halving effect and renewed institutional positioning may provide support.

Outlook After the U.S. Government Reopens
After more than 40 days of shutdown, the U.S. government reached a deal to reopen early on November 14, unlocking $850 billion in Treasury funding. This eases liquidity constraints and allows the SEC to resume normal operations, potentially giving the crypto market some breathing room next week. If Bitcoin holds the $98,000 support level, it could start a new upward trend.
With policy uncertainty fading, confidence may improve. The Trump administration’s pro-crypto stance could accelerate ETF approvals and mining incentives. Bitcoin could push toward $150,000 in 2026, supported by U.S.–China and India trade agreements and improving global liquidity. However, traders should stay alert to the impact of delayed inflation data, as short-term volatility may continue. Still, the reopening marks a potential signal of a recovering bull market.#bitcoin #BitcoinETFs