With Sun Yuchen's public chain as a foundation, USDD 2.0 relies on these hardcore technologies to eliminate decoupling risks
The TRON public chain created by Sun Yuchen, relying on a mature smart contract system and massive node support, has become the technological incubator for USDD 2.0. As the core stablecoin of this public chain, USDD 2.0 can withstand fierce market fluctuations and firmly anchor to the US dollar, relying not on luck, but on a set of interconnected hardcore technological systems, especially the technologies of over-collateralized smart contract control and dynamic liquidation, which fundamentally block the risks of decoupling and security vulnerabilities. Below, we will dissect these technical details. First, let's look at the intelligent control technology of over-collateralization, which is the security cornerstone of USDD 2.0. It uses a Collateralized Debt Position (CDP) model, where users who want to mint USDD must lock assets like TRX and sTRX into smart contracts. Moreover, the system will flexibly adjust the collateralization ratio according to asset fluctuations; for highly volatile cryptocurrency assets, the collateralization ratio will be set higher. More thoughtfully, with the sTRX collateral function, users can still earn staking rewards while using staked TRX as collateral to mint coins, ensuring both collateral security and improving capital utilization. All these collateral assets are stored in publicly available contract addresses, and by entering the address in browsers like TRONSCAN, one can check the balance. The smart contract will also monitor the asset value in real-time, ensuring that the value of collateral assets never falls below the value of issued USDD.
Binance Wallet heavily launches the Yield+ USDD USDT financial activity, with a total reward of 300,000 USDD to be distributed within 30 days! For beginners, this is a great opportunity to participate in cryptocurrency finance with a low threshold. You only need to invest at least 100 USDT to enjoy dual benefits: a benchmark annualized return rate of 12% on sUSDD, plus an activity reward annualized return rate of up to 25.82% currently. In simple terms, if you invest 1000 USDT, based on the current reward ratio, you can expect to earn approximately (12%+25.82%)÷12≈3.15% in returns within 30 days, which is about 31.5 USDD in additional income.
1. Core Gameplay of the Activity This is a "Money Makes Money" activity launched by Binance Wallet, participating with USDT (stablecoin). Within 30 days, a total of 300,000 USDD rewards will be distributed, with 10,000 USDD distributed daily (USDD is also a stablecoin, pegged to the US dollar at 1:1).
2. Three Steps to Participate 1. **Invest USDT**: Transfer your USDT to the Binance Wallet. 2. **Exchange for USDD**: Convert USDT to USDD in the wallet. 3. **Deposit sUSDD**: Then deposit USDD into the "sUSDD" investment pool, and the earnings will start to accumulate. Many people only do the second step and will not receive rewards, so be careful.
3. Key Rules - **Low Threshold**: You can participate with a minimum investment of 100 USDT (≈100 USD). - **No Upper Limit**: You can invest any amount, there are no limits. - **Earnings are Divided into Two Parts**: - Basic Earnings: Annualized 12% (the earnings of sUSDD itself) - Activity Rewards: Additional annualized 25.82% (this rate may change). The more you invest, the less reward you get.
4. Example If you invest 1000 USDT: 1. First, convert it to 1000 USDD. 2. Deposit for 30 days, Basic Earnings ≈ 1000×12%×(30/365) ≈ 9.86 USDD. 3. Activity Rewards ≈ 1000×25.82%×(30/365) ≈ 21.2 USDD. 4. Total Earnings Daily ≈ 31 USDD (≈31 USD).
5. Important Notes - Rewards are distributed daily, but you have to wait until the activity ends to receive them all. - USDD and USDT are both stablecoins, with low price volatility and lower risk, #USDD以稳见信 @USDD - Decentralized USD
Is USDD safe? Over-collateralization + 5 audits tell you the answer
Recently, many friends have asked me: "Is USDD really safe?" After all, there have been examples of some stablecoins crashing, so it's normal for everyone to feel apprehensive. Today, let's break down the fundamentals of USDD in plain language — oh no, I mean its safety net! After reading this, you will know whether this thing is reliable or not. Your money is backed by "over-collateralization". First, let me ask everyone a question: If you lend 100 dollars to a friend, what collateral would make you feel most at ease? A. A mobile phone worth 100 dollars B. Gold worth 150 dollars Even a fool knows to choose B, right? USDD operates on this logic — over-collateralization. In simple terms, it means that for every 1 dollar of USDD issued, there must be more than 1 dollar of assets backing it.
Is USDD's price as steady as a rock? PSM arbitrage mechanism + 50 million liquidity revealed
Recently, the stablecoin market in the crypto world has been like a roller coaster—USDX unpegged and plummeted by 30%, while USDe flashed crash and then rebounded, making everyone hesitant to move the stablecoins in their hands. But one coin has remained stable at $0.999 like a stabilizing force; that is USDD! Today, let's take a look at why other stablecoins are stumbling while USDD remains steady as a rock? PSM arbitrage mechanism: the secret weapon that keeps prices always 'roughly the same' First, let me ask everyone a question: if a supermarket prices cola at 1 yuan, and someone insists on selling it for 0.9 yuan, what would you do? Of course, you would stock up and resell it to the supermarket! The PSM mechanism of USDD plays by this logic, just replacing cola with stablecoins.
Analysis of USDD's Stability Mechanism: Why Can It Stand Alone Amidst a Market Crash?
1. PSM Arbitrage Mechanism: The market's "automatic stabilizer" Imagine you have a "price balancer"—when the price of USDD is below $1, you can exchange 1 USDD for 1 USDT (real dollars stablecoin) in seconds; when the price is above $1, you can exchange 1 USDT back for 1 USDD. This risk-free arbitrage opportunity acts like an invisible hand, always pulling the price back towards $1. For example: If USDD drops to $0.995, arbitrageurs will frantically buy USDD and then exchange it for USDT, instantly making a profit of $0.005. A large amount of buying will push the price up until the arbitrage opportunity disappears. The opposite is also true.
Why can USDD reliably maintain a value of 1 dollar?
Stablecoins, the key lies in 'stability'. We have seen too many stablecoins experience price roller coasters, so what tricks does USDD have to make itself wobble like a top and return to 1 dollar regardless of how it is pushed? The secret lies in its establishment of an 'official 1:1 exchange store', scientifically known as PSM.
This 'official store' is particularly domineering; it announces: regardless of whether the market price outside is rising or falling, you can always exchange 1 USDD for 1 USDT here, or exchange 1 USDT for 1 USDD, with the exchange rate remaining unchanged.
Don't underestimate this store; it is the 'stabilizing force' in the market. Why is it so powerful? Because it activates the strongest force in the market—arbitrage, also known as 'flippers'.
Let me give you an example to clarify. Suppose due to market panic, USDD drops to 0.99 dollars on the exchange. The 'flippers' will light up with excitement and take immediate action: they buy USDD at the market price of 0.99 dollars and then rush into the 'official store' to exchange it 1:1 for 1 dollar worth of USDT. In this flip, each USDD nets a profit of 1 cent.
Just think, with so many 'flippers' scrambling to buy cheap USDD in the market, what will happen? The demand surges, and the price of USDD will naturally be quickly pulled back to 1 dollar. Conversely, if USDD rises to 1.01 dollars, the 'flippers' will sell the USDD they bought from the 'official store' in the market to profit from the price difference, which will again push the price back down.
Therefore, the price stability of USDD does not rely on the team spending money to buy and sell in the market to 'support the price', but rather relies on this 'official store' setting an unyielding anchor point, and then leveraging the flippers' instinct for profit to automatically pull the price back on track. This mechanism is very clever, equivalent to using economic principles to equip itself with an automatic stabilizer. @USDD - Decentralized USD ##USDD以稳见信
#币安安全星期四 A total of 10,000 spots, each spot gives 5 yuan, needs to be forwarded to be eligible, currently there are still 7,000 spots available, those who want it please answer the question below $BNB
币安Binance华语
--
😈When you see an official person's Web2 social media account: "I am about to release a new meme..."
What will you do❓ A. It must have been hacked, I will DM her to confirm B. Trust the official announcement, significant information will definitely not be released through private channels! C. I have a bold idea to seize the opportunity to apply for a job...🤓☝️
✅RT and participate in #BinanceSafetyThursday test, the first 10,000 users will share a reward of 50,000 USDT 👉立即参与
CAKE goes out every day with the money from the treasury, accompanied by a group of beautiful women. The main thing is that every time he goes out, he sets up a stall... No wonder they all call him the kitchen; every day is a stall... I really can't understand $CAKE
NYSE-listed company invests $100 million to buy INJ! I followed the investment and feel secure every day!
As an ordinary person, I'm now afraid of stepping into pitfalls no matter what I invest in. Either it's an unknown small platform that isn't reliable, or it's a project with no backing that collapses at any moment. It's too difficult to find a stable way to invest my spare money! Until I heard about the New York Stock Exchange-listed company Pineapple Financial, which specifically raised $100 million in digital assets for Injective and has been crazily buying INJ in the public market. I decisively invested a bit, and now every day when I open the app, I feel great! Why dare to follow public companies to invest? The NYSE's "golden signboard" is reliable to the core!
Ethereum is done, just short it for the long term, all profits have been taken by the second layer chains. Although users are increasing, they are all going to the second layer chains. Because it is necessary to go from the first layer, Ethereum shows an increase in users. The finances of the second layer and the first layer are separate, so Ethereum will only continue to degrade. In the past year, one could still earn billions, but now there aren't even a billion left. Holding short positions doesn't make one anxious $ETH
I am very curious about the TRX user group. With an annual transaction fee of 3.3 billion and 2.9 billion transactions, it averages to 1 yuan per transaction. Binance's public chain costs only a few cents per transaction, with only 5.9 billion transactions in a year. What are you doing on the TRX public chain? Is 1 yuan per transaction still cheap? Or is everything above EVM? After all, there are only 16 million monthly active users, and it is indeed difficult to achieve this transaction volume $TRX
Gold VS Bitcoin: The Financial Dark War Between China and the United States
Gold breaks through 1,000 yuan/gram, A-shares firmly hold 3,800 points, local government bonds surge by 41.9%. Behind the fluctuations in global financial markets, a 'value anchor competition' led by China and the United States is unfolding. China is hoarding gold to solidify its monetary foundation, while the U.S. is spending lavishly on Bitcoin to create digital hegemony. The investment showdown between tokenized gold and Bitcoin is a microcosm of this great power game. What strategic ambitions lie behind the suspenseful layout? How should ordinary people position themselves? China's 'Gold Hoarding Chess Game': Using 355 tons of gold to support a dual safety cushion for currency and economy
ASTER, this coin, regardless of how much CZ supports it and how many people are optimistic about it, I am not optimistic about it at all. There is fundamentally no financial backing to support its market value. Aren't you curious? Hundreds of peers in decentralized exchanges have been struggling for years without success, yet as soon as they start, they are valued in the hundreds of billions. Which financial information is real? They spent 2 billion on marketing in a few months; how high is the actual user retention on the platform they built? And that HYPE, do you really believe the superficial data provided by the project party? My last investment project collapsed because of financial fraud! Don't just look at superficial data; consider whether it aligns with basic logic. A new project coming up should not be equivalent to ten years of effort from an old project. This might happen, but it shouldn't be that several come out at once $ASTER $HYPE $MYX
Binance 40x leverage defaults! 5 institutions dumping 5 million GAIB, is the project worth it?
The GAIB/USDT 40x perpetual contract, originally scheduled to launch on November 20, has been officially announced by Binance as delayed, with no restart time given to date. The core reason cannot be hidden: five external institutions openly defaulted, collectively dumping tokens on the project launch day (TGE) with each selling 1 million tokens, totaling 5 million tokens flooding the market, directly causing the price collapse and raising concerns about the project's stability for Binance, leading to the postponement of the contract launch plan. How severe was this wave of default selling pressure? GAIB was initially priced close to $0.2 at launch, but within just three days, it plummeted by 62%, hitting a low of $0.052, catching many early investors off guard. According to the agreement, these institutions' tokens were supposed to be used for activity incentives and were strictly prohibited from early sales, yet they chose to 'dump' at the launch point. Although GAIB's official team has issued a notice demanding buybacks and accountability, no clear response has been received to date, forcing them to initiate a buyback plan to stabilize the market. Binance originally intended to boost liquidity with the contract launch, but faced with this sudden selling pressure and in order to mitigate market risks, they naturally chose to delay the launch, as no one wants to pay for the consequences of institutional defaults.