roko0905

According to Cointelegraph, Polish lawmakers have reignited the debate over cryptocurrency regulation by reintroducing a comprehensive crypto bill, following its rejection by President Karol Nawrocki. This move has heightened tensions between Nawrocki and Prime Minister Donald Tusk. The bill, known as Bill 2050, was presented by Polska2050, a member of the ruling coalition in Poland's Sejm, just days after Nawrocki vetoed a similar proposal. Despite claims from supporters like Adam Gomoła that the new bill is an "improved" version of the vetoed Bill 1424, government spokesman Adam Szłapka stated that "not even a comma" had been altered.The controversy surrounding Poland's crypto legislation unfolds as the European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) is being implemented across member states, with a compliance deadline set for July 2026. Critics argue that Bill 2050 is essentially a replica of the original Bill 1424, aiming to establish the Polish Financial Supervision Authority as the primary regulator for the country's crypto asset market. Polish politician Tomasz Mentzen has criticized the previous bill as "118 pages of overregulation," especially when compared to shorter versions in other EU countries like Hungary and Romania. Mentzen expressed his disapproval on social media, mocking Tusk's assertion that the president's veto was linked to alleged "Russian mafia" involvement, and sarcastically remarked that "the bill is perfect, and anyone who thinks otherwise is funded by Putin."Government spokesman Szłapka suggested that President Nawrocki might not veto the bill this time, following a classified security briefing in parliament that reportedly provided him with comprehensive insights into the national security implications. The debate over Poland's crypto bill is significant as it sets a precedent for the implementation of the EU-wide MiCA regulation, which proposes local financial regulators take charge of market supervision. This issue is particularly relevant amid calls from some EU member states for more centralized oversight under the Paris-based European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA).In October, the Bank of France advocated for granting ESMA direct supervisory powers, warning that fragmented oversight could jeopardize the EU's financial sovereignty. However, some member states, including Malta, have resisted centralized oversight, arguing that it could introduce additional layers of supervision that might hinder market innovation. Polish economist Krzysztof Piech, a vocal critic of Poland's proposed crypto bill, has questioned the necessity of local legislation, noting that MiCA protections will be in place by 2026. While local reports indicate that Nawrocki may not veto the bill this time, there is speculation that his office has been presented with an "alternative" draft aimed at fostering more favorable market conditions. This alternative proposal reportedly seeks to align with the EU-wide MiCA framework and remove direct oversight from the local regulator.

Bitcoin’s rebound from last week’s multi-month low is losing steam near the $92,000 mark, but analysts say the short-term trend still favors the upside — if buyers can regain key levels and restore market participation.Bitcoin is trading around $91,400, consolidating within a narrow band after climbing more than 13% from its $80,000 bottom.Bitcoin Must Reclaim $94K–$95K to Flip the TrendBTC has spent the past several days in a tight range between $90,300 and $92,000, according to TradingView data.Swissblock, a private wealth manager, says the real breakdown began when Bitcoin lost its yearly open at $93,300, calling it a “true trend shift.”The firm now identifies two critical zones:• Defensive zone: $83,000–$85,000BTC must hold this area to prevent a deeper correction.• Reversal zone: $94,000–$95,000Only a clean reclaim of this range would flip the trend bullish again.Glassnode’s cost-basis heatmap reinforces this view. Roughly 500,000 BTC were accumulated between $93,000 and $96,000, forming a dense supply cluster that must be absorbed before Bitcoin can regain momentum.The next major barrier sits between $100,000 and $108,000, where new buyers from the last peak are likely to sell into strength.Glassnode summarized the setup:“Breaking above the top-buyers’ supply clusters is a key prerequisite for regaining momentum toward a new all-time high.”Spot Volume Weakens as Transfer Activity Falls 20%Price alone is not the obstacle. Participation is.Bitcoin’s on-chain transfer volume declined nearly 20% this week to $87 billion (7-day MA), showing weaker economic activity on the network.Spot exchange trading volume has fallen to $12.8 billion, well below the surges that historically accompanied breakout rallies.Notably, BTC’s push back above $91,000 happened without a corresponding rise in spot activity, signaling reduced investor appetite and limited speculative energy.This divergence suggests Bitcoin lacks the trading momentum required to clear the $92,000–$95,000 resistance band.CVD Signals Early Signs of RecoveryDespite sluggish spot volume, market structure may be shifting.Glassnode data shows that Bitcoin’s taker cumulative volume delta (CVD) — an indicator of aggressive buying vs. selling — has moved back toward neutral after spending weeks in negative territory.If CVD turns decisively buyer-dominant, analysts expect a recovery phase similar to May–July, when BTC climbed 32% to its former all-time high of $123,000.What Bitcoin Must Do NextFor Bitcoin to avoid another sharp drawdown and re-establish a path toward six-figure prices, three conditions must align:Reclaim $94,000–$95,000 to confirm a trend reversal.Break $97,000–$98,000, which traders see as the first true confirmation zone.Witness a decisive return of spot market volume supporting a move to $100,000.Until then, Bitcoin remains range-bound and vulnerable to renewed selling pressure.

$XRP A significant on-chain movement of XRP reported by blockchain monitoring platform Whale Alert has caught attention due to both its scale and its origin. According to the report, 150 million XRP was moved to an unidentified wallet.The transfer, valued at approximately 317 million USD at the time of execution, was recorded on November 24, 2025, and classified as originating from a wallet linked to Ripple.Although transfers of this magnitude are not unprecedented, they often attract scrutiny because of the influence such movements can have on perceptions of corporate activity, treasury management, and liquidity conditions.👉Details of the TransactionThe transaction was executed on the XRP Ledger with a minimal fee of 0.0004 units, consistent with the network’s low-cost design. Whale Alert’s post listed the transfer as “from Ripple to unknown wallet,” indicating that the receiving address is not publicly identified or labelled within major tracking systems.Transfers from known institutional or corporate wallets to unlabeled accounts typically raise questions about the underlying purpose, especially when involving hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of tokens. At the moment the transfer was detected, the asset was priced at approximately 2.1265 USD, placing the total value at just over 317 million USD.👉Potential Interpretations Behind the MovementAlthough the alert does not explain the transaction’s intent, several common scenarios may apply. One possibility is that this represents an internal treasury operation, such as shifting assets between custodial environments, redistributing holdings for security purposes, or preparing reserves for corporate activities.These kinds of transfers often occur without external announcements. The receiving wallet may be part of Ripple’s broader internal infrastructure, even if not publicly labeled as such.Another plausible interpretation is that the tokens were moved to a custody partner or institutional entity. Large asset managers, financial institutions, or liquidity providers sometimes receive high-value transfers. Such movements may precede operational uses. Without an exchange tag or identifiable institutional label on the receiving account, the purpose remains unclear.A further possibility is that the transfer could be associated with over-the-counter arrangements. OTC activity is often conducted using wallets that are not publicly associated with exchanges, and high-value transfers may occur without immediate reflection on open market order books. In these cases, the size of the movement does not necessarily imply imminent market impact.👉Market and Ledger ContextThere has been no indication from public data that the transfer immediately preceded unusual price movement or abnormal liquidity shifts on major trading venues.Additionally, on-chain metrics are yet to display a pattern of redistribution from the receiving address, though this may change as further ledger activity develops. As with similar movements in the past, the absence of a clear label for the destination wallet means that definitive conclusions cannot be drawn solely from the alert.🚀🚀🚀 FOLLOW BE_MASTER BUY_SMART 💰💰💰Appreciate the work. 😍 Thank You. 👍 FOLLOW BeMaster BuySmart 🚀 TO FIND OUT MORE $$$$$ 🤩 BE MASTER BUY SMART 💰🤩🚀🚀🚀 PLEASE CLICK FOLLOW BE MASTER BUY SMART - Thank You.