首页
通知
个人主页
热门文章
新闻
收藏与点赞
历史记录
创作者中心
设置
Dr Nohawn
--
关注
⭐⭐每个周期奖励那些在他人消失时坚持的人。⭐⭐
⭐保持冷静 - 保持乐观⭐
✨诺汉博士✨
红包有奖问答
到期时间
2025-12-13 08:04:31
Key to Success??
输入答案
已过期
免责声明:含第三方意见,不构成财务建议,并且可能包含赞助内容。
详见《条款和条件》。
2.7k
0
浏览最新的加密货币新闻
⚡️ 参与加密货币领域的最新讨论
💬 与喜爱的创作者互动
👍 查看感兴趣的内容
邮箱/手机号码
注册
登录
相关创作者
Dr Nohawn
@Flicky123Nohawn
关注
创作者的更多内容
The Paraswap → CoW Swap switch on aave.com wasn’t just a routine product update — it exposed a deeper fault line inside Aave. Delegates are questioning whether swap fees that once flowed to the DAO treasury are now accruing to Aave Labs, reigniting a long-standing debate over who actually controls value capture in the ecosystem. For years, the line between protocol and product stayed comfortably blurry. That ambiguity no longer holds. If more value continues to migrate toward the interface layer, then a harder question emerges: what does holding $AAVE really represent — governance over a protocol, or exposure to an ecosystem where value is increasingly captured elsewhere? This debate isn’t just about fees. It’s about alignment.
--
Reports suggest that $OM’s sharp rally earlier this year may have been driven by a fragile liquidity loop, rather than sustained organic demand. According to market chatter, accounts linked to market makers allegedly used $OM as collateral to borrow USDT, then recycled that liquidity back into the market to continue buying $OM. The structure held as long as those accounts could keep accessing leverage. Once exchanges reportedly restricted those accounts, the buy-side pressure disappeared — and $OM fell roughly 82% in a single week. Some traders are drawing parallels to $SAHARA , where similar rumors circulated about market maker restrictions being followed by a rapid collapse. While these claims remain unconfirmed, the broader lesson is familiar: when price action relies on circular liquidity instead of real demand, the unwind is usually brutal.
--
The market tests conviction before it prints rewards. Dr.Nohawn
--
Rumors are circulating that a Hollywood director got badly rekt in crypto — and this one comes with real consequences. Carl Rinsch, director of 47 Ronin starring Keanu Reeves, reportedly didn’t just lose money — he lost other people’s money. According to reports, Rinsch blew $11M of Netflix production funds on crypto speculation and luxury spending, derailing the project and severely damaging his reputation. The episode is a harsh reminder that crypto isn’t just volatile — it’s addictive, unforgiving, and ruthless, especially without discipline or risk control. If this story proves anything, it’s that no one is immune to getting rekt — fame included.
--
Grayscale Questions Bitcoin’s 4-Year Cycle Grayscale is beginning to push back on the idea that Bitcoin still follows a strict four-year cycle. In a new report, the firm argues that recent cycles never produced a true parabolic blow-off top, suggesting Bitcoin’s market structure is changing. The rise of ETPs and Digital Asset Treasuries (DATs) has brought in longer-term capital, dampening volatility and stretching out the traditional cycle timeline. Grayscale also points to a structurally bullish macro backdrop. Ongoing fiscal deficits and persistent currency debasement continue to favor scarce assets like Bitcoin, supporting demand beyond speculative phases. The implication is a shift in behavior: instead of sharp, emotional tops, Bitcoin may grind higher over a longer period. In that framework, major new highs could arrive closer to 2026, rather than following the usual post-halving surge. If true, the cycle isn’t dead — it’s evolving. #Grayscale
--
实时新闻
Prysm 团队发布以太坊主网事故复盘报告
--
蚂蚁国际通过区块链与AI重塑全球资金管理体系
--
Revolut 在 EVM 链上的稳定币流入量显著增加,达 2.91 亿美元
--
USDC 流通量增加 5 亿枚,储备资产价值约 787 亿美元
--
NYDIG研究主管:代币化资产长期价值有望释放
--
查看更多
热门文章
币安alpha将于最近关闭,让位于aster?
阿饼123
台积电赴美建厂困局,西方官僚主义的致命桎梏。 《纽约时报》对台积电亚利桑那建厂难题的深度披露,成为透视西方官僚主义积
魔怔姐兔子
ETH要掀桌子巨鲸悄悄“囤货”信号拉满,我的独家判断来了.
洋洋说币
2025年12月14日,星期日,农历十月廿五 60秒早间阅读 1、2025年度中国电影总票房已突破500亿元,其中全年
芊羽Angel
2026年,最重要的是学会做波段。 大家发现没有,好多过去的经验都行不通了,特别是 “现货不怕” 好多人死拿现货,亏
K线人生飞哥
查看更多
网站地图
Cookie偏好设置
平台条款和条件