Binance Square
Klim s777
285 Posts

Klim s777

194 Following
49 Followers
88 Liked
Posts
·
--
Article
Where does the real risk lie in the Bedrock ecosystem?#bedrock $BR When discussing BTCFi, the conversation almost always boils down to yield. Some look at APY, others compare protocols by TVL, and others assess the potential growth of the ecosystem. However, behind all these metrics, a more important question often gets lost. Where exactly is the risk?

Where does the real risk lie in the Bedrock ecosystem?

#bedrock $BR
When discussing BTCFi, the conversation almost always boils down to yield. Some look at APY, others compare protocols by TVL, and others assess the potential growth of the ecosystem. However, behind all these metrics, a more important question often gets lost.
Where exactly is the risk?
Article
Who is actually financing the growth of Bedrock?When discussing @Bedrock , attention is usually focused on TVL, BTCFi, uniBTC, or the prospects of $BR. But while studying the project's tokenomics, I became interested in another question. Who is actually financing the growth of the Bedrock ecosystem? Most users perceive the token solely as a trading asset. The price goes up or down, investors buy or short the asset. However, in the case of Bedrock, a significant portion of the issuance serves a completely different function.

Who is actually financing the growth of Bedrock?

When discussing @Bedrock , attention is usually focused on TVL, BTCFi, uniBTC, or the prospects of $BR. But while studying the project's tokenomics, I became interested in another question.
Who is actually financing the growth of the Bedrock ecosystem?
Most users perceive the token solely as a trading asset. The price goes up or down, investors buy or short the asset. However, in the case of Bedrock, a significant portion of the issuance serves a completely different function.
Article
The Most Underrated Feature of Bedrock 2.0When talking about @Bedrock , the conversation almost always boils down to Bitcoin, BTCFi, or the prospects of $BR. But after diving into the protocol's architecture, I got curious about another question. Why did Bedrock decide to develop several directions instead of fully focusing on Bitcoin?

The Most Underrated Feature of Bedrock 2.0

When talking about @Bedrock , the conversation almost always boils down to Bitcoin, BTCFi, or the prospects of $BR.
But after diving into the protocol's architecture, I got curious about another question.
Why did Bedrock decide to develop several directions instead of fully focusing on Bitcoin?
Article
What will happen to Bedrock if the token $BR is removed from the ecosystem?This question seems odd because most discussions around @Bedrock focus on the token's price, yield, or the prospects of BTCFi. However, from an architectural standpoint, it's far more important to understand why BR even exists within the protocol. Bedrock operates simultaneously with several types of assets. The ecosystem includes uniBTC, uniETH, and uniIOTX. Each of these assets has its own liquidity, users, yield strategies, and risks.

What will happen to Bedrock if the token $BR is removed from the ecosystem?

This question seems odd because most discussions around @Bedrock focus on the token's price, yield, or the prospects of BTCFi.
However, from an architectural standpoint, it's far more important to understand why BR even exists within the protocol.
Bedrock operates simultaneously with several types of assets. The ecosystem includes uniBTC, uniETH, and uniIOTX. Each of these assets has its own liquidity, users, yield strategies, and risks.
Article
19 Networks Bedrock: Infrastructure for Scaling BTCFi Many are mentioning that it supports operations across 19 blockchain networks and has over 60 partner integrations. However, for BTCFi, this isn't just a scale indicator of the ecosystem. The main goal of Bedrock 2.0 is to boost Bitcoin's efficiency within DeFi. To achieve this, the protocol issues liquid assets, including uniBTC, which should be usable across various ecosystems simultaneously.

19 Networks Bedrock: Infrastructure for Scaling BTCFi



Many are mentioning that it supports operations across 19 blockchain networks and has over 60 partner integrations. However, for BTCFi, this isn't just a scale indicator of the ecosystem.
The main goal of Bedrock 2.0 is to boost Bitcoin's efficiency within DeFi. To achieve this, the protocol issues liquid assets, including uniBTC, which should be usable across various ecosystems simultaneously.
Article
veBR and Long-Term Management: An Unconventional Approach of Bedrock 2.0As I dive into the materials @Bedrock , I'm increasingly realizing that one of the most intriguing aspects of Bedrock 2.0 isn't just the evolution of BTCFi or the new opportunities for leveraging Bitcoin in DeFi. What's even more fascinating is the project's approach to managing the ecosystem through the veBR mechanism.

veBR and Long-Term Management: An Unconventional Approach of Bedrock 2.0

As I dive into the materials @Bedrock , I'm increasingly realizing that one of the most intriguing aspects of Bedrock 2.0 isn't just the evolution of BTCFi or the new opportunities for leveraging Bitcoin in DeFi. What's even more fascinating is the project's approach to managing the ecosystem through the veBR mechanism.
Article
Invisible Infrastructure: Where the Crypto Market is Headed Studying the materials , I caught myself thinking unexpectedly. Most talks about crypto revolve around investment decisions: Which token to buy.. Where to enter.. When to take profits.. But the deeper you dive into the market, the clearer another picture emerges. A huge amount of time is spent not on making investment decisions, but on the infrastructure - You need to choose the network;

Invisible Infrastructure: Where the Crypto Market is Headed



Studying the materials
, I caught myself thinking unexpectedly. Most talks about crypto revolve around investment decisions:
Which token to buy..
Where to enter..
When to take profits..
But the deeper you dive into the market, the clearer another picture emerges. A huge amount of time is spent not on making investment decisions, but on the infrastructure - You need to choose the network;
#genius $GENIUS A strange thing happened while I was studying @GeniusOfficial . The more I read about $GENIUS, the lessI found myself thinking about blockchains. That sounds wrong at first. Crypto has spent years arguing about blockchains. Ethereum versus Solana. L1 versus L2. Fast chains. Cheap chains. Modular chains. Yet most traders are not trying to buy a blockchain. They are trying to buy an asset. Somewhere along the way, the industry started forcing users to care about things that were supposed to stay behind the scenes. Networks. Bridges. Approvals. Gas. Liquidity routes. According to the public materials behind #Genius , the long-term direction is surprisingly simple: remove as much of that operational complexity as possible. The trader decides what to do. The infrastructure figures out how to do it. Maybe that is the real significance of projects like @GeniusOfficial. Not that they add another layer to crypto. But that they slowly make existing layers disappear from view. The most interesting possibility is that future traders may spend less time learning blockchains and more time making decisions. And if that happens, much of today's crypto expertise may become invisible infrastructure itself.
#genius $GENIUS
A strange thing happened while I was studying @GeniusOfficial .
The more I read about $GENIUS , the lessI found myself thinking about blockchains.
That sounds wrong at first.
Crypto has spent years arguing about blockchains.
Ethereum versus Solana.
L1 versus L2.
Fast chains. Cheap chains. Modular chains.
Yet most traders are not trying to buy a blockchain.
They are trying to buy an asset.
Somewhere along the way, the industry started forcing users to care about things that were supposed to stay behind the scenes.
Networks.
Bridges.
Approvals.
Gas.
Liquidity routes.
According to the public materials behind #Genius , the long-term direction is surprisingly simple: remove as much of that operational complexity as possible.
The trader decides what to do.
The infrastructure figures out how to do it.
Maybe that is the real significance of projects like @GeniusOfficial.
Not that they add another layer to crypto.
But that they slowly make existing layers disappear from view.
The most interesting possibility is that future traders may spend less time learning blockchains and more time making decisions.
And if that happens, much of today's crypto expertise may become invisible infrastructure itself.
Article
Why does the same token have different prices on different DEXs?Before dropping another post about liquidity aggregators, it's crucial to grasp why the problem they aim to tackle even exists. Many people think a token's price should be uniform everywhere. In practice, that's not the case. The same asset can trade at different prices across various DEXs simultaneously. The reason is that each exchange has its own liquidity pool. When someone buys or sells a token, the price shifts only within that specific pool, not across the entire ecosystem at once.

Why does the same token have different prices on different DEXs?

Before dropping another post about liquidity aggregators, it's crucial to grasp why the problem they aim to tackle even exists.
Many people think a token's price should be uniform everywhere. In practice, that's not the case.
The same asset can trade at different prices across various DEXs simultaneously. The reason is that each exchange has its own liquidity pool. When someone buys or sells a token, the price shifts only within that specific pool, not across the entire ecosystem at once.
Article
Why Bedrock appeared before the BTCFi boomToday, BTCFi stands out as one of the hottest topics in the crypto market. Many projects started actively rolling out Bitcoin products only after the trend gained traction. So I got curious about when exactly @Bedrock popped up. Turns out, the first products of the ecosystem launched way before the current BTCFi boom. Back then, the market was all about Ethereum, liquid staking, and the growth of the ETH ecosystem. That's when uniETH emerged and the first Bedrock solutions for liquid restaking came into play.

Why Bedrock appeared before the BTCFi boom

Today, BTCFi stands out as one of the hottest topics in the crypto market. Many projects started actively rolling out Bitcoin products only after the trend gained traction.
So I got curious about when exactly @Bedrock popped up.
Turns out, the first products of the ecosystem launched way before the current BTCFi boom. Back then, the market was all about Ethereum, liquid staking, and the growth of the ETH ecosystem. That's when uniETH emerged and the first Bedrock solutions for liquid restaking came into play.
#genius $GENIUS @GeniusOfficial gives access to over 500 DEX across more than 10 blockchains. Initially, it was mentioned that there were 150-300 DEX, but later CEO Armaan Kalsi talked about 500+ DEX. In January 2026, weekly trading volume skyrocketed from $85 million to over $2 billion. Before the end of the first season, participants were awarded 200 million Genius Points (GP). The GP system included eight levels of leverage. The distribution amount depended on the accumulated GP. For every $100 of spot volume, 1 GP was earned. For every $1000 of perpetual contract volume, 1 GP was also awarded. Before the TGE, there was a pool of 200 million GP for ecosystem participants @GeniusOfficial. The TGE took place on April 13, 2026. At launch, approximately 335 million tokens were in circulation, or 33.5% of the total supply. The total issuance is 1 billion tokens. The inflation mechanism has not been disclosed. As part of the first airdrop, 70 million tokens were distributed through the Genius Foundation. The investment from YZi Labs was described as a multi-8-figure investment. By January 2026, the total trading volume of @GeniusOfficial surpassed $3 billion. Ghost Orders allows for distributing large orders among 500 wallets.
#genius $GENIUS

@GeniusOfficial gives access to over 500 DEX across more than 10 blockchains. Initially, it was mentioned that there were 150-300 DEX, but later CEO Armaan Kalsi talked about 500+ DEX. In January 2026, weekly trading volume skyrocketed from $85 million to over $2 billion.
Before the end of the first season, participants were awarded 200 million Genius Points (GP). The GP system included eight levels of leverage. The distribution amount depended on the accumulated GP. For every $100 of spot volume, 1 GP was earned. For every $1000 of perpetual contract volume, 1 GP was also awarded. Before the TGE, there was a pool of 200 million GP for ecosystem participants @GeniusOfficial.
The TGE took place on April 13, 2026. At launch, approximately 335 million tokens were in circulation, or 33.5% of the total supply. The total issuance is 1 billion tokens. The inflation mechanism has not been disclosed. As part of the first airdrop, 70 million tokens were distributed through the Genius Foundation.
The investment from YZi Labs was described as a multi-8-figure investment. By January 2026, the total trading volume of @GeniusOfficial surpassed $3 billion. Ghost Orders allows for distributing large orders among 500 wallets.
#bedrock $BR Bitcoin remains the largest source of untapped capital in the crypto industry. Trillions of dollars worth are stored in BTC. Most of this capital isn't participating in lending, liquidity, or other DeFi mechanisms. Against this backdrop, @Bedrock tackles a problem that seems far more important than the yield and price of $BR. How can you turn Bitcoin into working capital without having to sell the Bitcoin itself? This is where the true BTCFi sector begins. Not new tokens. Not new blockchains. Not another liquidity battle. The fight is for the most scarce digital asset in the world. Every protocol wants to draw Bitcoin into its own infrastructure. Every new BTC boosts liquidity, volume, and the ecosystem's influence. So today, the competition is no longer between users. The competition is between infrastructures. Who can offer BTC holders enough reasons to make their capital work? The answer to this question will determine not just the future of #Bedrock. It will define which portion of the global Bitcoin capital remains passive and which becomes part of the new financial system.
#bedrock $BR

Bitcoin remains the largest source of untapped capital in the crypto industry.
Trillions of dollars worth are stored in BTC. Most of this capital isn't participating in lending, liquidity, or other DeFi mechanisms.
Against this backdrop, @Bedrock tackles a problem that seems far more important than the yield and price of $BR.
How can you turn Bitcoin into working capital without having to sell the Bitcoin itself?
This is where the true BTCFi sector begins.
Not new tokens.
Not new blockchains.
Not another liquidity battle.
The fight is for the most scarce digital asset in the world.
Every protocol wants to draw Bitcoin into its own infrastructure.
Every new BTC boosts liquidity, volume, and the ecosystem's influence.
So today, the competition is no longer between users.
The competition is between infrastructures.
Who can offer BTC holders enough reasons to make their capital work?
The answer to this question will determine not just the future of #Bedrock.
It will define which portion of the global Bitcoin capital remains passive and which becomes part of the new financial system.
#bedrock $BR I'm amazed by one thing going on around BTCFi. Almost everyone is talking about yields. Almost no one is discussing the competition for Bitcoin itself. In traditional finance, banks compete for customers' money. In crypto, a similar situation is gradually unfolding. Every new protocol wants access to the same BTC. Before, Bitcoin just sat in the wallets of its holders. Now, various ecosystems are starting to compete for that capital. Some offer liquidity. Others provide restaking. Some offer new reward models. In fact, Bitcoin is starting to become a strategic resource for the entire DeFi market. That's why I look at @Bedrock a bit differently. I'm not interested in yield size or the price of $BR. What's way more interesting is whether #Bedrock can attract and hold a portion of the world’s Bitcoin capital within its own infrastructure. If you look at it from this angle, many BTCFi projects stop being competitors for users. They become competitors for the same Bitcoin. And that's a whole different game. Because the number of protocols can grow infinitely. The amount of Bitcoin will remain limited forever.
#bedrock $BR

I'm amazed by one thing going on around BTCFi.
Almost everyone is talking about yields.
Almost no one is discussing the competition for Bitcoin itself.
In traditional finance, banks compete for customers' money.
In crypto, a similar situation is gradually unfolding.
Every new protocol wants access to the same BTC.
Before, Bitcoin just sat in the wallets of its holders.
Now, various ecosystems are starting to compete for that capital.
Some offer liquidity.
Others provide restaking.
Some offer new reward models.
In fact, Bitcoin is starting to become a strategic resource for the entire DeFi market.
That's why I look at @Bedrock a bit differently.
I'm not interested in yield size or the price of $BR.
What's way more interesting is whether #Bedrock can attract and hold a portion of the world’s Bitcoin capital within its own infrastructure.
If you look at it from this angle, many BTCFi projects stop being competitors for users.
They become competitors for the same Bitcoin.
And that's a whole different game.
Because the number of protocols can grow infinitely.
The amount of Bitcoin will remain limited forever.
In the past, competition between exchanges was all about fees, liquidity, and the number of trading pairs. Today, there's a new challenge. Users can access hundreds of DEXs and dozens of blockchains, but they're often left to navigate swapping routes, compare prices, and transfer assets between networks on their own. This is the problem that @GeniusOfficial is tackling. The project is building a unified trading terminal for different blockchains and liquidity sources. Users see a single entry point. Behind the terminal are dozens of networks, DEXs, and execution routes. In my opinion, the most interesting part here isn't the execution speed or the interface. What's more important is the approach. In traditional DeFi, a person has to adapt to the infrastructure. Genius is trying to flip that. The infrastructure should adapt to the user. If this model proves successful, it won't be the number of connected networks that matters, but the quality of their integration into one system. That's why I view $GENIUS not as just another trading token, but as an attempt to build an infrastructure layer between the user and the increasingly complex world of DeFi. #genius $GENIUS
In the past, competition between exchanges was all about fees, liquidity, and the number of trading pairs. Today, there's a new challenge. Users can access hundreds of DEXs and dozens of blockchains, but they're often left to navigate swapping routes, compare prices, and transfer assets between networks on their own.
This is the problem that @GeniusOfficial is tackling.
The project is building a unified trading terminal for different blockchains and liquidity sources. Users see a single entry point. Behind the terminal are dozens of networks, DEXs, and execution routes.
In my opinion, the most interesting part here isn't the execution speed or the interface. What's more important is the approach. In traditional DeFi, a person has to adapt to the infrastructure. Genius is trying to flip that. The infrastructure should adapt to the user.
If this model proves successful, it won't be the number of connected networks that matters, but the quality of their integration into one system.
That's why I view $GENIUS not as just another trading token, but as an attempt to build an infrastructure layer between the user and the increasingly complex world of DeFi.

#genius $GENIUS
When you dive into @GeniusOfficial , you start to notice one weird thing. Most DeFi protocols treat the wallet as the heart of the system. Want to swap a token? Sign off. Want to use a bridge? Sign off. Want to add liquidity? Sign off. Want to open a position? Sign off again. As a result, users aren't really trading; they're stuck in an endless loop of confirmations. Genius offers a different approach. The focus isn't on the wallet, but rather on the trading session. Users set their parameters up front. After that, the terminal executes allowed actions within established limits. Essentially, the project aims to separate decision-making from technical execution. It might look like a minor tweak in the interface, but it actually changes the logic of working with DeFi. A person makes a decision once. The infrastructure handles the rest. That's why I feel that the main idea behind $GENIUS is not just about trading or liquidity routing. The project seeks to remove the wallet from the center of the user experience and highlight the end result instead of the process of achieving it. #genius $GENIUS
When you dive into @GeniusOfficial , you start to notice one weird thing. Most DeFi protocols treat the wallet as the heart of the system. Want to swap a token? Sign off. Want to use a bridge? Sign off. Want to add liquidity? Sign off. Want to open a position? Sign off again. As a result, users aren't really trading; they're stuck in an endless loop of confirmations. Genius offers a different approach. The focus isn't on the wallet, but rather on the trading session. Users set their parameters up front. After that, the terminal executes allowed actions within established limits. Essentially, the project aims to separate decision-making from technical execution. It might look like a minor tweak in the interface, but it actually changes the logic of working with DeFi. A person makes a decision once. The infrastructure handles the rest. That's why I feel that the main idea behind $GENIUS is not just about trading or liquidity routing. The project seeks to remove the wallet from the center of the user experience and highlight the end result instead of the process of achieving it.

#genius $GENIUS
uniBTC and uniETH are the flagship products of the ecosystem @Bedrock . This raises another question: what role does the token $BR play in the system and why is it even needed by holders #Bedrock ? According to the documentation, token holders can participate in protocol governance. This is done using the veBR model. Users lock up tokens for a certain period and gain the right to participate in votes. But here's the interesting part. If the token is removed from the system, uniBTC, uniETH, brBTC, Babylon, and EigenLayer will continue to operate. Therefore, the primary value of the project today lies not in the token, but in the infrastructure of liquid restaking. Essentially, a buyer of BR is betting on the growth of the entire ecosystem. The more users leverage Bedrock's products, the more significant the token's role becomes in the protocol's governance mechanisms. #bedrock $BR
uniBTC and uniETH are the flagship products of the ecosystem @Bedrock . This raises another question: what role does the token $BR play in the system and why is it even needed by holders #Bedrock ?
According to the documentation, token holders can participate in protocol governance. This is done using the veBR model. Users lock up tokens for a certain period and gain the right to participate in votes.
But here's the interesting part. If the token is removed from the system, uniBTC, uniETH, brBTC, Babylon, and EigenLayer will continue to operate. Therefore, the primary value of the project today lies not in the token, but in the infrastructure of liquid restaking.
Essentially, a buyer of BR is betting on the growth of the entire ecosystem. The more users leverage Bedrock's products, the more significant the token's role becomes in the protocol's governance mechanisms.
#bedrock $BR
GENIUS is trying to make DeFi as user-friendly as Binance, while keeping assets under user control and adding tools for stealth execution of large trades. While exploring @GeniusOfficial and the $GENIUS token, I concluded that the main product of the project today is the trading terminal #genius , not the token itself. Users of decentralized exchanges are constantly switching between networks in search of the right DEX. They need to hunt for the best price, use bridges to transfer assets, confirm actions through their wallets, and monitor several interfaces simultaneously. The terminal is connected to more than 150 decentralized exchanges and operates across multiple blockchains. Instead of navigating through different networks to find the best trade route, the user sees a single interface and sends one command. Imagine a massive trading mall. Inside are Uniswap, PancakeSwap, Aerodrome, Raydium, Orca, and hundreds of other platforms. GENIUS shops around all these stores for the user, searching for where the best price is right now. I consider the standout feature of the project to be Ghost Orders, which I'll discuss in the next post. Subscribe so you don't miss anything and to learn more. #genius $GENIUS
GENIUS is trying to make DeFi as user-friendly as Binance, while keeping assets under user control and adding tools for stealth execution of large trades.
While exploring @GeniusOfficial and the $GENIUS token, I concluded that the main product of the project today is the trading terminal #genius , not the token itself.
Users of decentralized exchanges are constantly switching between networks in search of the right DEX. They need to hunt for the best price, use bridges to transfer assets, confirm actions through their wallets, and monitor several interfaces simultaneously.
The terminal is connected to more than 150 decentralized exchanges and operates across multiple blockchains. Instead of navigating through different networks to find the best trade route, the user sees a single interface and sends one command.
Imagine a massive trading mall. Inside are Uniswap, PancakeSwap, Aerodrome, Raydium, Orca, and hundreds of other platforms. GENIUS shops around all these stores for the user, searching for where the best price is right now.
I consider the standout feature of the project to be Ghost Orders, which I'll discuss in the next post.
Subscribe so you don't miss anything and to learn more.

#genius $GENIUS
to assist project authors. I struggled for a long time trying to grasp the point system for articles. Turns out I was doing it all wrong - I was trying to formalize and fix my personal thoughts using AI. It seems that writing in my own words, even with mistakes, is valued much higher than the grammatically and phonetically polished style from AI.
to assist project authors. I struggled for a long time trying to grasp the point system for articles. Turns out I was doing it all wrong - I was trying to formalize and fix my personal thoughts using AI. It seems that writing in my own words, even with mistakes, is valued much higher than the grammatically and phonetically polished style from AI.
Binance Square Official
·
--
About CreatorPad: FAQ and T&Cs
Read More:Important Update to CreatorPad’s New Scoring SystemCreatorPad is Getting a Major Revamp!Introduction to the Open-Source Scoring Mechanism of the Binance Square CreatorPad Leaderboard
CreatorPad is a new monetization platform for Binance Square creators to earn rewards for high-quality content creation.

As of 2026-01-06, CreatorPad has updated the leaderboard system that tracks users’ content and measures the quality of the content produced. Completion of tasks will earn users points and the more points a user earns, the more rewards they will receive.

The new CreatorPad Points system serves to:
Give participants more visibility on their leaderboard rankingOffer more opportunities to climb the ranksIncrease transparency on how content is evaluated
Visit CreatorPad!
FAQs
1. About our Point System
How your content point is constituted?
QualityCore focus: Using an AI-powered model, the post is dissected into components and each is scored.ViewershipValid views and exposure of the content during the calculation window. EngagementNormal interactions (likes, comments, token clicks) from real users with real value.
Notes: 
The number of views and engagements shown from the frontend do not directly determine how many points received. Engagement farming will be detected and reach & engagement will be deprioritized. Content involving farming behavior, including comments and views will be reduced. You can share your content, reply to replies and drive engagement, but our system will know which are the true engagement from different users when they see your content recommended, and we encourage authentic sharing and comment.Views, likes, shares, or comments will not be counted multiple times. For example, if you like a content five times, it will only count as one.Truthful content based on real personal experience, thoughtful sharing and analysis is expected to receive higher points. What matters is quality content (not spammy, not entirely AI-generated, and not repetitive), along with real engagement.Content generated entirely by AI will be de-boosted, and traffic will be allocated to content created organically on Square.The calculation window of the valid views/content is valid until 23:59 (UTC) on day T+1 since the content's initial publication. For example, if a user publishes his/her first content on May 20, 2026, at 17:00 (UTC), the calculation window will be from May 20, 2026, 17:00 (UTC) to May 21, 2026, 23:59 (UTC). 
How the model detects content quality?
The content is broken down into different parts: main context, visuals, and trading widgets. The model scans these elements and merges the analysis to ensure all are relevant.
It evaluates based on the following components, similar to a human reviewer:
Originality: Originality on CreatorPad is not just about avoiding copy-pasting from elsewhere; it’s about having a unique angle to analyze the project or token. Originality also considers how many similar pieces of content exist on the platform—the more identical they are, the lower the originality score for that topic.Relevance to the project: Does the content relate to the project or relevant talking points? If you only superficially mention what the campaign is about or spend too much time discussing irrelevant topics within the same content, it may increase the chance of receiving no points due to irrelevance.Visuals: Big logos only, obvious AI-generated pictures, or fake screenshots reduce the score. Sharing data points from truthful sources improves the credibility of your content.Trade sharing / PNL: Using our official trading widget to share real profit/loss screenshots or honest performance numbers relevant to the token adds huge credibility. Generic “moon” claims without proof hurt the score. Also, sharing irrelevant trades (e.g., talking about BNB but sharing ETH PNL) might impact your points negatively, even if it increases viewership.
Read More: Introduction to the Open-Source Scoring Mechanism of the Binance Square CreatorPad Leaderboard
What we are not looking for?
Completely unrelated content with zero mention of CreatorPad, Binance Square, or any campaign token.Click-bait using unrelated stories (celebrity drama, random memes) plus one line about the project at the end, or adding random selfies just for views.Pure trend predictions or trading signals with no “why” explanation (e.g., “Buy $XYZ now” without reasoning or data).When sharing a link to third-party content, always add your own analysis and context — never just drop a link.
How the model define AI?
the below response is generated by AI, please use that as a reference
Traits the model looks for to spot AI-generated content:
Uniform sentence length and overly polished, formal tone with zero personality.Repetitive structures (“In conclusion…”, “Furthermore…”) and generic filler.No personal stories, emotions, slang, or current real-time references.Perfect grammar/spelling with zero natural variation.Broad, safe opinions instead of specific, opinionated takes.
Specific details that indicate human writing:
Contractions (“I’m”, “it’s”), slang, emojis used naturally.Personal “I” statements with real experiences (“I just finished the DUSK tasks and…”, “My actual PNL this week…”).Minor natural imperfections, varied rhythm, unique insights or hot takes.References to something that happened today or a personal trading mistake
If I use AI to review my grammar, would it be defined as AI?
No. Using AI only for grammar/spelling fixes does not make the post AI-generated. The ideas, structure, opinions, and voice must still be yours. 
Non-eligible content and point reduction for lower quality content
We’ve introduced a new CreatorPad misconduct form for reporting creators or accounts you suspect of violating our Terms and Conditions, including using AI-generated content to unfairly farm rewards or engagement, or employing bots to manipulate campaign results. 
We will carefully review every report and will respond via your registered feed secretary within 7 days.
How can I see my points?  
You can check the breakdown of points earned for each task under the Square Points tab.
2. About our Leaderboard
Introducing Square Points
Square Points is a point system that ranks creators in leaderboards; to earn points, you can complete tasks under different project campaigns. It is a scoring system designed to evaluate user activity within Binance Square that determines the eligibility and ranking for different campaigns.
Square Points are calculated daily based on the sum of points from your content, engagement, and trades on Binance exchange (wallet excluded).Points summary would be updated on a T+2 on CreatorPad at 09:00 UTC.In project campaigns, the total points on the leaderboard are a cumulative sum of daily points over the campaign period.To check your daily points breakdown, click on the Project leaderboard and it will be displayed under “My Points” 
When will the leaderboard update?
The project leaderboard displays data with a T+2 delay. For example, data of 2026-03-20 will be shown on the leaderboard page after 2026-03-22 09:00 (UTC). The “leaderboard snapshot date” refers to the data cutoff date used to generate the leaderboard. The leaderboard data is calculated up to that date, and the leaderboard is displayed T+2 days after the data cutoff.
What is the the Project Leaderboard?
Project Leaderboard is a specialized ranking for creators working on a specific project. Only creators who’ve completed all the tasks for that project are eligible to be listed. Rankings are determined by the quality of content produced by each creator, with higher-quality content earning more points hence, better positions on the leaderboard.
3. About our Leaderboard Campaigns
How do I participate in the campaigns? How do I earn points?  
Check out the available campaigns on Creatorpad and complete the tasks. Each task has a fixed point value or tier-based points.
Tasks might include:
Posting about a project on Binance SquareUsing a specific hashtag or coin tagFollowing official project accountsMaking a trade on Binance
Why is my Square post task not verified? 
Ensure that all task requirements are met, all required tags will need to be highlighted in yellow for it to be eligible. Double check for spelling errors in hashtags and make sure to mention the right project account. 
When do daily tasks refresh?
Daily tasks that are ongoing and refresh daily until the end of the campaign, reset at 00:00 UTC each day and will continue until the campaign ends.
How do I check that all my tasks are verified as completed? 
Click into your task completion progress and a green tick will appear when you've completed a task.

What types of rewards are available?
Top N on Project Leaderboard
Majority of the reward pool is awarded to the top N creators on the specific Project Leaderboard ranking on the dates stipulated in the announcement.
Terms and Conditions
All eligible users are required to complete account verification (KYC) to receive rewards from this Activity.Illegally bulk-registered accounts or sub-accounts are not eligible to participate or receive any rewards. Users identified as risk users within 7 days following the Activity end date will be deemed ineligible for rewards. This ineligibility applies regardless of any changes to the user’s risk status after the rewards have been distributed. However, users identified as risk users during rewards distribution may submit an appeal via this form within 14 days from the date of reward distribution. If the appeal is successful, users can contact our customer service team to request a redistribution of rewards.Any point dispute cases with submitted appeals can be settled within 48 hours after the campaign launch. Please note that we are unable to add points back after this 48-hour period.The user’s language preference is determined based on the predominant language used in the content they have created over the past 90 days. Please note that this setting cannot be changed manually.There will be caps imposed on the amount of rewards available to eligible users per country/region.Trade amounts of the project token exceeding $1,000,000 in one day will not be recorded or awarded points.Posts involving Red Packets or giveaways will be deemed ineligible.Participants found engaging in suspicious views, interactions, or suspected use of automated bots will be disqualified from the Activity.Any modification of previously published posts with high engagement to repurpose them as project submissions will result in disqualification.Each X account can only be linked to one Binance Square account. Only data from Binance Square posts will be taken into account for rewards calculation. Participants are required to keep their campaign-related posts published for a minimum of 30 days following the Activity end date. Deleting posts within this period is not permitted.Any posts found to violate Binance’s Community or Content Guidelines will be deemed ineligible for Activity rewards.Only participation via Binance master accounts will be eligible for rewards. Winners will be notified via a push notification under Creator Center > Square Assistant. Voucher rewards will be distributed within 14 working days from the respective leaderboard snapshot dates (on 2026-03-26 / 2026-04-02 / 2026-04-09).Users may check their voucher rewards via Profile > Rewards Hub. The validity period for the token voucher is set at seven days from the day of distribution. Learn how to redeem a voucher.Binance reserves the right to cancel a user’s eligibility in this Activity if the account is involved in any behavior that breaches the Binance Square Community Management Guidelines or Binance Square Community Platform Terms and Conditions.Binance reserves the right to disqualify any participants who tamper with Binance program code, or interfere with the operation of Binance program code with other software.Binance reserves the right at any time in its sole and absolute discretion to determine and/or amend or vary these terms and conditions without prior notice, including but not limited to canceling, extending, terminating or suspending this activity, the eligibility terms and criteria, the selection and number of winners, and the timing of any act to be done, and all participants shall be bound by these amendments.Binance reserves the right of final interpretation of this Activity and other, including the spotlighting of specific content from time to time.Additional promotion terms and conditions can be accessed here.In compliance with MiCA requirements, unauthorized stablecoins are subject to certain restrictions for EEA users. For more information, please click here.There may be discrepancies between this original content in English and any translated versions. Please refer to the original English version for the most accurate information, in case any discrepancies arise.

Earn your share by visiting CreatorPad and completing tasks now! 
After working at aelf, Zhuling Chen shifted his focus to infrastructure for Proof-of-Stake networks. In 2019, he founded RockX, a company dealing with validators, staking, and institutional clients. In an interview with KR Asia, Chen stated that his goal was to provide institutional investors access to yield from blockchain networks through professional infrastructure. By the end of the 2010s, the crypto market was booming, but participation from major players remained a tricky challenge. Achieving staking yield required technical expertise, validator management, asset security, and constant network monitoring. The initial launch of project @Bedrock in 2023 was positioned as an institutional platform for liquid staking, adhering to KYC and AML requirements. One of the project’s first clients was Amber Group. Investors wanted to earn staking yield but didn't want to lock up capital for long periods. For many funds, liquidity was just as crucial as the yield size. This conflict later became the foundation for the development of #Bedrock and the ecosystem surrounding $BR. Subscribe to not miss part #3 and learn more about the project. #bedrock $BR
After working at aelf, Zhuling Chen shifted his focus to infrastructure for Proof-of-Stake networks. In 2019, he founded RockX, a company dealing with validators, staking, and institutional clients. In an interview with KR Asia, Chen stated that his goal was to provide institutional investors access to yield from blockchain networks through professional infrastructure. By the end of the 2010s, the crypto market was booming, but participation from major players remained a tricky challenge. Achieving staking yield required technical expertise, validator management, asset security, and constant network monitoring.
The initial launch of project @Bedrock in 2023 was positioned as an institutional platform for liquid staking, adhering to KYC and AML requirements. One of the project’s first clients was Amber Group.
Investors wanted to earn staking yield but didn't want to lock up capital for long periods. For many funds, liquidity was just as crucial as the yield size.
This conflict later became the foundation for the development of #Bedrock and the ecosystem surrounding $BR.
Subscribe to not miss part #3 and learn more about the project.
#bedrock $BR
·
--
Bearish
The platform @GeniusOfficial is marketed as a unified non-custodial on-chain trading terminal, designed to consolidate DeFi trading infrastructure into a single execution environment. The project is developed by Shuttle Labs. The main goal of @GeniusOfficial is to tackle the issues that have arisen with the growth of the multi-chain ecosystem: liquidity fragmentation, the need for bridge services, constant network switching, and managing multiple wallets simultaneously. According to published materials, the platform's infrastructure aggregates liquidity from over 150 DEXs, with later publications mentioning a figure exceeding 300 DEXs. Instead of users hunting for liquidity themselves, the $GENIUS ecosystem shifts routing and inter-network interaction up to the protocol level. It is precisely on solving these infrastructure challenges that the development of @GeniusOfficial is currently focused within the framework of #genius . #genius $GENIUS
The platform @GeniusOfficial is marketed as a unified non-custodial on-chain trading terminal, designed to consolidate DeFi trading infrastructure into a single execution environment.
The project is developed by Shuttle Labs. The main goal of @GeniusOfficial is to tackle the issues that have arisen with the growth of the multi-chain ecosystem: liquidity fragmentation, the need for bridge services, constant network switching, and managing multiple wallets simultaneously.
According to published materials, the platform's infrastructure aggregates liquidity from over 150 DEXs, with later publications mentioning a figure exceeding 300 DEXs.
Instead of users hunting for liquidity themselves, the $GENIUS ecosystem shifts routing and inter-network interaction up to the protocol level.
It is precisely on solving these infrastructure challenges that the development of @GeniusOfficial is currently focused within the framework of #genius .
#genius $GENIUS
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs